| 查看: 18432 | 回复: 63 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Crystal Growth & Design小修后被拒，大家帮我分析一下怎么回事?
|
|||
|
前一段时间我投了一篇Crystal Growth & Design，第一次修改是大修，我修改后，编辑又让我小修，小修时编辑和审稿人的回信是这样的 The reviews for your manuscript are enclosed with this letter. Please consider the reviewers' comments. They have raised points that require consideration and revision of the manuscript before it is suitable for publication. However, with adequate response and revision, the manuscript should be acceptable for publication in Crystal Growth & Design. We would like to receive your revision as soon as possible, 90 days at the latest. We look forward to seeing your paper in Crystal Growth & Design. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after minor revision. Comments: In this revised version, the authors have taken into account most of the reviewers' comment and I find it publishable. My only comment concerns the data listed in Table 2: I do not believe that one can determine them with such an accuracy; uncertainties should be evaluated. 小修我投上去过了25天还是没有消息，我实在等不住了，就给编辑发了一封催稿信，结果两天以后收到编辑的拒稿信，信得内容如下： Thank you for considering Crystal Growth & Design for your manuscript submission. Due to the large number of manuscripts submitted to our journal and the increased demands that are being placed on our reviewers, we must assess closely, and prior to external review by expert specialists, whether a manuscript fits within the scope of the Journal and whether it will have sufficient appeal to a significant segment of our readership. Manuscripts that are not within the scope of the Journal (see http://pubs.acs.org/page/cgdefu/about.html) or do not provide clear evidence for a significant advance that is likely to be of broad interest to the crystal growth or crystal engineering communities, will not be considered further for publication. In my view, your manuscript does not meet these standards and therefore, I regret that we cannot consider it further for publication. Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. Thank you again for submitting your manuscript to Crystal Growth & Design. I hope that you will continue to consider our journal for publication of your papers in the future. 这是怎么回事呀？请各位虫友帮我分析一下啊，好郁闷呀，我感觉我很认真的按照审稿人的意见修改了，怎么还是杯具了！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有14人回复
-
科研孤儿太难了
已经有22人回复
-
系统查不到
已经有5人回复
-
怎么查啊
已经有4人回复
-
国合里面能看到了
已经有7人回复
-
国际合作可查了，中了面上
已经有18人回复
-
能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项
已经有25人回复
-
系统进不去
已经有5人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有8人回复
-
项目信息和经费信息在系统里都可以看到了
已经有14人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 帮我看看这断口怎么分析？多谢。
已经有13人回复
- 请大家帮我分析下该去法国还是去澳大利亚？
已经有37人回复
- 文章小修后被拒，然后又被接收的曲折之路，散金币！
已经有212人回复
- 有没有小修后被拒的？
已经有39人回复
- 对比CrystEngComm和Crystal Growth & Design
已经有11人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 投稿Crystal Growth & Design
已经有34人回复
- crystal growth and design审稿周期多长啊，着急。
已经有7人回复
- 求助crystal growth & design投稿 需要的晶体个数？
已经有5人回复
- 大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修？希望大吗？（散50B，每人2个）
已经有68人回复
- Crystal Growth and Design 小修中的两个棘手问题。
已经有10人回复
- 被tetrahetron拒稿，大家帮我分析一下！
已经有3人回复
- crystal growth design 审稿大家都是多长时间
已经有13人回复
- 投稿Journal of Crystal Growth被拒，一句内容没看懂，麻烦哪位帮忙解释一下。
已经有16人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
面上中了，意料之外
+3/1642
-
面上中了，与大家共勉， 一点点小心得，可私信分享
+5/490
-
面上中啦
+2/235
-
第三次申请国自科面上的一点心得分享
+1/100
-
刚查了没中，分享下心情
+2/82
-
面上中了
+1/78
-
散金感谢小木虫
+1/72
-
散金币
+1/56
-
今年国基没中，有点难过，但生活还要继续
+1/38
-
香港城市大学分子电子学方向招收2027年秋季入学博士生
+1/12
-
【即将截止】东北大学理学院 力学 李健组招2027级保研
+1/7
-
2027直博及统招“申请-考核”制博士招生 | 广州国家实验室-中山大学 谢志课题组
+1/7
-
【科研实践合作】邀请老师带学生完成一次严谨的科学表达
+1/6
-
中科院大连化学物理研究所 招聘 催化剂研发方向 科研助理 2名
+1/4
-
南京大学 智能驱动与感知材料实验室 诚招申请考核博士生/科研助理/博士后
+1/4
-
祈祷老公中国基
+1/3
-
新审查指南施行半年，AI方向的专利申请是不是更看"技术味"了？
+1/2
-
基金祈福
+1/1
-
【即将截止】东北大学理学院 力学 李健组2027级保研
+1/1
-
量子物理团队招收博士生与博士后
+1/1
34楼2011-06-28 08:22:59
2楼2011-06-27 17:42:57
3楼2011-06-27 17:48:24
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
|
Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. 可能是编辑搞错了，楼上说的对，你仔细核对一下 |
4楼2011-06-27 17:50:21
简单回复
2011-06-27 18:00
