24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2958  |  回复: 9
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lnshining

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 大家帮我看看审稿人的意见是大修还是小修,接收概率多大

>Referee report:
>
>We recognise the efforts authors have put into this work. However, we find that the manuscript is too rough and deficient. Some new and important information should be included and mistakes in the text were also found. I will not recommend publishing the manuscript in its present form. Extensive revision and a subsequent review may render it acceptable. The followings are the comments in detail,
>
>1)        The magnetic properties presented in the manuscript may not be accurate since the maximum field of the author's VSM is only 12 kOe.
>
>2)        We want to know the effect of the Ti substitution. Fig.6 should be the SEM images of Co82Zr18, Co82Zr16Ti2, Co82Zr14Ti4, Co82Zr12Ti6 samples.
>
>3)        The temperature dependence of the magnetization is in general a key point in the characterization of the magnetic material. Why the authors did not present it?
>
>4)        Why the coercivity of the Co82Zr14Ti4 specimen with an average grain size of 1 um (40m/s) was lower than that of the specimen with an average grain size of 2 um (30 m/s)?
>
>5)        The manuscript major problems are syntax and English. Extensive corrections are required
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

亚楠

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

追逐幸福的人

【答案】应助回帖

应该还不错的结果,按审稿意见好好修改!
我的人生注定了有你陪伴,我们的生活会越来越美好,加油!
3楼2011-08-14 09:42:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 10 个回答

时空穿行

铜虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

引用回帖:
1楼: Originally posted by lnshining at 2011-08-13 19:43:07:
>Referee report:
>
>We recognise the efforts authors have put into this work. However, we find that the manuscript is too rough and deficient. Some new and important information should b ...

按意见好好修改,接受概率看你改的好坏了。改完还是审稿人看,直到满意。
2楼2011-08-13 20:18:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

muzhongfei

木虫 (正式写手)

QQ: 77486526

这是大修意见啊. 审稿人说你手稿太粗糙,缺内容.不建议出版.但是没有很强烈. 给必你机会让你修改.所以努力修改吧. 毕竟编辑比较认可,可能另一个审稿人的意见较好.
muzhongfei@gdut.edu.cn
4楼2011-08-14 12:37:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gongjf

木虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

Extensive revision and a subsequent review may render it acceptable.
这句话看来是明确的大修,修改好了还是能够接受的。看他的意思是,你的工作是有意义的,但是还不够完善,你要按照他的意见认真修补。如果按照他的意见都修好了,接受的概率还是很大的。
5楼2011-08-15 12:14:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律 +32 医学老男孩 2026-08-13 74/3700 2026-08-16 21:05 by 医学老男孩
[论文投稿] 岩土工程学报什么时候才能终审完呐 25+3 yeager111 2026-08-10 4/200 2026-08-16 20:42 by tfang
[基金申请] 快农历七夕节了,轻松一下,男人悄悄话,女施主请不要进来。 +3 Tide man 2026-08-14 3/150 2026-08-16 17:47 by jurkat.1640
[基金申请] 咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否 +7 启萌科技 2026-08-12 26/1300 2026-08-16 12:35 by 启萌科技
[基金申请] 有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验) +10 majunge000 2026-08-11 12/600 2026-08-16 08:18 by xli1984
[基金申请] filecode=后面第一个是大写字母 +6 wangze12014 2026-08-14 7/350 2026-08-15 20:12 by gltch
[基金申请] filecode +8 cratir 2026-08-14 12/600 2026-08-15 18:08 by zyfgau
[基金申请] 小木虫上这么多卖论文的,真有人买论文么?感觉没必要啊 +12 Tide man 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-15 16:34 by 氺木
[基金申请] 关于Filecode分析方法 +10 majunge000 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-15 12:26 by hanpeng972
[基金申请] 奇怪,两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样 +8 布布和一二 2026-08-10 11/550 2026-08-14 14:58 by Equinoxhua
[基金申请] filecode +15 documentary 2026-08-10 17/850 2026-08-14 10:08 by kissu88
[基金申请] FileCode能看出啥? +10 要乐观耀哥 2026-08-10 32/1600 2026-08-14 09:37 by 要乐观耀哥
[基金申请] 静等基金结果 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-10 21/1050 2026-08-13 17:56 by 且听虎啸
[基金申请] 不应该看fileCode +7 且听虎啸 2026-08-12 9/450 2026-08-13 14:27 by flydreamws
[基金申请] 结合人工智能,周易传统文化,filecode打分制来了,3分以上希望很大。 +3 Tide man 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 08:35 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 2019年青年基金涵评意见,大家看看几个A,几个B? +11 Tide man 2026-08-11 11/550 2026-08-13 07:35 by 撸猫猫
[基金申请] 帮忙看看fileCode +7 wwncly 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-11 19:36 by 冰心玉壶晴
[基金申请] 什么时候出结果,有咨询渠道??? +3 Tide man 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 17:54 by kudofaye
[基金申请] 确定了,国自然21号放榜 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-10 19:15 by 2000zf36392
[基金申请] 国自然结果 +4 Vierhys 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 15:06 by Vierhys
信息提示
请填处理意见