| 查看: 16729 | 回复: 63 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Crystal Growth & Design小修后被拒，大家帮我分析一下怎么回事?
|
|||
|
前一段时间我投了一篇Crystal Growth & Design，第一次修改是大修，我修改后，编辑又让我小修，小修时编辑和审稿人的回信是这样的 The reviews for your manuscript are enclosed with this letter. Please consider the reviewers' comments. They have raised points that require consideration and revision of the manuscript before it is suitable for publication. However, with adequate response and revision, the manuscript should be acceptable for publication in Crystal Growth & Design. We would like to receive your revision as soon as possible, 90 days at the latest. We look forward to seeing your paper in Crystal Growth & Design. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after minor revision. Comments: In this revised version, the authors have taken into account most of the reviewers' comment and I find it publishable. My only comment concerns the data listed in Table 2: I do not believe that one can determine them with such an accuracy; uncertainties should be evaluated. 小修我投上去过了25天还是没有消息，我实在等不住了，就给编辑发了一封催稿信，结果两天以后收到编辑的拒稿信，信得内容如下： Thank you for considering Crystal Growth & Design for your manuscript submission. Due to the large number of manuscripts submitted to our journal and the increased demands that are being placed on our reviewers, we must assess closely, and prior to external review by expert specialists, whether a manuscript fits within the scope of the Journal and whether it will have sufficient appeal to a significant segment of our readership. Manuscripts that are not within the scope of the Journal (see http://pubs.acs.org/page/cgdefu/about.html) or do not provide clear evidence for a significant advance that is likely to be of broad interest to the crystal growth or crystal engineering communities, will not be considered further for publication. In my view, your manuscript does not meet these standards and therefore, I regret that we cannot consider it further for publication. Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. Thank you again for submitting your manuscript to Crystal Growth & Design. I hope that you will continue to consider our journal for publication of your papers in the future. 这是怎么回事呀？请各位虫友帮我分析一下啊，好郁闷呀，我感觉我很认真的按照审稿人的意见修改了，怎么还是杯具了！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
295材料工程专硕求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
085701环境工程求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
083000学硕274求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
275求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
295求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿211院校 344分 东北农业大学生物学学硕，求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
085602 307分 求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
322求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
高温高压反应求助
已经有3人回复
-
一志愿上海理工能源动力（085800）310分求调剂
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 帮我看看这断口怎么分析？多谢。
已经有13人回复
- 请大家帮我分析下该去法国还是去澳大利亚？
已经有37人回复
- 文章小修后被拒，然后又被接收的曲折之路，散金币！
已经有212人回复
- 有没有小修后被拒的？
已经有39人回复
- 对比CrystEngComm和Crystal Growth & Design
已经有11人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 投稿Crystal Growth & Design
已经有34人回复
- crystal growth and design审稿周期多长啊，着急。
已经有7人回复
- 求助crystal growth & design投稿 需要的晶体个数？
已经有5人回复
- 大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修？希望大吗？（散50B，每人2个）
已经有68人回复
- Crystal Growth and Design 小修中的两个棘手问题。
已经有10人回复
- 被tetrahetron拒稿，大家帮我分析一下！
已经有3人回复
- crystal growth design 审稿大家都是多长时间
已经有13人回复
- 投稿Journal of Crystal Growth被拒，一句内容没看懂，麻烦哪位帮忙解释一下。
已经有16人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
数一英一硕士调剂（双一流高校）
+1/184
-
欢迎报考赣南师范大学智能制造与未来能源学院
+2/72
-
西京学院土木水利 2026 级研究生招生
+2/50
-
济南大学水利与环境学院赵艳侠简介
+1/48
-
浙江省人民医院博士后岗位招聘
+1/37
-
天津理工大学国家杰青王铁团队招聘
+1/29
-
西华大学材料学院表面科学与工程技术科研团队2026年招收研究生
+1/20
-
双一流大学湘潭大学“化工过程模拟与强化”国家地方联合工程研究中心招收博士生
+1/17
-
长江大学石油工程学院2026年硕士调剂招生公告!!!
+1/15
-
中国科学院上海硅酸盐研究所施剑林院士团队胡萍课题组招聘博士后
+1/14
-
中科院物理所二维材料方向招收推免研究生
+1/13
-
中国地震局地质研究所+地球物理专业+接收调剂
+1/13
-
宁夏大学化学化工学院魏逸彬研究员课题组招聘启事
+1/7
-
武汉纺织大学国家杰青课题组诚招调剂硕士研究生
+1/6
-
0854工学-电子信息考研-302分求调剂，接受跨专业，只求有学上！！！ ! ! ! ！
+1/4
-
26年招收07 08学术型/专业型硕士研究生
+1/3
-
上海交通大学化学化工学院张智涛课题组诚聘博士后
+1/1
-
福建师范大学环境与资源学院招收2026级硕士生
+1/1
-
一志愿西南交大机械专硕343求调剂
+1/1
-
天津大学福州校区｜学长推荐上岸新思路
+1/1
22楼2011-06-27 20:34:43
2楼2011-06-27 17:42:57
3楼2011-06-27 17:48:24
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
|
Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. 可能是编辑搞错了，楼上说的对，你仔细核对一下 |
4楼2011-06-27 17:50:21
简单回复
2011-06-27 18:00
