| 查看: 16760 | 回复: 63 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Crystal Growth & Design小修后被拒，大家帮我分析一下怎么回事?
|
|||
|
前一段时间我投了一篇Crystal Growth & Design，第一次修改是大修，我修改后，编辑又让我小修，小修时编辑和审稿人的回信是这样的 The reviews for your manuscript are enclosed with this letter. Please consider the reviewers' comments. They have raised points that require consideration and revision of the manuscript before it is suitable for publication. However, with adequate response and revision, the manuscript should be acceptable for publication in Crystal Growth & Design. We would like to receive your revision as soon as possible, 90 days at the latest. We look forward to seeing your paper in Crystal Growth & Design. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after minor revision. Comments: In this revised version, the authors have taken into account most of the reviewers' comment and I find it publishable. My only comment concerns the data listed in Table 2: I do not believe that one can determine them with such an accuracy; uncertainties should be evaluated. 小修我投上去过了25天还是没有消息，我实在等不住了，就给编辑发了一封催稿信，结果两天以后收到编辑的拒稿信，信得内容如下： Thank you for considering Crystal Growth & Design for your manuscript submission. Due to the large number of manuscripts submitted to our journal and the increased demands that are being placed on our reviewers, we must assess closely, and prior to external review by expert specialists, whether a manuscript fits within the scope of the Journal and whether it will have sufficient appeal to a significant segment of our readership. Manuscripts that are not within the scope of the Journal (see http://pubs.acs.org/page/cgdefu/about.html) or do not provide clear evidence for a significant advance that is likely to be of broad interest to the crystal growth or crystal engineering communities, will not be considered further for publication. In my view, your manuscript does not meet these standards and therefore, I regret that we cannot consider it further for publication. Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. Thank you again for submitting your manuscript to Crystal Growth & Design. I hope that you will continue to consider our journal for publication of your papers in the future. 这是怎么回事呀？请各位虫友帮我分析一下啊，好郁闷呀，我感觉我很认真的按照审稿人的意见修改了，怎么还是杯具了！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
085600 286分 材料求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
275求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
286求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
083000学硕274求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
【求调剂】085601材料工程专硕 | 总分272 |
已经有5人回复
-
275求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
0856，材料与化工321分求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
085701环境工程，267求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
320分，材料与化工专业，求调剂
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 帮我看看这断口怎么分析？多谢。
已经有13人回复
- 请大家帮我分析下该去法国还是去澳大利亚？
已经有37人回复
- 文章小修后被拒，然后又被接收的曲折之路，散金币！
已经有212人回复
- 有没有小修后被拒的？
已经有39人回复
- 对比CrystEngComm和Crystal Growth & Design
已经有11人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 投稿Crystal Growth & Design
已经有34人回复
- crystal growth and design审稿周期多长啊，着急。
已经有7人回复
- 求助crystal growth & design投稿 需要的晶体个数？
已经有5人回复
- 大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修？希望大吗？（散50B，每人2个）
已经有68人回复
- Crystal Growth and Design 小修中的两个棘手问题。
已经有10人回复
- 被tetrahetron拒稿，大家帮我分析一下！
已经有3人回复
- crystal growth design 审稿大家都是多长时间
已经有13人回复
- 投稿Journal of Crystal Growth被拒，一句内容没看懂，麻烦哪位帮忙解释一下。
已经有16人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
基金祈福
+3/1685
-
【招聘】温州医科大学/附属医院/瓯江实验室李校堃院士团队诚聘博士后和科研人员
+1/192
-
讲师身份申请面上项目中标率有影响吗
+1/75
-
福建农林大学材料院招收调剂硕士生
+1/37
-
上海大学 “生物有机电子材料及器件”团队硕士、博士研究生招聘
+1/36
-
08开头有调剂需求的同学
+3/19
-
苏州初创公司诚聘有机合成化学家
+1/12
-
聚焦心力衰竭和动脉粥样硬化机制研究｜国家老年医学中心心血管疾病科研团队 学术成果
+1/11
-
韩国庆熙大学 Yu Taekyung 教授招2026年博士研究生
+1/10
-
江西科技师范大学 材料与能源招收调剂研究生
+1/8
-
【MP期刊】青年编委招募开启！加入我们，一起推动材料科学前沿
+1/6
-
教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划”入选团队招收 材料，化学与化工博士研究生
+1/5
-
澳门理工大学2026人工智能药物发现博士（奖学金+申请考核）
+1/5
-
武汉纺织大学沈爱国教授团队招收化学、生物、材料专业研究生
+1/5
-
天津工业大学双一流高校招博士、硕士、博士后
+1/4
-
考研292求调剂
+1/3
-
化学工程与技术 国家双一流学科 211高校 国家重点实验室 博士研究生
+1/2
-
海南师范大学 孙元元老师团队招2026级硕士生2名
+1/2
-
易度层流质量流量计在航空发动机压缩空气测试中的应用
+1/2
-
中国科学院杭州医学研究所接收药学及生物医学调剂生
+1/1
20楼2011-06-27 20:06:51
2楼2011-06-27 17:42:57
3楼2011-06-27 17:48:24
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
|
Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. 可能是编辑搞错了，楼上说的对，你仔细核对一下 |
4楼2011-06-27 17:50:21
简单回复
2011-06-27 18:00
