24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2761  |  回复: 9

lalala1234

铜虫 (小有名气)

[交流] ----------------------------------------- 已有4人参与

Dear xx

I'm afraid I must reject your submission for publication in Journal of
> Power Sources.
>
> For your guidance, please find attached the reviewers' comments.
>
> IF you decide to resubmit there must be SUBSTANTIAL changes made.  If you
> resubmit:
>
> 1) You MUST make clear that if it is a resubmission of this paper in the
> covering letter and ALSO enter "This is a resubmission of paper #_____ "
> (add the rejected paper number) in the author's "ENTER COMMENTS" box when
> submitting.  Each of the current reviewer criticisms must be answered
> clearly and separately in an accompanying letter (listing each reviewer
> comment and your answer and your correction) and,
> 2) Changes made in response to the reviewers must be identified in the new
> text by highlighting with colour or by underlining.
> 3) NOTE: "A high standard of English is a criterion of acceptance for
> publication"
> or the paper will be rejected (http://ees.elsevier.com/power/default.asp).
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Chris Dyer
> Editor
> Journal of Power Sources
>
> Journal of Power Sources, Editorial Office
> E-mail: power@elsevier.com
>
> Reviewers' comments:
>
>
> Review:
>
> 2. Is it a new and original contribution? If not, please specify. No
>
> 3. Does it contain material that might well be omitted? If so, please
> specify.
>
> 4. Is the manuscript clearly presented and well organized? No
>
> 5. Does the manuscript give adequate references to related work? Yes
>
> 6. Is the English satisfactory? No
>
> 7. Are the illustrations and tables all necessary and adequate? No
>
> 8. Is the summary adequate and informative? No
>
> 9. Are the conclusions sound and justified? No
>
> 10. Please list any additional confidential comments to the Editor:
>
> 11. Do the Research Highlights reflect the contents of the manuscript?
>
> 12. What is your recommendation?  Reject
>
>
>
> This manuscript is not recommended for publication.  The focus on this
> paper appears to be the material characterization of the polymer
> created.  However, the author does not appear to account for deleterious
> effects of water on lithium batteries. The methods note relative humidity,
> which really should have no effect on the testing of a dry system.
> Additionally the reviewer is not convinced that the as tested electrolyte
> is even dry.
> With regards to the electrochemical testing the assumptions of impedance
> spectroscopy do not work for analysis at 100 mV.  The magnitude needs to
> be either <10 mV or >120 mV.  Secondly no interest is paid in
> distinguishing which ion(s) is in fact mobile in the electrolyte.  Only
> one, Li+, is of interest and it needs to be looked at with special
> concern.
> Grammatically and spelling wise there were a couple of minor mistakes
> wherein letters were in the wrong order, a careful proofreading will
> eliminate these.
Ultimately it is recommended that the authors submit
> this paper to a journal with a more materials intensive focus because the
> electrochemistry as it pertains to lithium batteries is tenuous at best.
>
>

-----------------------------------

[ Last edited by lalala1234 on 2012-2-22 at 21:55 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mygalaxy1977

铜虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
如果你能很好回答审稿人的意见的话,最好resubmit,如果不能,改投他刊。
2楼2011-06-21 06:14:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lalala1234

铜虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by mygalaxy1977 at 2011-06-21 06:14:24:
如果你能很好回答审稿人的意见的话,最好resubmit,如果不能,改投他刊。

这个挺难回答的,比方说,reviewer认为文章英语差,,,但是实际上这篇文章写了3年了。。。之前投过JACS,虽然悲剧,也没有说语言不好。
3楼2011-06-21 07:11:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lalala1234

铜虫 (小有名气)

之前投JACS的时候也是reject and resubmit..但是上次没有选择resubmit
4楼2011-06-21 07:12:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mygalaxy1977

铜虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
如果仅是语言问题,可以花钱找专业公司改一下。
5楼2011-06-21 07:14:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lalala1234

铜虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by mygalaxy1977 at 2011-06-21 07:14:24:
如果仅是语言问题,可以花钱找专业公司改一下。

语言肯定没问题的啊,,我的合作者都是美国人,,导师是德国人。。。
我的意思是说,reviewer的一些comments确实比较难回答。。即使去反击,也很苍白,,我说我语言很好,,他坚持认为不好也没办法。
6楼2011-06-21 07:31:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mygalaxy1977

铜虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by lalala1234 at 2011-06-21 07:31:59:
语言肯定没问题的啊,,我的合作者都是美国人,,导师是德国人。。。
我的意思是说,reviewer的一些comments确实比较难回答。。即使去反击,也很苍白,,我说我语言很好,,他坚持认为不好也没办法。

那就没有办法了,只好改投了。
7楼2011-06-21 08:49:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nom8393

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
这个Review意见很凶残,LZ还是改投别的期刊吧。
8楼2011-06-21 17:44:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jingminl

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by lalala1234 at 2011-06-21 07:31:59:
语言肯定没问题的啊,,我的合作者都是美国人,,导师是德国人。。。
我的意思是说,reviewer的一些comments确实比较难回答。。即使去反击,也很苍白,,我说我语言很好,,他坚持认为不好也没办法。

为什么要反击呢?
编辑给了resubmit的机会,就是基本差不多了。
只要你认真回答每一个评审的意见就可以了。
只要你认真回答,少一些狡辩,评审一般不会太难为你的。
9楼2011-06-21 18:12:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bear1984

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
第一个审稿人几乎完全毙掉了啊。。。
10楼2011-06-21 18:20:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 lalala1234 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜? +9 Ldrop2023 2026-08-13 9/450 2026-08-16 13:24 by wukun_007
[基金申请] 欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律 +32 医学老男孩 2026-08-13 72/3600 2026-08-16 13:15 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] 咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否 +7 启萌科技 2026-08-12 26/1300 2026-08-16 12:35 by 启萌科技
[基金申请] 我的国基提前知道中了,可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了,怎么会有这样的人 +11 家与远方 2026-08-10 16/800 2026-08-16 10:28 by ray43
[精细化工] 招聘 金属平磨液,抛光液研发工程师 +3 小天0311 2026-08-14 3/150 2026-08-16 07:31 by H9PLUS
[基金申请] filecode +8 cratir 2026-08-14 12/600 2026-08-15 18:08 by zyfgau
[基金申请] 各位道友,我要去昆明玩几天,回来见。 +7 Tide man 2026-08-14 8/400 2026-08-15 01:11 by arzu_hma
[基金申请] 是这周出结果还是下周出结果? +4 yuleib84 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-14 23:05 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 奇怪,两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样 +8 布布和一二 2026-08-10 11/550 2026-08-14 14:58 by Equinoxhua
[硕博家园] 请教兼职经验 +3 是阿文鸭 2026-08-09 3/150 2026-08-14 12:07 by HER12025
[硕博家园] 读博的好处 +4 lnee 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-14 10:20 by ahsoarli
[基金申请] 静等基金结果 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-10 21/1050 2026-08-13 17:56 by 且听虎啸
[基金申请] 重要来源:本周末出结果 +10 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-12 10/500 2026-08-13 15:46 by likettle
[基金申请] 不应该看fileCode +7 且听虎啸 2026-08-12 9/450 2026-08-13 14:27 by flydreamws
[基金申请] Filecode 又变了,巨变 +3 WH3796 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 14:13 by 小木虫6752397
[基金申请] 分享一下我之前已中青C的计划书的filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-11 5/250 2026-08-13 12:56 by cratir
[基金申请] 结合人工智能,周易传统文化,filecode打分制来了,3分以上希望很大。 +3 Tide man 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 08:35 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 帮忙看看fileCode +7 wwncly 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-11 19:36 by 冰心玉壶晴
[基金申请] 什么时候出结果,有咨询渠道??? +3 Tide man 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 17:54 by kudofaye
[基金申请] 据悉今年马上要出结果了 +7 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 12:42 by Vivilian
信息提示
请填处理意见