24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 7507  |  回复: 9
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zhang668

木虫 (正式写手)

[求助] PRL编辑拒稿信,请大家看看还有申诉必要吗

前几天一篇偏理论方面的文章投到PRL上,自己感觉结果是比较新的,纯计算和理论结合方法。
过几天之后收到编辑来信,说不适合在PRL发表,但在最后说可以考虑修改Abstract,Introduction,和Concusion,所以请大家帮忙看看,还有修改后申诉的必要吗?是不是所有的拒稿都会说修改后考虑的客套话?

论文状态:with authour!
下面是编辑来信:
>We have considered your manuscript and conclude that it is not suited
>for Physical Review Letters.
>
>We make no judgment on the correctness or technical aspects of your
>work.  However, from our understanding of the paper's physics results,
>context, and motivation, we conclude that your paper does not meet the
>Physical Review Letters criteria of impact, innovation, and interest.
>Our criteria require a clear justification for consideration of the
>paper by PRL, rather than by a specialized journal. Your work appears
>better suited for submittal to the latter.  [Please see our editorials
>http://prl.aps.org/edannounce/PRLv95i7.html (2005) and
>http://prl.aps.org/edannounce/PhysRevLett.103.010001 (2009).]
>
>In view of our assessment, we are not sending your manuscript out for
>review.
If you feel we have misjudged your paper, we would consider a revision
>that attempts to meet our journal's criteria.  The abstract,
>introduction, and conclusion should convey clearly the importance and
>interest of the work to our broad readership.  If we are not persuaded
>that review is appropriate, we may consult a Divisional Associate
>Editor on that question.  If we find it warranted, or the Divisional
>Associate Editor so recommends, we will seek anonymous review.
>
>Yours sincerely,
>
>Daniel Ucko
>Senior Assistant Editor
>Physical Review Letters
>The premier APS journal for current research
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

工作机会 Phys Rev Lett

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

宝宝小熊

木虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by 笨笨9718 at 2011-11-18 13:48:24


连送审都不给机会,这个编辑不哈你啊

赶紧改投啊

PRL平均送审率不到25%,如果是中国人,那更低
8楼2013-10-04 11:02:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zhang668 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见