²é¿´: 6142  |  »Ø¸´: 15
µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû

lufuguang

Òø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

[ÇóÖú] ÇóÖú£¬¹ØÓÚÎïÀíÎü¸½¡¢»¯Ñ§Îü¸½ÓëìʵĹØÏµ£¬ÏÂÃæÊÇÉó¸åÈ˸øµÄÒâ¼û£¬²»ÖªµÀÔõô»Ø´ðÁË

As the kinetic data are fitted well by pseudo-second-order model, it can be said the adsorption mechanism is due to chemisorption. However the value of enthalpy (¦¤H) (table 3£¬¦¤H=-2.3KJ.mol-1) indicates that it is due to physisorption? Would the author please explain it?
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:

ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

xiaoxiaowuya

Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

·´Ó¦ÈÈÁ¦Ñ§µÄÎÊÌâ¡£½¨Òé¿´¿´ÎïÀí»¯Ñ§µÄÊé¡£¿´¿´ìʱäµÄÒâÒåÊÇʲô
2Â¥2012-01-04 00:29:29
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ lufuguang µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û