| 查看: 16771 | 回复: 63 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Crystal Growth & Design小修后被拒，大家帮我分析一下怎么回事?
|
|||
|
前一段时间我投了一篇Crystal Growth & Design，第一次修改是大修，我修改后，编辑又让我小修，小修时编辑和审稿人的回信是这样的 The reviews for your manuscript are enclosed with this letter. Please consider the reviewers' comments. They have raised points that require consideration and revision of the manuscript before it is suitable for publication. However, with adequate response and revision, the manuscript should be acceptable for publication in Crystal Growth & Design. We would like to receive your revision as soon as possible, 90 days at the latest. We look forward to seeing your paper in Crystal Growth & Design. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after minor revision. Comments: In this revised version, the authors have taken into account most of the reviewers' comment and I find it publishable. My only comment concerns the data listed in Table 2: I do not believe that one can determine them with such an accuracy; uncertainties should be evaluated. 小修我投上去过了25天还是没有消息，我实在等不住了，就给编辑发了一封催稿信，结果两天以后收到编辑的拒稿信，信得内容如下： Thank you for considering Crystal Growth & Design for your manuscript submission. Due to the large number of manuscripts submitted to our journal and the increased demands that are being placed on our reviewers, we must assess closely, and prior to external review by expert specialists, whether a manuscript fits within the scope of the Journal and whether it will have sufficient appeal to a significant segment of our readership. Manuscripts that are not within the scope of the Journal (see http://pubs.acs.org/page/cgdefu/about.html) or do not provide clear evidence for a significant advance that is likely to be of broad interest to the crystal growth or crystal engineering communities, will not be considered further for publication. In my view, your manuscript does not meet these standards and therefore, I regret that we cannot consider it further for publication. Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. Thank you again for submitting your manuscript to Crystal Growth & Design. I hope that you will continue to consider our journal for publication of your papers in the future. 这是怎么回事呀？请各位虫友帮我分析一下啊，好郁闷呀，我感觉我很认真的按照审稿人的意见修改了，怎么还是杯具了！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料求调剂 一志愿哈工大总分298分，前三科223分
已经有5人回复
-
085600 286分 材料求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
086502化学工程342求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
材料求调剂一志愿哈工大324
已经有7人回复
-
328求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
340求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
一志愿南昌大学324求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
求调剂推荐 材料 304
已经有15人回复
-
291求调剂
已经有19人回复
-
331环境科学与工程求调剂
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 帮我看看这断口怎么分析？多谢。
已经有13人回复
- 请大家帮我分析下该去法国还是去澳大利亚？
已经有37人回复
- 文章小修后被拒，然后又被接收的曲折之路，散金币！
已经有212人回复
- 有没有小修后被拒的？
已经有39人回复
- 对比CrystEngComm和Crystal Growth & Design
已经有11人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 投稿Crystal Growth & Design
已经有34人回复
- crystal growth and design审稿周期多长啊，着急。
已经有7人回复
- 求助crystal growth & design投稿 需要的晶体个数？
已经有5人回复
- 大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修？希望大吗？（散50B，每人2个）
已经有68人回复
- Crystal Growth and Design 小修中的两个棘手问题。
已经有10人回复
- 被tetrahetron拒稿，大家帮我分析一下！
已经有3人回复
- crystal growth design 审稿大家都是多长时间
已经有13人回复
- 投稿Journal of Crystal Growth被拒，一句内容没看懂，麻烦哪位帮忙解释一下。
已经有16人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
数一英一硕士调剂（双一流高校）
+1/184
-
希望面上好运
+2/138
-
香港中文大学（深圳）靳羽华教授交叉实验室招募2026年材料学博士生（光致变色）
+2/122
-
中山大学附属医院实验和生信科研助理招聘
+1/79
-
中飞院航空锂电池团队接受硕士生调剂
+1/74
-
招收材料相关硕士研究生
+2/40
-
西华大学材料学院表面科学与工程技术科研团队2026年招收研究生
+1/33
-
澳大利亚昆士兰大学化工学院招收全奖博士生2名
+1/26
-
上海中医药大学创新中药研究院 招收审核制博士生一名
+1/17
-
化工毕业三年转电子信息可行吗？？各位同行前辈
+1/16
-
南京林业大学-国家级青年人才团队 招2026级博士、硕士（合成化学、植物化学方向）
+1/11
-
中国地震局地质研究所+地球物理专业+接收调剂
+1/11
-
三峡大学材料与化工学院调剂
+1/10
-
港科大（广州）招收光学传感器，集成电路设计，医学影像设备以及可穿戴设备方向的博士
+1/9
-
长江师范学院化学化工学院2026年硕士研究生接收调剂的通知
+1/8
-
南京林业大学化学工程学院柏惺峰课题组招收硕士研究生1名
+1/6
-
武汉纺织大学沈爱国教授团队招收化学、生物、材料专业研究生
+1/5
-
5科大招收材料专业硕士
+1/3
-
招聘硕博生：基于机器学习和人工智能的结构/合金设计-西安交大
+1/3
-
欧洲手性光谱方向ROA/CPL/Raman imaging招收博士研究生及联合培养生（布拉格）
+1/1
10楼2011-06-27 18:11:24
2楼2011-06-27 17:42:57
3楼2011-06-27 17:48:24
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
|
Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. 可能是编辑搞错了，楼上说的对，你仔细核对一下 |
4楼2011-06-27 17:50:21
简单回复
2011-06-27 18:00
