| ²é¿´: 2415 | »Ø¸´: 9 | |||
lalala1234ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
----------------------------------------- ÒÑÓÐ4È˲ÎÓë
|
|
Dear xx I'm afraid I must reject your submission for publication in Journal of > Power Sources. > > For your guidance, please find attached the reviewers' comments. > > IF you decide to resubmit there must be SUBSTANTIAL changes made. If you > resubmit: > > 1) You MUST make clear that if it is a resubmission of this paper in the > covering letter and ALSO enter "This is a resubmission of paper #_____ " > (add the rejected paper number) in the author's "ENTER COMMENTS" box when > submitting. Each of the current reviewer criticisms must be answered > clearly and separately in an accompanying letter (listing each reviewer > comment and your answer and your correction) and, > 2) Changes made in response to the reviewers must be identified in the new > text by highlighting with colour or by underlining. > 3) NOTE: "A high standard of English is a criterion of acceptance for > publication" > or the paper will be rejected (http://ees.elsevier.com/power/default.asp). > > > Sincerely, > > Chris Dyer > Editor > Journal of Power Sources > > Journal of Power Sources, Editorial Office > E-mail: power@elsevier.com > > Reviewers' comments: > > > Review: > > 2. Is it a new and original contribution? If not, please specify. No > > 3. Does it contain material that might well be omitted? If so, please > specify. > > 4. Is the manuscript clearly presented and well organized? No > > 5. Does the manuscript give adequate references to related work? Yes > > 6. Is the English satisfactory? No > > 7. Are the illustrations and tables all necessary and adequate? No > > 8. Is the summary adequate and informative? No > > 9. Are the conclusions sound and justified? No > > 10. Please list any additional confidential comments to the Editor: > > 11. Do the Research Highlights reflect the contents of the manuscript? > > 12. What is your recommendation? Reject > > > > This manuscript is not recommended for publication. The focus on this > paper appears to be the material characterization of the polymer > created. However, the author does not appear to account for deleterious > effects of water on lithium batteries. The methods note relative humidity, > which really should have no effect on the testing of a dry system. > Additionally the reviewer is not convinced that the as tested electrolyte > is even dry. > With regards to the electrochemical testing the assumptions of impedance > spectroscopy do not work for analysis at 100 mV. The magnitude needs to > be either <10 mV or >120 mV. Secondly no interest is paid in > distinguishing which ion(s) is in fact mobile in the electrolyte. Only > one, Li+, is of interest and it needs to be looked at with special > concern. > Grammatically and spelling wise there were a couple of minor mistakes > wherein letters were in the wrong order, a careful proofreading will > eliminate these. Ultimately it is recommended that the authors submit > this paper to a journal with a more materials intensive focus because the > electrochemistry as it pertains to lithium batteries is tenuous at best. > > ----------------------------------- [ Last edited by lalala1234 on 2012-2-22 at 21:55 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
»·¾³ÁìÓòÈ«¹úÖØµãʵÑéÊÒÕÐÊÕ²©Ê¿1-2Ãû
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶306Ó¢Ò»Êý¶þ
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
301Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ìì½ò´óѧ»¯Ñ§¹¤ÒÕרҵ£¨081702£©315·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
302Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
26²©Ê¿ÉêÇë
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
268Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
311Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
±»ÎÒÑÔÖУºÐÂÄ£°å²»Ç¿µ÷¸ñʽÁË£¬¼Ùר¼Ò¿ªÊ¼¹Ü¸ñʽÁË
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
303Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
mygalaxy1977
ͳæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 5 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: -2.4
- É¢½ð: 1301
- ºì»¨: 15
- Ìû×Ó: 890
- ÔÚÏß: 422.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 325475
- ×¢²á: 2007-03-17
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÊýÀíͳ¼Æ
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
| Èç¹ûÄãÄܺܺûشðÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûµÄ»°£¬×îºÃresubmit,Èç¹û²»ÄÜ£¬¸ÄͶËû¿¯¡£ |
2Â¥2011-06-21 06:14:24
lalala1234
ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- É¢½ð: 123
- Ìû×Ó: 72
- ÔÚÏß: 286.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 698588
- ×¢²á: 2009-02-09
- רҵ: Óлú¸ß·Ö×Ó¹¦ÄܲÄÁÏ
3Â¥2011-06-21 07:11:58
lalala1234
ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- É¢½ð: 123
- Ìû×Ó: 72
- ÔÚÏß: 286.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 698588
- ×¢²á: 2009-02-09
- רҵ: Óлú¸ß·Ö×Ó¹¦ÄܲÄÁÏ
4Â¥2011-06-21 07:12:59
mygalaxy1977
ͳæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 5 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: -2.4
- É¢½ð: 1301
- ºì»¨: 15
- Ìû×Ó: 890
- ÔÚÏß: 422.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 325475
- ×¢²á: 2007-03-17
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÊýÀíͳ¼Æ
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
| Èç¹û½öÊÇÓïÑÔÎÊÌ⣬¿ÉÒÔ»¨Ç®ÕÒרҵ¹«Ë¾¸Äһϡ£ |
5Â¥2011-06-21 07:14:24
lalala1234
ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- É¢½ð: 123
- Ìû×Ó: 72
- ÔÚÏß: 286.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 698588
- ×¢²á: 2009-02-09
- רҵ: Óлú¸ß·Ö×Ó¹¦ÄܲÄÁÏ
6Â¥2011-06-21 07:31:59
mygalaxy1977
ͳæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 5 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: -2.4
- É¢½ð: 1301
- ºì»¨: 15
- Ìû×Ó: 890
- ÔÚÏß: 422.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 325475
- ×¢²á: 2007-03-17
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÊýÀíͳ¼Æ
7Â¥2011-06-21 08:49:30
nom8393
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 382 (˶ʿ)
- ½ð±Ò: 5427.3
- ºì»¨: 15
- Ìû×Ó: 1718
- ÔÚÏß: 537.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1191513
- ×¢²á: 2011-01-17
- רҵ: µØÀíÐÅϢϵͳ
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
| Õâ¸öReviewÒâ¼ûºÜÐײУ¬LZ»¹ÊǸÄͶ±ðµÄÆÚ¿¯°É¡£ |
8Â¥2011-06-21 17:44:21
jingminl
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 9 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 6419
- É¢½ð: 13
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 2162
- ÔÚÏß: 435.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 456753
- ×¢²á: 2007-11-12
- רҵ: ÉúÎïµç´Å¼¼Êõ
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
|
ΪʲôҪ·´»÷ÄØ£¿ ±à¼¸øÁËresubmitµÄ»ú»á£¬¾ÍÊÇ»ù±¾²î²»¶àÁË¡£ Ö»ÒªÄãÈÏÕæ»Ø´ðÿһ¸öÆÀÉóµÄÒâ¼û¾Í¿ÉÒÔÁË¡£ Ö»ÒªÄãÈÏÕæ»Ø´ð£¬ÉÙһЩ½Æ±ç£¬ÆÀÉóÒ»°ã²»»áÌ«ÄÑΪÄãµÄ¡£ |
9Â¥2011-06-21 18:12:47
bear1984
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- SEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 4 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 679.6
- É¢½ð: 3260
- ºì»¨: 17
- Ìû×Ó: 1668
- ÔÚÏß: 541.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 619764
- ×¢²á: 2008-10-08
- רҵ: Ô˳ïÓë¹ÜÀí
10Â¥2011-06-21 18:20:17













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥