应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 专业学科区 » 物理 » 大家帮我看看审稿人的意见是大修还是小修，接收概率多大
21/1返回列表
查看: 2399  |  回复: 9
查看全部回帖@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lnshining

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 大家帮我看看审稿人的意见是大修还是小修，接收概率多大

>Referee report:
>
>We recognise the efforts authors have put into this work. However, we find that the manuscript is too rough and deficient. Some new and important information should be included and mistakes in the text were also found. I will not recommend publishing the manuscript in its present form. Extensive revision and a subsequent review may render it acceptable. The followings are the comments in detail,
>
>1)        The magnetic properties presented in the manuscript may not be accurate since the maximum field of the author's VSM is only 12 kOe.
>
>2)        We want to know the effect of the Ti substitution. Fig.6 should be the SEM images of Co82Zr18, Co82Zr16Ti2, Co82Zr14Ti4, Co82Zr12Ti6 samples.
>
>3)        The temperature dependence of the magnetization is in general a key point in the characterization of the magnetic material. Why the authors did not present it?
>
>4)        Why the coercivity of the Co82Zr14Ti4 specimen with an average grain size of 1 um (40m/s) was lower than that of the specimen with an average grain size of 2 um (30 m/s)?
>
>5)        The manuscript major problems are syntax and English. Extensive corrections are required
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼2011-08-13 19:43:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gongjf

木虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

Extensive revision and a subsequent review may render it acceptable.
这句话看来是明确的大修，修改好了还是能够接受的。看他的意思是，你的工作是有意义的，但是还不够完善，你要按照他的意见认真修补。如果按照他的意见都修好了，接受的概率还是很大的。
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2011-08-15 12:14:03
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 lnshining 的主题更新
21/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭