| 查看: 1405 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
[交流]
急求翻译一段话
|
|||
|
The In2O3 based sensor shows different sensing responses towards various gases. The different diffusivities and reactivity of these gases would be the key factors influencing this issue [28]. The gas transport without external pressure can be described by Knudsen diffusion. According the corresponding model, gas transport occurs mainly by molecular diffusion in macropores (with diameter > 25nm), while surface diffusion becomes predominant in micropores (with diameter < 1 nm). In fact, our In2O3-based sensor contains two kind pores: the pore in the In2O3 nanoplatelets (with diameter 2-4 nm), and the larger pores (gaps) between adjacent In2O3 nanoplatelets (with diameter >>25 nm from the observation of SEM image (Fig. 4a)). It is believed that the gas transport in our In2O3 sensor occurs mainly by molecular diffusion. This indicates the analytes may be able to diffuse similar depth into the In2O3 sensing layer. Therefore, the different diffusivities of the analytes in our sensor would slightly contribute to the sensing response. On the other hand, the reactivity of these analytes would be responsible for the obtained sequence of sensing response. From the ionosorption model [29] of oxide semiconductor gas sensor, reducing gases abstract surface-bound oxygen which immobilized the conduction electron, thereby release immobilized electron into the crystal and induce the change of the conductivity of the sensor. These analytes have different ability to abstract surface-bound oxygen, and so showing different sensing response. In addition, the different reaction kinetics of these analytes may be another factor resulting in the different sensing response. We believe that the compositive influence of these aspects of the analytes induces the consequence of the sensing responses. The gas sensing superiority of our prepared porous In2O3 nanoplatelets is easily understood. From the theoretical simulation and experimental results, the sensor response could remarkably increase as the average crystallite size decreased to below 20 nm, which is about twice the thickness of electron depletion layer [30-33]. The thickness of our prepared In2O3 nanoplatelets is below 6 nm, which is much thinner than twice the thickness of electron depletion layer. That is obviously beneficial to the enhancement of sensing performance. Secondly, our prepared In2O3 nanoplatelets are of single crystalline and porous feature. The carrier transport is easy in the single crystalline structure. It is believed that not only the electrons are easily depleted but also the sensor has higher stability owing to the high crystallinity of the sensing materials. Furthermore, bigger accessible surface together with convenient transport of gas can be benefited from the porous structure [28]. Comparatively, the commercial In2O3 with bigger size has much lower sensitivity. Thirdly, the unique 2-D nanostructures are stable [34-36]. They are effective in mitigating the strong agglomeration between nanoplatelets. As revealed by the reported sensing mechanism, the resistance of the sensing film is controlled by the internanocrystal barrier at the contacts, and the sensitivity results mainly from the barrier modulation at the contacts by gas [37]. A distinct characteristic of the sensing film composed of In2O3 nanoplatelets is that most of the contacts between them are face-face contacts, which has large contact area with most of them contributing to the sensing. This is in contrast to other structure such as nanospheres or nanowires [38]. In addition, our prepared In2O3 nanoplatelets are bound by {110} planes with higher energy, which would have higher gas adsorption and reactivity [4, 19, 20]. Therefore, the In2O3 nanoplatelets possess a good sensing performance and would be promising candidates for fabricating high performance gas sensors. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
0857调剂
已经有3人回复
-
材料学调剂
已经有11人回复
-
材料类求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
高分子化学与物理调剂
已经有11人回复
-
26申博
已经有6人回复
-
328求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
化工专硕348，一志愿985求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
0856求调剂285
已经有8人回复
-
290求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
281求调剂
已经有7人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
希望文章能接收
+1/279
-
东北石油大学三亚海洋油气研究院【硕士招生】【地质资源与地质工程】【地质学】
+1/79
-
艾里卡特 (Alicat) 本安ia防爆型质量流量控制器应用于电解制氢
+2/68
-
湖南大学材料院陶益杰老师招收2026年秋季入学博士生一名-超材料方向
+1/33
-
中山大学公卫学院招收2026年4月申请-考核制的博士生补录取（化学生物学、蛋白质组学）
+3/25
-
【加拿大卡尔顿大学】招博士生【心理学人工智能】
+1/15
-
26届 || 计算机、电子信息类、电科、控制、通信考研T j信息醇：74o8 766 2o
+1/15
-
加拿大卡尔顿大学【招博后】【心理学人工智能】
+1/12
-
南京林业大学-国家级青年人才团队 招2026级申请考核制博士
+1/11
-
安徽农业大学许云辉教授课题组招收材料类、化工类、医学类等工科专硕学硕考研调剂
+1/10
-
坐标南京，高校老师，诚征女友
+1/9
-
中国科学院国家级人才团队博士后招聘启示
+1/8
-
“教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划”入选团队招收材料，化学与化工博士研究生
+1/8
-
电子科技大学材料学院可持续发展未来技术创新中心招收博士生及科研助理
+1/7
-
西安工程大学环境与化学工程学院26年硕士研究生招生咨询
+1/4
-
2026申博自荐
+1/3
-
中科院深圳先进技术研究院成会明院士/唐永炳杰青团队拟招聘博士后若干名。
+1/3
-
济南大学耿兵氟化学课题组现招收2026级化学工程学硕专硕共4名
+1/3
-
陕西科技大学招生学术博士生1名(锂钠离子电池/光电催化/环境功能材料/热电材料)
+1/1
-
深圳大学何传新课题组诚聘“百人计划”（副）教授、助理教授
+1/1
2楼2011-03-31 17:13:45
3楼2011-04-01 09:24:11
4楼2011-04-01 09:44:28
雪夕(金币+20, 翻译EPI+1): 2011-04-05 10:43:15
|
面对各种气体，氧化铟传感器的传感响应表现均不一样。这些气体的不同的扩散率和反应活性本文的影响都有着重要影响[28]。Knudsen扩散描述了，气体运输不需要外力就可以进行。根据相应的模型、气体运输的发生是通过大孔隙（ 直径>25nm）的分子扩散,而表面扩散主要通过微孔的方式扩散(直径< 1纳米)。事实上,我们的氧化铟传感器包含两种气孔:孔隙直径如氧化铟纳米级(2-4纳米),和更大的气孔(空白)相邻氧化铟纳米级 (直径> >25纳米 从观测的扫描电镜照片得出(图4)）。此举被认为在我们的氧化铟传感器的气体运输主要是分子扩散的形式。这表明这一过程可以扩散到类似的深度氧化铟感应层。因此,不同的样本扩散率传感器会稍微有助于传感响应。 另一方面,这些样本的反应性将负责在获得传感响应序列。从ionosorption模型(29)的氧化物半导体气敏传感器得知,减少气体中表面范围上提取的氧气,能固定化传导电子,从而释放固定电子进入入晶体和导致电导率传感器的改变。这些样品有不同的能力提取表面范围上的氧气,所以表达不同传感响应。此外,不同的反应动力学的这些样品可能成为另一个因素导致不同的传感响应。我们相信,样品各方面的综合的影响最终导致传感反应的最终结果。 我们准备好的有气孔的纳米级氧化铟的气体传感优势比较通俗易懂。从理论模拟和实验结果表明,该传感器响应可显著的增加。 |
5楼2011-04-03 18:13:46
