24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lalala1234

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
散金: 123
帖子: 72
在线: 286.1小时
虫号: 698588
注册: 2009-02-09
专业: 有机高分子功能材料

[交流] -----------------------------------------已有4人参与

Dear xx

I'm afraid I must reject your submission for publication in Journal of
> Power Sources.
>
> For your guidance, please find attached the reviewers' comments.
>
> IF you decide to resubmit there must be SUBSTANTIAL changes made.  If you
> resubmit:
>
> 1) You MUST make clear that if it is a resubmission of this paper in the
> covering letter and ALSO enter "This is a resubmission of paper #_____ "
> (add the rejected paper number) in the author's "ENTER COMMENTS" box when
> submitting.  Each of the current reviewer criticisms must be answered
> clearly and separately in an accompanying letter (listing each reviewer
> comment and your answer and your correction) and,
> 2) Changes made in response to the reviewers must be identified in the new
> text by highlighting with colour or by underlining.
> 3) NOTE: "A high standard of English is a criterion of acceptance for
> publication"
> or the paper will be rejected (http://ees.elsevier.com/power/default.asp).
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Chris Dyer
> Editor
> Journal of Power Sources
>
> Journal of Power Sources, Editorial Office
> E-mail: power@elsevier.com
>
> Reviewers' comments:
>
>
> Review:
>
> 2. Is it a new and original contribution? If not, please specify. No
>
> 3. Does it contain material that might well be omitted? If so, please
> specify.
>
> 4. Is the manuscript clearly presented and well organized? No
>
> 5. Does the manuscript give adequate references to related work? Yes
>
> 6. Is the English satisfactory? No
>
> 7. Are the illustrations and tables all necessary and adequate? No
>
> 8. Is the summary adequate and informative? No
>
> 9. Are the conclusions sound and justified? No
>
> 10. Please list any additional confidential comments to the Editor:
>
> 11. Do the Research Highlights reflect the contents of the manuscript?
>
> 12. What is your recommendation?  Reject
>
>
>
> This manuscript is not recommended for publication.  The focus on this
> paper appears to be the material characterization of the polymer
> created.  However, the author does not appear to account for deleterious
> effects of water on lithium batteries. The methods note relative humidity,
> which really should have no effect on the testing of a dry system.
> Additionally the reviewer is not convinced that the as tested electrolyte
> is even dry.
> With regards to the electrochemical testing the assumptions of impedance
> spectroscopy do not work for analysis at 100 mV.  The magnitude needs to
> be either <10 mV or >120 mV.  Secondly no interest is paid in
> distinguishing which ion(s) is in fact mobile in the electrolyte.  Only
> one, Li+, is of interest and it needs to be looked at with special
> concern.
> Grammatically and spelling wise there were a couple of minor mistakes
> wherein letters were in the wrong order, a careful proofreading will
> eliminate these.
Ultimately it is recommended that the authors submit
> this paper to a journal with a more materials intensive focus because the
> electrochemistry as it pertains to lithium batteries is tenuous at best.
>
>

-----------------------------------

[ Last edited by lalala1234 on 2012-2-22 at 21:55 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

博士读完未来一定会好吗已经有6人回复
小论文投稿已经有3人回复
Bioresource Technology期刊，第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了已经有9人回复
心脉受损已经有3人回复
到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗已经有8人回复
申请2026年博士已经有6人回复
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。已经有5人回复

1楼2011-06-21 05:38:16

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

jingminl

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 9 (幼儿园)
金币: 6419
散金: 13
红花: 2
帖子: 2162
在线: 435.9小时
虫号: 456753
注册: 2007-11-12
专业: 生物电磁技术

★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖

引用回帖:

Originally posted by lalala1234 at 2011-06-21 07:31:59:
语言肯定没问题的啊，，我的合作者都是美国人，，导师是德国人。。。
我的意思是说，reviewer的一些comments确实比较难回答。。即使去反击，也很苍白，，我说我语言很好，，他坚持认为不好也没办法。

为什么要反击呢？
编辑给了resubmit的机会，就是基本差不多了。
只要你认真回答每一个评审的意见就可以了。
只要你认真回答，少一些狡辩，评审一般不会太难为你的。