| 查看: 18542 | 回复: 63 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Crystal Growth & Design小修后被拒，大家帮我分析一下怎么回事?
|
|||
|
前一段时间我投了一篇Crystal Growth & Design，第一次修改是大修，我修改后，编辑又让我小修，小修时编辑和审稿人的回信是这样的 The reviews for your manuscript are enclosed with this letter. Please consider the reviewers' comments. They have raised points that require consideration and revision of the manuscript before it is suitable for publication. However, with adequate response and revision, the manuscript should be acceptable for publication in Crystal Growth & Design. We would like to receive your revision as soon as possible, 90 days at the latest. We look forward to seeing your paper in Crystal Growth & Design. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after minor revision. Comments: In this revised version, the authors have taken into account most of the reviewers' comment and I find it publishable. My only comment concerns the data listed in Table 2: I do not believe that one can determine them with such an accuracy; uncertainties should be evaluated. 小修我投上去过了25天还是没有消息，我实在等不住了，就给编辑发了一封催稿信，结果两天以后收到编辑的拒稿信，信得内容如下： Thank you for considering Crystal Growth & Design for your manuscript submission. Due to the large number of manuscripts submitted to our journal and the increased demands that are being placed on our reviewers, we must assess closely, and prior to external review by expert specialists, whether a manuscript fits within the scope of the Journal and whether it will have sufficient appeal to a significant segment of our readership. Manuscripts that are not within the scope of the Journal (see http://pubs.acs.org/page/cgdefu/about.html) or do not provide clear evidence for a significant advance that is likely to be of broad interest to the crystal growth or crystal engineering communities, will not be considered further for publication. In my view, your manuscript does not meet these standards and therefore, I regret that we cannot consider it further for publication. Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. Thank you again for submitting your manuscript to Crystal Growth & Design. I hope that you will continue to consider our journal for publication of your papers in the future. 这是怎么回事呀？请各位虫友帮我分析一下啊，好郁闷呀，我感觉我很认真的按照审稿人的意见修改了，怎么还是杯具了！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有12人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有14人回复
-
面上意见出来了
已经有18人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
-
能否申诉？
已经有4人回复
-
找导师
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 帮我看看这断口怎么分析？多谢。
已经有13人回复
- 请大家帮我分析下该去法国还是去澳大利亚？
已经有37人回复
- 文章小修后被拒，然后又被接收的曲折之路，散金币！
已经有212人回复
- 有没有小修后被拒的？
已经有39人回复
- 对比CrystEngComm和Crystal Growth & Design
已经有11人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 投稿Crystal Growth & Design
已经有34人回复
- crystal growth and design审稿周期多长啊，着急。
已经有7人回复
- 求助crystal growth & design投稿 需要的晶体个数？
已经有5人回复
- 大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修？希望大吗？（散50B，每人2个）
已经有68人回复
- Crystal Growth and Design 小修中的两个棘手问题。
已经有10人回复
- 被tetrahetron拒稿，大家帮我分析一下！
已经有3人回复
- crystal growth design 审稿大家都是多长时间
已经有13人回复
- 投稿Journal of Crystal Growth被拒，一句内容没看懂，麻烦哪位帮忙解释一下。
已经有16人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
云南大学丁军桥团队2027年博士招生
+1/1984
-
面上中了，散金币。
+5/1730
-
八年奋战，面上中了，同时一个读了8年的博士（中途接手）答辩通过了，都是涉险过关
+2/432
-
散金币祈福
+5/343
-
货币银行学通俗教材版（一部超越哈耶克的经济学）
+1/249
-
【毕业前夕，畅谈科研】文集
+1/163
-
今日少年明日老。
+1/99
-
很认可这句话
+1/99
-
原子层沉积（ALD）磁控溅射PECVD等微纳代工服务：18817872921
+1/94
-
厦门大学崔明旭课题组招收2027届推免硕士/直博与申请考核博士生（金属有机、高分子）
+1/33
-
招收CSC博士生（2027年9月入学）
+1/8
-
香港科技大学(广州) 强化学习、机器人、具身智能方向等方向硕博-27 spring fall
+1/7
-
南京航空航天大学激光焊接与再制造技术研究所招收2027年博士研究生
+1/6
-
2026年工程管理与智慧城市国际会议 (EMSC 2026)
+1/4
-
项目助理招聘启事
+1/2
-
天津大学李轶：氢键有机框架：无贵金属原位产双氧水，实现自供电污水深度净化
+1/2
-
寻求合作【出版代理】兼职推广｜无需坐班｜一单5000元
+1/2
-
专利审查意见答复，是AI辅助生成中很难的一个功能...
+1/2
-
寻求合作【大学教师】兼职出版顾问｜无需坐班｜一单5000元
+1/1
-
厦大化院海优团队招收2027级【博士】和【推免硕士】研究生各2名
+1/1
19楼2011-06-27 20:03:54
2楼2011-06-27 17:42:57
3楼2011-06-27 17:48:24
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
|
Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. 可能是编辑搞错了，楼上说的对，你仔细核对一下 |
4楼2011-06-27 17:50:21
简单回复
2011-06-27 18:00
