| 查看: 16513 | 回复: 63 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Crystal Growth & Design小修后被拒,大家帮我分析一下怎么回事?
|
|||
|
前一段时间我投了一篇Crystal Growth & Design,第一次修改是大修,我修改后,编辑又让我小修,小修时编辑和审稿人的回信是这样的 The reviews for your manuscript are enclosed with this letter. Please consider the reviewers' comments. They have raised points that require consideration and revision of the manuscript before it is suitable for publication. However, with adequate response and revision, the manuscript should be acceptable for publication in Crystal Growth & Design. We would like to receive your revision as soon as possible, 90 days at the latest. We look forward to seeing your paper in Crystal Growth & Design. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after minor revision. Comments: In this revised version, the authors have taken into account most of the reviewers' comment and I find it publishable. My only comment concerns the data listed in Table 2: I do not believe that one can determine them with such an accuracy; uncertainties should be evaluated. 小修我投上去过了25天还是没有消息,我实在等不住了,就给编辑发了一封催稿信,结果两天以后收到编辑的拒稿信,信得内容如下: Thank you for considering Crystal Growth & Design for your manuscript submission. Due to the large number of manuscripts submitted to our journal and the increased demands that are being placed on our reviewers, we must assess closely, and prior to external review by expert specialists, whether a manuscript fits within the scope of the Journal and whether it will have sufficient appeal to a significant segment of our readership. Manuscripts that are not within the scope of the Journal (see http://pubs.acs.org/page/cgdefu/about.html) or do not provide clear evidence for a significant advance that is likely to be of broad interest to the crystal growth or crystal engineering communities, will not be considered further for publication. In my view, your manuscript does not meet these standards and therefore, I regret that we cannot consider it further for publication. Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. Thank you again for submitting your manuscript to Crystal Growth & Design. I hope that you will continue to consider our journal for publication of your papers in the future. 这是怎么回事呀?请各位虫友帮我分析一下啊,好郁闷呀,我感觉我很认真的按照审稿人的意见修改了,怎么还是杯具了! |
» 猜你喜欢
有时候真觉得大城市人没有县城人甚至个体户幸福
已经有3人回复
CSC & MSCA 博洛尼亚大学能源材料课题组博士/博士后招生|MSCA经费充足、排名优
已经有5人回复
酰胺脱乙酰基
已经有8人回复
有70后还继续奋斗在职场上的吗?
已经有6人回复
博士延得我,科研能力直往上蹿
已经有7人回复
退学或坚持读
已经有27人回复
面上基金申报没有其他的参与者成吗
已经有5人回复
遇见不省心的家人很难过
已经有22人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
帮我看看这断口怎么分析?多谢。
已经有13人回复
请大家帮我分析下该去法国还是去澳大利亚?
已经有37人回复
文章小修后被拒,然后又被接收的曲折之路,散金币!
已经有212人回复
有没有小修后被拒的?
已经有39人回复
对比CrystEngComm和Crystal Growth & Design
已经有11人回复
大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见,录用几率大不?
已经有24人回复
投稿Crystal Growth & Design
已经有34人回复
crystal growth and design审稿周期多长啊,着急。
已经有7人回复
求助crystal growth & design投稿 需要的晶体个数?
已经有5人回复
大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修?希望大吗?(散50B,每人2个)
已经有68人回复
Crystal Growth and Design 小修中的两个棘手问题。
已经有10人回复
被tetrahetron拒稿,大家帮我分析一下!
已经有3人回复
crystal growth design 审稿大家都是多长时间
已经有13人回复
投稿Journal of Crystal Growth被拒,一句内容没看懂,麻烦哪位帮忙解释一下。
已经有16人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
中国石油大学(华东)吴传德教授团队(国家杰青)2026硕、博招生
+2/224
多功能 电子微生物生长分析仪 及 微生物快检技术开发服务
+2/140
供应爱德华RV 3、RV 12,阿特拉斯及莱宝真空品牌油泵及分子泵等真空产品15216851283
+1/87
黄汉民团队联合淮北师范大学招聘师资博士后(年薪30-40万)
+1/83
诚聘 有机光电材料计算方向 博士后、科研助理、访问学生
+1/75
山东征女友,坐标济南
+1/64
电力全国重点实验室双一流A类长江学者团队招2026年全日制博士1-2名/博士后
+2/52
西交利物浦大学招收26年【全奖】博士生1名(空间智能沉浸式手术导航)
+1/31
山东科技大学招聘化学化工博士博士后
+1/26
中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院——招聘客座研究生
+3/13
江汉大学轩亮教授课题组招博士研究生/博士后
+1/13
意大利华人老师University of Padova-全额奖学金博士
+1/11
江汉大学轩亮教授课题组招博士研究生/博士后
+1/9
哈工大(深圳)物理招收2026年9月入学博士生1个名额
+1/7
邵阳学院食品与化学工程学院硕士调剂
+1/3
哈工大(深圳)物理招收2026年9月入学博士生1个名额
+1/3
华南理工大学宋波教授联合唐本忠院士招聘化学和材料方向博士后(长期有效)
+1/2
德国Karlsruhe Institute of Technology招收电化学储能及联合培养CSC博士等
+1/2
上海理工大学“新能源材料”专业-赵斌教授招收申请考核制博士生【能源催化方向】
+1/1
武汉理工大学数学与统计学院张秀军教授课题组招收2026级秋季博士研究生
+1/1
★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
cxksama(金币+1): 鼓励交流 2011-06-28 13:17:34
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
cxksama(金币+1): 鼓励交流 2011-06-28 13:17:34
| Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. |
8楼2011-06-27 18:06:20
2楼2011-06-27 17:42:57
3楼2011-06-27 17:48:24
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
|
Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. 可能是编辑搞错了,楼上说的对,你仔细核对一下 |
4楼2011-06-27 17:50:21
简单回复
2011-06-27 18:00
















回复此楼
