| 查看: 16767 | 回复: 63 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Crystal Growth & Design小修后被拒，大家帮我分析一下怎么回事?
|
|||
|
前一段时间我投了一篇Crystal Growth & Design，第一次修改是大修，我修改后，编辑又让我小修，小修时编辑和审稿人的回信是这样的 The reviews for your manuscript are enclosed with this letter. Please consider the reviewers' comments. They have raised points that require consideration and revision of the manuscript before it is suitable for publication. However, with adequate response and revision, the manuscript should be acceptable for publication in Crystal Growth & Design. We would like to receive your revision as soon as possible, 90 days at the latest. We look forward to seeing your paper in Crystal Growth & Design. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after minor revision. Comments: In this revised version, the authors have taken into account most of the reviewers' comment and I find it publishable. My only comment concerns the data listed in Table 2: I do not believe that one can determine them with such an accuracy; uncertainties should be evaluated. 小修我投上去过了25天还是没有消息，我实在等不住了，就给编辑发了一封催稿信，结果两天以后收到编辑的拒稿信，信得内容如下： Thank you for considering Crystal Growth & Design for your manuscript submission. Due to the large number of manuscripts submitted to our journal and the increased demands that are being placed on our reviewers, we must assess closely, and prior to external review by expert specialists, whether a manuscript fits within the scope of the Journal and whether it will have sufficient appeal to a significant segment of our readership. Manuscripts that are not within the scope of the Journal (see http://pubs.acs.org/page/cgdefu/about.html) or do not provide clear evidence for a significant advance that is likely to be of broad interest to the crystal growth or crystal engineering communities, will not be considered further for publication. In my view, your manuscript does not meet these standards and therefore, I regret that we cannot consider it further for publication. Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. Thank you again for submitting your manuscript to Crystal Growth & Design. I hope that you will continue to consider our journal for publication of your papers in the future. 这是怎么回事呀？请各位虫友帮我分析一下啊，好郁闷呀，我感觉我很认真的按照审稿人的意见修改了，怎么还是杯具了！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
一志愿哈尔滨工业大学材料与化工方向336分
已经有5人回复
-
0856材料化工调剂 总分330
已经有9人回复
-
085602 化工专硕 338分 求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
352分 化工与材料
已经有4人回复
-
求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
材料求调剂 一志愿哈工大总分298分，前三科223分
已经有3人回复
-
材料求调剂一志愿哈工大324
已经有4人回复
-
085600 286分 材料求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
275求调剂
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 帮我看看这断口怎么分析？多谢。
已经有13人回复
- 请大家帮我分析下该去法国还是去澳大利亚？
已经有37人回复
- 文章小修后被拒，然后又被接收的曲折之路，散金币！
已经有212人回复
- 有没有小修后被拒的？
已经有39人回复
- 对比CrystEngComm和Crystal Growth & Design
已经有11人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 投稿Crystal Growth & Design
已经有34人回复
- crystal growth and design审稿周期多长啊，着急。
已经有7人回复
- 求助crystal growth & design投稿 需要的晶体个数？
已经有5人回复
- 大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修？希望大吗？（散50B，每人2个）
已经有68人回复
- Crystal Growth and Design 小修中的两个棘手问题。
已经有10人回复
- 被tetrahetron拒稿，大家帮我分析一下！
已经有3人回复
- crystal growth design 审稿大家都是多长时间
已经有13人回复
- 投稿Journal of Crystal Growth被拒，一句内容没看懂，麻烦哪位帮忙解释一下。
已经有16人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
基金祈福
+3/1685
-
山东建筑大学材料类研究生招生调剂
+3/197
-
老虫子的注册小木虫18周年大礼包
+5/150
-
香港中文大学（深圳）靳羽华教授交叉实验室招募2026年材料学博士生（光致变色）
+2/122
-
山东建筑大学 （市政与环境工程学院）硕士研究生招生啦 静电纺丝纤维与盐水分离应用
+1/88
-
上海电力大学先进储能电池技术课题组招生
+1/81
-
中飞院航空锂电池团队接受硕士生调剂
+1/74
-
福建农林大学材料院招收调剂硕士生
+1/37
-
【211博士招生】环境化学、地学、毒理方向，擅长污染物迁移转化降解、计算模拟者优先
+1/33
-
长安大学智能爆破课题组招收2026级博士和硕士研究生
+1/24
-
济南大学水利与环境学院赵艳侠教授简介
+1/23
-
年薪约32-60万！成会明院士团队诚聘材料理论计算博士后（长期有效）
+1/15
-
中科院物理所二维材料方向招收推免研究生
+1/13
-
青岛科技大学0860 调剂招生
+1/13
-
中国地质大学（北京)工程技术学院安老师组招收2026调剂生
+1/9
-
广东医科大学 李雪萌教授团队 招收申请考核制博士（临床检验诊断）
+1/6
-
墨尔本大学伯明翰大学联合全奖国际博士生
+1/5
-
5科大招收材料专业硕士
+1/3
-
中国科学技术大学纳米科学技术学院张振教授/江雷院士诚招2026级博士
+1/3
-
广东工业大学环境科学与工程学院招收资源与环境专业博士研究生
+1/1
16楼2011-06-27 19:45:31
2楼2011-06-27 17:42:57
3楼2011-06-27 17:48:24
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
|
Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. 可能是编辑搞错了，楼上说的对，你仔细核对一下 |
4楼2011-06-27 17:50:21
简单回复
2011-06-27 18:00
