| 查看: 1426 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
[交流]
急求翻译一段话
|
|||
|
The In2O3 based sensor shows different sensing responses towards various gases. The different diffusivities and reactivity of these gases would be the key factors influencing this issue [28]. The gas transport without external pressure can be described by Knudsen diffusion. According the corresponding model, gas transport occurs mainly by molecular diffusion in macropores (with diameter > 25nm), while surface diffusion becomes predominant in micropores (with diameter < 1 nm). In fact, our In2O3-based sensor contains two kind pores: the pore in the In2O3 nanoplatelets (with diameter 2-4 nm), and the larger pores (gaps) between adjacent In2O3 nanoplatelets (with diameter >>25 nm from the observation of SEM image (Fig. 4a)). It is believed that the gas transport in our In2O3 sensor occurs mainly by molecular diffusion. This indicates the analytes may be able to diffuse similar depth into the In2O3 sensing layer. Therefore, the different diffusivities of the analytes in our sensor would slightly contribute to the sensing response. On the other hand, the reactivity of these analytes would be responsible for the obtained sequence of sensing response. From the ionosorption model [29] of oxide semiconductor gas sensor, reducing gases abstract surface-bound oxygen which immobilized the conduction electron, thereby release immobilized electron into the crystal and induce the change of the conductivity of the sensor. These analytes have different ability to abstract surface-bound oxygen, and so showing different sensing response. In addition, the different reaction kinetics of these analytes may be another factor resulting in the different sensing response. We believe that the compositive influence of these aspects of the analytes induces the consequence of the sensing responses. The gas sensing superiority of our prepared porous In2O3 nanoplatelets is easily understood. From the theoretical simulation and experimental results, the sensor response could remarkably increase as the average crystallite size decreased to below 20 nm, which is about twice the thickness of electron depletion layer [30-33]. The thickness of our prepared In2O3 nanoplatelets is below 6 nm, which is much thinner than twice the thickness of electron depletion layer. That is obviously beneficial to the enhancement of sensing performance. Secondly, our prepared In2O3 nanoplatelets are of single crystalline and porous feature. The carrier transport is easy in the single crystalline structure. It is believed that not only the electrons are easily depleted but also the sensor has higher stability owing to the high crystallinity of the sensing materials. Furthermore, bigger accessible surface together with convenient transport of gas can be benefited from the porous structure [28]. Comparatively, the commercial In2O3 with bigger size has much lower sensitivity. Thirdly, the unique 2-D nanostructures are stable [34-36]. They are effective in mitigating the strong agglomeration between nanoplatelets. As revealed by the reported sensing mechanism, the resistance of the sensing film is controlled by the internanocrystal barrier at the contacts, and the sensitivity results mainly from the barrier modulation at the contacts by gas [37]. A distinct characteristic of the sensing film composed of In2O3 nanoplatelets is that most of the contacts between them are face-face contacts, which has large contact area with most of them contributing to the sensing. This is in contrast to other structure such as nanospheres or nanowires [38]. In addition, our prepared In2O3 nanoplatelets are bound by {110} planes with higher energy, which would have higher gas adsorption and reactivity [4, 19, 20]. Therefore, the In2O3 nanoplatelets possess a good sensing performance and would be promising candidates for fabricating high performance gas sensors. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
317求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
复试调剂，一志愿南农083200食品科学与工程
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿太原理工安全工程300分，求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
284求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
食品工程专硕求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
324求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
一志愿武汉理工，总分321，英一数二，求老师收留。
已经有4人回复
-
287求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
325求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
343求调剂
已经有4人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
西南交通大学医学院招收生物医学工程和材料与化工专业硕士研究生
+1/183
-
中国科学院青岛生物能源与过程研究所 招生2-3名联培生
+1/179
-
南京医科大学生殖医学与子代健康国重实验室-董飞宏课题组-2026年博士招生-9月入学
+1/82
-
资源与环境专硕
+1/73
-
欢迎环境科学与工程、水利工程专业研究生加入北师大珠海校区董越课题组
+2/56
-
国家双一流高校-国家级青年人才课题组博士招生
+2/50
-
中山大学生医工学院课题组招硕士生（纳米材料/高分子/分析传感/荧光免疫检测背景）
+2/40
-
北京理工大学-化学与化工学院-招收2026级博士生 [申请-考核制]
+1/32
-
春眠不觉晓
+1/19
-
北京石油化工学院智能防腐涂层课题组招收2026级调剂研究生
+1/16
-
双一流大学湘潭大学“化工过程模拟与强化”国家地方联合工程研究中心招收各类博士生
+1/16
-
西安工程大学环境与化学工程学院能源环境催化与先进材料课题组招生
+1/16
-
诚挚招生（硕士+博士）
+1/9
-
港科大（广州）招收光学传感器，集成电路设计，医学影像设备以及可穿戴设备方向的博士
+1/9
-
中国科学院上海硅酸盐研究所招聘科研助理（纳米材料与生物应用方向）
+1/8
-
墨子实验室理论计算和模拟研究组诚聘海内外优秀人才
+1/8
-
国家双一流高校-国家级青年人才课题组博士招生
+1/8
-
双一流天津工业大学电信学院李鸿强教授招收2026年申请审核制博士
+1/5
-
Top-88悉尼科技大学数据科学/AI 招收2027年入学 校奖 博士生1到2名(国际和本地学生）
+1/5
-
湘潭大学教师招聘
+1/1
2楼2011-03-31 17:13:45
3楼2011-04-01 09:24:11
4楼2011-04-01 09:44:28
雪夕(金币+20, 翻译EPI+1): 2011-04-05 10:43:15
|
面对各种气体，氧化铟传感器的传感响应表现均不一样。这些气体的不同的扩散率和反应活性本文的影响都有着重要影响[28]。Knudsen扩散描述了，气体运输不需要外力就可以进行。根据相应的模型、气体运输的发生是通过大孔隙（ 直径>25nm）的分子扩散,而表面扩散主要通过微孔的方式扩散(直径< 1纳米)。事实上,我们的氧化铟传感器包含两种气孔:孔隙直径如氧化铟纳米级(2-4纳米),和更大的气孔(空白)相邻氧化铟纳米级 (直径> >25纳米 从观测的扫描电镜照片得出(图4)）。此举被认为在我们的氧化铟传感器的气体运输主要是分子扩散的形式。这表明这一过程可以扩散到类似的深度氧化铟感应层。因此,不同的样本扩散率传感器会稍微有助于传感响应。 另一方面,这些样本的反应性将负责在获得传感响应序列。从ionosorption模型(29)的氧化物半导体气敏传感器得知,减少气体中表面范围上提取的氧气,能固定化传导电子,从而释放固定电子进入入晶体和导致电导率传感器的改变。这些样品有不同的能力提取表面范围上的氧气,所以表达不同传感响应。此外,不同的反应动力学的这些样品可能成为另一个因素导致不同的传感响应。我们相信,样品各方面的综合的影响最终导致传感反应的最终结果。 我们准备好的有气孔的纳米级氧化铟的气体传感优势比较通俗易懂。从理论模拟和实验结果表明,该传感器响应可显著的增加。 |
5楼2011-04-03 18:13:46
