24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1723  |  回复: 11

jonavy

金虫 (小有名气)

奔向月球

[求助] 稿子悲剧了,贴意见求分析

With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in ******** as an original paper. Attached, please find the reviewers' comments.

The first reviewer is of the opinion that, although the field examples of real rock behaviour are potentially valuable, the manuscript in its present form has too many problems to be publishable in the Journal. The same reviewer points out that:
1.the introduction is superficial and the lumping together of all major discontinuities as "faults", albeit that they have later movement on them is incorrect and would confuse the literature.
2.the physical models lack the scientific basis to justify any conclusions .
3.the statement on page 8 that the formation of the solidified model is similar to "the conditions under which the rock mass solidified" illustrates quite clearly the lack of any appreciation of the geological reality by the authors.

The second reviewer feels that the results reported can be considered of interest from a qualitative point of view only. He is suggesting to have the contribution  rewritten in the form of a technical note. He points out the following:
1.a quantitative comparison with numerical modelling and a detailed structural analysis of the pit mine are lacking.
2.in many portions of the manuscript, an "unscientific" language is used.
3.the general organisation of the work need to be greatly improved.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that your manuscript should be re-written in the form of a technical note (2000 to 2500 words, 5 figures, no abstract is needed) by accounting for the reviewers' comments which are attached herewith.

I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration.

Sincerely yours,

注:最后给的reject

[ Last edited by jonavy on 2012-1-11 at 14:51 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wellyy2005

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

s

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 15:44:14
还有机会,好好修改,重新投啊-----------
2楼2012-01-11 15:07:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ljtwcx

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 15:44:20
要有信心,改改再投吧!
3楼2012-01-11 15:28:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangyidong9165

金虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 15:44:28
重投, a technical note
土壤工作者
4楼2012-01-11 15:41:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

djclj

禁虫 (文坛精英)

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 很多地方难以再深入修改,更高的杂志不敢奢望了,目前都不知道怎么修改了 2012-01-11 16:14:00
本帖内容被屏蔽

5楼2012-01-11 15:58:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaoeager

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 18:05:17
按照审稿人的意见改完后,文章肯定上一个档次。祝福祝福。
你一定要,你就一定能。
6楼2012-01-11 16:35:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

frank213

木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 18:05:28
审稿人的意见很重要。我就是这样花费了很多功夫在上面。会有收获的
中庸不中道
7楼2012-01-11 16:40:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yaoyao145

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 18:05:51
审稿人的意见应该很中肯 楼主改改换个期刊投吧 文章就是这样投了改了再投 慢慢会好的
8楼2012-01-11 16:43:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

icool1314

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 18:06:24
不太懂你这个专业,从审稿意见来判断,专家提的问题可能对你来讲比较麻烦,文章估计是必须要经过大修的。认真和老板讨论下吧,这专家的意见应该还是很中肯的,怎么按照专家说的改。改后再重投
9楼2012-01-11 17:00:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lyy-bbg

金虫 (著名写手)

verge

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 18:06:45
感觉审稿人提的问题挺深刻的。意见还是值得好好思考的,要按着这个好好修改,祝好运
追求过便无所憾
10楼2012-01-11 17:04:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 jonavy 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[公派出国] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 PbwVEMK5haaE 2026-08-25 4/200 2026-08-26 03:20 by cNXvBfCpiZOM
[考博] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急 +3 Qj98d49dHFb9 2026-08-25 4/200 2026-08-26 03:08 by cNXvBfCpiZOM
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急 +3 7K1CJE38xLG4 2026-08-25 4/200 2026-08-26 02:04 by cNXvBfCpiZOM
[基金申请] 今天务委会开完了,明天出结果吗 +18 angus9576 2026-08-25 22/1100 2026-08-26 00:41 by merchancy
[基金申请] 明天应该可查了!? +6 chengyan1220 2026-08-23 6/300 2026-08-25 19:45 by zfd97
[基金申请] 有没有大神帮我看看基金代码 28+4 1234567wang 2026-08-24 10/500 2026-08-25 19:15 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
[基金申请] 2026国自然函评费到账 +20 羊腰板 2026-08-21 23/1150 2026-08-25 16:34 by zsna
[基金申请] 没有任何消息-是不是就凉了 +9 图啦图啦 2026-08-24 10/500 2026-08-25 11:59 by 南海小哥
[教师之家] 导师吐槽:我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生! +3 苏东坡二世 2026-08-23 3/150 2026-08-25 10:35 by shisan1313
[基金申请] 今天基金会出结果吗?20260819 +17 kkkl_v 2026-08-19 18/900 2026-08-25 09:41 by windflowerwy
[基金申请] 只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫 +25 yaoyewhu2008 2026-08-20 27/1350 2026-08-25 08:01 by Equinoxhua
[基金申请] 能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项 +21 koalala 2026-08-24 24/1200 2026-08-24 19:25 by 家与远方
[基金申请] 让我中一个面上吧! +13 大萍1987 2026-08-20 16/800 2026-08-24 10:23 by 太傻了
[教师之家] 跳槽后在研项目怎么办? +5 简单化xn 2026-08-22 10/500 2026-08-23 12:38 by 简单化xn
[基金申请] 时间戳今天,20号变了 +5 archvillain 2026-08-20 5/250 2026-08-22 06:12 by hui_daxiao
[基金申请] 看来今天不会放榜了? +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了 +13 wuchongjun 2026-08-20 19/950 2026-08-21 17:21 by 紫杉醇
[基金申请] 今天放榜没戏了吧 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-19 11/550 2026-08-21 10:06 by gltch
[基金申请] 基金啊基金 +4 longfie172 2026-08-20 4/200 2026-08-21 08:58 by mark mao
信息提示
请填处理意见