应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 论文写作 » 稿子悲剧了，贴意见求分析
121/2返回列表12下一页
查看: 1274  |  回复: 11
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

jonavy

金虫 (小有名气)

奔向月球

[求助] 稿子悲剧了，贴意见求分析

With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in ******** as an original paper. Attached, please find the reviewers' comments.

The first reviewer is of the opinion that, although the field examples of real rock behaviour are potentially valuable, the manuscript in its present form has too many problems to be publishable in the Journal. The same reviewer points out that:
1.the introduction is superficial and the lumping together of all major discontinuities as "faults", albeit that they have later movement on them is incorrect and would confuse the literature.
2.the physical models lack the scientific basis to justify any conclusions .
3.the statement on page 8 that the formation of the solidified model is similar to "the conditions under which the rock mass solidified" illustrates quite clearly the lack of any appreciation of the geological reality by the authors.

The second reviewer feels that the results reported can be considered of interest from a qualitative point of view only. He is suggesting to have the contribution  rewritten in the form of a technical note. He points out the following:
1.a quantitative comparison with numerical modelling and a detailed structural analysis of the pit mine are lacking.
2.in many portions of the manuscript, an "unscientific" language is used.
3.the general organisation of the work need to be greatly improved.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that your manuscript should be re-written in the form of a technical note (2000 to 2500 words, 5 figures, no abstract is needed) by accounting for the reviewers' comments which are attached herewith.

I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration.

Sincerely yours,

注：最后给的reject

[ Last edited by jonavy on 2012-1-11 at 14:51 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼 2012-01-11 14:50:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wellyy2005

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

s

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 15:44:14
还有机会,好好修改,重新投啊-----------
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2012-01-11 15:07:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ljtwcx

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 15:44:20
要有信心，改改再投吧！
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2012-01-11 15:28:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangyidong9165

金虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 15:44:28
重投， a technical note
赞一下 回复此楼
土壤工作者
4楼2012-01-11 15:41:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

djclj

禁虫 (文坛精英)
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 很多地方难以再深入修改，更高的杂志不敢奢望了，目前都不知道怎么修改了 2012-01-11 16:14:00
本帖内容被屏蔽
5楼2012-01-11 15:58:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaoeager

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 18:05:17
按照审稿人的意见改完后，文章肯定上一个档次。祝福祝福。
赞一下 回复此楼
你一定要，你就一定能。
6楼2012-01-11 16:35:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

frank213

木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 18:05:28
审稿人的意见很重要。我就是这样花费了很多功夫在上面。会有收获的
赞一下 回复此楼
中庸不中道
7楼2012-01-11 16:40:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yaoyao145

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 18:05:51
审稿人的意见应该很中肯 楼主改改换个期刊投吧 文章就是这样投了改了再投 慢慢会好的
赞一下 回复此楼
8楼2012-01-11 16:43:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

icool1314

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 18:06:24
不太懂你这个专业，从审稿意见来判断，专家提的问题可能对你来讲比较麻烦，文章估计是必须要经过大修的。认真和老板讨论下吧，这专家的意见应该还是很中肯的，怎么按照专家说的改。改后再重投
赞一下 回复此楼
9楼2012-01-11 17:00:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lyy-bbg

金虫 (著名写手)

verge

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 18:06:45
感觉审稿人提的问题挺深刻的。意见还是值得好好思考的，要按着这个好好修改，祝好运
赞一下 回复此楼
追求过便无所憾
10楼2012-01-11 17:04:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 jonavy 的主题更新
121/2返回列表12下一页
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭