| 查看: 1420 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
急求翻译一段话
|
|||
|
The In2O3 based sensor shows different sensing responses towards various gases. The different diffusivities and reactivity of these gases would be the key factors influencing this issue [28]. The gas transport without external pressure can be described by Knudsen diffusion. According the corresponding model, gas transport occurs mainly by molecular diffusion in macropores (with diameter > 25nm), while surface diffusion becomes predominant in micropores (with diameter < 1 nm). In fact, our In2O3-based sensor contains two kind pores: the pore in the In2O3 nanoplatelets (with diameter 2-4 nm), and the larger pores (gaps) between adjacent In2O3 nanoplatelets (with diameter >>25 nm from the observation of SEM image (Fig. 4a)). It is believed that the gas transport in our In2O3 sensor occurs mainly by molecular diffusion. This indicates the analytes may be able to diffuse similar depth into the In2O3 sensing layer. Therefore, the different diffusivities of the analytes in our sensor would slightly contribute to the sensing response. On the other hand, the reactivity of these analytes would be responsible for the obtained sequence of sensing response. From the ionosorption model [29] of oxide semiconductor gas sensor, reducing gases abstract surface-bound oxygen which immobilized the conduction electron, thereby release immobilized electron into the crystal and induce the change of the conductivity of the sensor. These analytes have different ability to abstract surface-bound oxygen, and so showing different sensing response. In addition, the different reaction kinetics of these analytes may be another factor resulting in the different sensing response. We believe that the compositive influence of these aspects of the analytes induces the consequence of the sensing responses. The gas sensing superiority of our prepared porous In2O3 nanoplatelets is easily understood. From the theoretical simulation and experimental results, the sensor response could remarkably increase as the average crystallite size decreased to below 20 nm, which is about twice the thickness of electron depletion layer [30-33]. The thickness of our prepared In2O3 nanoplatelets is below 6 nm, which is much thinner than twice the thickness of electron depletion layer. That is obviously beneficial to the enhancement of sensing performance. Secondly, our prepared In2O3 nanoplatelets are of single crystalline and porous feature. The carrier transport is easy in the single crystalline structure. It is believed that not only the electrons are easily depleted but also the sensor has higher stability owing to the high crystallinity of the sensing materials. Furthermore, bigger accessible surface together with convenient transport of gas can be benefited from the porous structure [28]. Comparatively, the commercial In2O3 with bigger size has much lower sensitivity. Thirdly, the unique 2-D nanostructures are stable [34-36]. They are effective in mitigating the strong agglomeration between nanoplatelets. As revealed by the reported sensing mechanism, the resistance of the sensing film is controlled by the internanocrystal barrier at the contacts, and the sensitivity results mainly from the barrier modulation at the contacts by gas [37]. A distinct characteristic of the sensing film composed of In2O3 nanoplatelets is that most of the contacts between them are face-face contacts, which has large contact area with most of them contributing to the sensing. This is in contrast to other structure such as nanospheres or nanowires [38]. In addition, our prepared In2O3 nanoplatelets are bound by {110} planes with higher energy, which would have higher gas adsorption and reactivity [4, 19, 20]. Therefore, the In2O3 nanoplatelets possess a good sensing performance and would be promising candidates for fabricating high performance gas sensors. |
» 猜你喜欢
0703化学求调剂
已经有6人回复
一志愿中南大学化学学硕0703总分337求调剂
已经有6人回复
考研化学308分求调剂
已经有9人回复
求调剂 一志愿 本科 北科大 化学 343
已经有4人回复
一志愿吉林大学材料与化工303分求调剂
已经有3人回复
各位老师您好:本人初试372分
已经有3人回复
B区考研调剂
已经有5人回复
284求调剂
已经有12人回复
求调剂,一志愿:南京航空航天大学大学 ,080500材料科学与工程学硕,总分289分
已经有6人回复
289材料与化工(085600)B区求调剂
已经有5人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
中国散裂中子源诚聘“AI材料计算”方向博士后/职工
+1/426
94年女征男友
+1/271
澳门科技大学创新工程学院诚招博士生
+2/140
福建师范大学叶应祥课题组招收2026级博士研究生
+2/128
海南大学化工院生物质定向转化课题组招收博士/硕士,2026年9月入学
+1/80
浙江大学侯阳教授团队诚聘博士后---高性能固态电解质与固态电池器件设计
+1/76
西北大学化学与材料科学学院博士招生(还有两个名额,3月30日截至)
+1/63
散金币,求基金中标!!
+1/58
招收2026年材料与化工专硕调剂,山东省属重点大学,过国家线即可调剂,名额充足
+2/42
北京某研究院结构生物学相关专业接收调剂研究生
+1/29
浙江大学光电学院、极端光学实验室 阿秒方向 招聘科研助理2名
+1/20
双一流大学湘潭大学“化工过程模拟与强化”国家地方联合工程研究中心招收各类博士生
+1/17
双一流大学湘潭大学“化工过程模拟与强化”国家地方联合工程研究中心招收博士生
+1/17
---大龄的未婚男找结婚女对象
+1/14
西南某211招27届博士
+1/10
shu湘潭大学化工学院招收化工、能源动力、工程热物理相关研究生调剂
+1/8
【第三轮招生】澳科大诚招2026年秋季药剂学硕士研究生(3月31日下午18:00截止)
+1/5
天津大学浙江研究院(宁波)诚聘高分子/化学/材料/石化方向博士后
+1/4
085602调剂
+1/3
中国石油大学(北京)国家领军人才团队招收石油与天然工程专业方向博士生1-2名
+1/2
雪夕(金币+20, 翻译EPI+1): 2011-04-05 10:43:15
|
面对各种气体,氧化铟传感器的传感响应表现均不一样。这些气体的不同的扩散率和反应活性本文的影响都有着重要影响[28]。Knudsen扩散描述了,气体运输不需要外力就可以进行。根据相应的模型、气体运输的发生是通过大孔隙( 直径>25nm)的分子扩散,而表面扩散主要通过微孔的方式扩散(直径< 1纳米)。事实上,我们的氧化铟传感器包含两种气孔:孔隙直径如氧化铟纳米级(2-4纳米),和更大的气孔(空白)相邻氧化铟纳米级 (直径> >25纳米 从观测的扫描电镜照片得出(图4))。此举被认为在我们的氧化铟传感器的气体运输主要是分子扩散的形式。这表明这一过程可以扩散到类似的深度氧化铟感应层。因此,不同的样本扩散率传感器会稍微有助于传感响应。 另一方面,这些样本的反应性将负责在获得传感响应序列。从ionosorption模型(29)的氧化物半导体气敏传感器得知,减少气体中表面范围上提取的氧气,能固定化传导电子,从而释放固定电子进入入晶体和导致电导率传感器的改变。这些样品有不同的能力提取表面范围上的氧气,所以表达不同传感响应。此外,不同的反应动力学的这些样品可能成为另一个因素导致不同的传感响应。我们相信,样品各方面的综合的影响最终导致传感反应的最终结果。 我们准备好的有气孔的纳米级氧化铟的气体传感优势比较通俗易懂。从理论模拟和实验结果表明,该传感器响应可显著的增加。 |
5楼2011-04-03 18:13:46
2楼2011-03-31 17:13:45
3楼2011-04-01 09:24:11
4楼2011-04-01 09:44:28













回复此楼
