应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 论文写作 » 稿子悲剧了，贴意见求分析
21/1返回列表
查看: 1255  |  回复: 11
查看全部回帖@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

jonavy

金虫 (小有名气)

奔向月球

[求助] 稿子悲剧了，贴意见求分析

With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in ******** as an original paper. Attached, please find the reviewers' comments.

The first reviewer is of the opinion that, although the field examples of real rock behaviour are potentially valuable, the manuscript in its present form has too many problems to be publishable in the Journal. The same reviewer points out that:
1.the introduction is superficial and the lumping together of all major discontinuities as "faults", albeit that they have later movement on them is incorrect and would confuse the literature.
2.the physical models lack the scientific basis to justify any conclusions .
3.the statement on page 8 that the formation of the solidified model is similar to "the conditions under which the rock mass solidified" illustrates quite clearly the lack of any appreciation of the geological reality by the authors.

The second reviewer feels that the results reported can be considered of interest from a qualitative point of view only. He is suggesting to have the contribution  rewritten in the form of a technical note. He points out the following:
1.a quantitative comparison with numerical modelling and a detailed structural analysis of the pit mine are lacking.
2.in many portions of the manuscript, an "unscientific" language is used.
3.the general organisation of the work need to be greatly improved.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that your manuscript should be re-written in the form of a technical note (2000 to 2500 words, 5 figures, no abstract is needed) by accounting for the reviewers' comments which are attached herewith.

I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration.

Sincerely yours,

注：最后给的reject

[ Last edited by jonavy on 2012-1-11 at 14:51 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼2012-01-11 14:50:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lyy-bbg

金虫 (著名写手)

verge

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 18:06:45
感觉审稿人提的问题挺深刻的。意见还是值得好好思考的，要按着这个好好修改，祝好运
赞一下 回复此楼
追求过便无所憾
10楼2012-01-11 17:04:53
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 jonavy 的主题更新
21/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭