| 查看: 16744 | 回复: 63 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Crystal Growth & Design小修后被拒，大家帮我分析一下怎么回事?
|
|||
|
前一段时间我投了一篇Crystal Growth & Design，第一次修改是大修，我修改后，编辑又让我小修，小修时编辑和审稿人的回信是这样的 The reviews for your manuscript are enclosed with this letter. Please consider the reviewers' comments. They have raised points that require consideration and revision of the manuscript before it is suitable for publication. However, with adequate response and revision, the manuscript should be acceptable for publication in Crystal Growth & Design. We would like to receive your revision as soon as possible, 90 days at the latest. We look forward to seeing your paper in Crystal Growth & Design. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after minor revision. Comments: In this revised version, the authors have taken into account most of the reviewers' comment and I find it publishable. My only comment concerns the data listed in Table 2: I do not believe that one can determine them with such an accuracy; uncertainties should be evaluated. 小修我投上去过了25天还是没有消息，我实在等不住了，就给编辑发了一封催稿信，结果两天以后收到编辑的拒稿信，信得内容如下： Thank you for considering Crystal Growth & Design for your manuscript submission. Due to the large number of manuscripts submitted to our journal and the increased demands that are being placed on our reviewers, we must assess closely, and prior to external review by expert specialists, whether a manuscript fits within the scope of the Journal and whether it will have sufficient appeal to a significant segment of our readership. Manuscripts that are not within the scope of the Journal (see http://pubs.acs.org/page/cgdefu/about.html) or do not provide clear evidence for a significant advance that is likely to be of broad interest to the crystal growth or crystal engineering communities, will not be considered further for publication. In my view, your manuscript does not meet these standards and therefore, I regret that we cannot consider it further for publication. Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. Thank you again for submitting your manuscript to Crystal Growth & Design. I hope that you will continue to consider our journal for publication of your papers in the future. 这是怎么回事呀？请各位虫友帮我分析一下啊，好郁闷呀，我感觉我很认真的按照审稿人的意见修改了，怎么还是杯具了！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
266分，求材料冶金能源化工等调剂
已经有5人回复
-
265求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
320分，材料与化工专业，求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
高温高压反应求助
已经有4人回复
-
085701环境工程求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
285求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
265求调剂11408
已经有3人回复
-
085701环境工程，267求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
学硕274求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
291求调剂
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 帮我看看这断口怎么分析？多谢。
已经有13人回复
- 请大家帮我分析下该去法国还是去澳大利亚？
已经有37人回复
- 文章小修后被拒，然后又被接收的曲折之路，散金币！
已经有212人回复
- 有没有小修后被拒的？
已经有39人回复
- 对比CrystEngComm和Crystal Growth & Design
已经有11人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 投稿Crystal Growth & Design
已经有34人回复
- crystal growth and design审稿周期多长啊，着急。
已经有7人回复
- 求助crystal growth & design投稿 需要的晶体个数？
已经有5人回复
- 大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修？希望大吗？（散50B，每人2个）
已经有68人回复
- Crystal Growth and Design 小修中的两个棘手问题。
已经有10人回复
- 被tetrahetron拒稿，大家帮我分析一下！
已经有3人回复
- crystal growth design 审稿大家都是多长时间
已经有13人回复
- 投稿Journal of Crystal Growth被拒，一句内容没看懂，麻烦哪位帮忙解释一下。
已经有16人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
马尔文激光粒度+纳米粒径Zeta电位测试原始数据与Origin绘图V131/2039/8821
+1/91
-
西南交通大学医学院招收生物医学工程和材料与化工专业硕士研究生
+1/85
-
上海高校招收化学，材料，环境，化工等专业基础的同学攻读硕士研究生
+1/82
-
江南大学招收具有3年海外博后经历的青年教师
+1/80
-
重庆交通大学院士团队招收材料、能源动力专业硕士研究生
+2/50
-
西京学院土木水利 2026 级研究生招生
+2/48
-
华南理工大学周奕彤老师课题组招收2026级博士生-外骨骼机器人
+1/46
-
招聘︱国家纳米科学中心丁宝全杰青团队诚聘博士后（特别研究助理）
+2/38
-
哈尔滨工业大学（深圳）-何自开教授团队诚招化学工程与技术专业博士研究生
+1/33
-
济南大学水利与环境学院赵艳侠教授简介
+1/24
-
西华大学材料学院表面科学与工程技术科研团队2026年招收研究生
+1/16
-
三峡大学材化学院能源环保晶态材料课题组接收调剂，招收化学类硕士
+1/11
-
苏州初创公司诚聘化学过程工艺与硬件系统工程师
+1/10
-
南京林业大学化学工程学院柏惺峰课题组招收硕士研究生1名
+1/6
-
武汉纺织大学沈爱国教授团队招收化学、生物、材料专业研究生
+1/5
-
【博士招生】天津理工大学国家杰青王铁课题组招收2026年博士研究生
+1/3
-
招收从事大气复合污染成因领域研究生
+1/3
-
各种IgG抗体表达系统
+1/3
-
福建师范大学环境与资源学院招收2026级硕士生
+1/1
-
双一流高校河南大学量子纳米光子学课题组光学、凝聚态博士招生
+1/1
10楼2011-06-27 18:11:24
2楼2011-06-27 17:42:57
3楼2011-06-27 17:48:24
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-06-27 23:08:43
yanxuhuan(金币+1): 2011-07-14 10:04:53
|
Based on my experience with our reviewers, I believe they would reach the same conclusion. I hope that by returning the manuscript to you quickly without review you can pursue other actions for your manuscript in a timely manner. 可能是编辑搞错了，楼上说的对，你仔细核对一下 |
4楼2011-06-27 17:50:21
简单回复
2011-06-27 18:00
