| 查看: 1430 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
[交流]
急求翻译一段话
|
|||
|
The In2O3 based sensor shows different sensing responses towards various gases. The different diffusivities and reactivity of these gases would be the key factors influencing this issue [28]. The gas transport without external pressure can be described by Knudsen diffusion. According the corresponding model, gas transport occurs mainly by molecular diffusion in macropores (with diameter > 25nm), while surface diffusion becomes predominant in micropores (with diameter < 1 nm). In fact, our In2O3-based sensor contains two kind pores: the pore in the In2O3 nanoplatelets (with diameter 2-4 nm), and the larger pores (gaps) between adjacent In2O3 nanoplatelets (with diameter >>25 nm from the observation of SEM image (Fig. 4a)). It is believed that the gas transport in our In2O3 sensor occurs mainly by molecular diffusion. This indicates the analytes may be able to diffuse similar depth into the In2O3 sensing layer. Therefore, the different diffusivities of the analytes in our sensor would slightly contribute to the sensing response. On the other hand, the reactivity of these analytes would be responsible for the obtained sequence of sensing response. From the ionosorption model [29] of oxide semiconductor gas sensor, reducing gases abstract surface-bound oxygen which immobilized the conduction electron, thereby release immobilized electron into the crystal and induce the change of the conductivity of the sensor. These analytes have different ability to abstract surface-bound oxygen, and so showing different sensing response. In addition, the different reaction kinetics of these analytes may be another factor resulting in the different sensing response. We believe that the compositive influence of these aspects of the analytes induces the consequence of the sensing responses. The gas sensing superiority of our prepared porous In2O3 nanoplatelets is easily understood. From the theoretical simulation and experimental results, the sensor response could remarkably increase as the average crystallite size decreased to below 20 nm, which is about twice the thickness of electron depletion layer [30-33]. The thickness of our prepared In2O3 nanoplatelets is below 6 nm, which is much thinner than twice the thickness of electron depletion layer. That is obviously beneficial to the enhancement of sensing performance. Secondly, our prepared In2O3 nanoplatelets are of single crystalline and porous feature. The carrier transport is easy in the single crystalline structure. It is believed that not only the electrons are easily depleted but also the sensor has higher stability owing to the high crystallinity of the sensing materials. Furthermore, bigger accessible surface together with convenient transport of gas can be benefited from the porous structure [28]. Comparatively, the commercial In2O3 with bigger size has much lower sensitivity. Thirdly, the unique 2-D nanostructures are stable [34-36]. They are effective in mitigating the strong agglomeration between nanoplatelets. As revealed by the reported sensing mechanism, the resistance of the sensing film is controlled by the internanocrystal barrier at the contacts, and the sensitivity results mainly from the barrier modulation at the contacts by gas [37]. A distinct characteristic of the sensing film composed of In2O3 nanoplatelets is that most of the contacts between them are face-face contacts, which has large contact area with most of them contributing to the sensing. This is in contrast to other structure such as nanospheres or nanowires [38]. In addition, our prepared In2O3 nanoplatelets are bound by {110} planes with higher energy, which would have higher gas adsorption and reactivity [4, 19, 20]. Therefore, the In2O3 nanoplatelets possess a good sensing performance and would be promising candidates for fabricating high performance gas sensors. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
本科双非材料，跨考一志愿华电085801电气，283求调剂，任何专业都可以
已经有5人回复
-
085600，材料与化工321分求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿中南大学化学0703总分337求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
394求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
一志愿北京工业大学，324分求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
一志愿厦门大学化学学硕307求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
压国家一区线，求导师收留，有恩必谢！
已经有6人回复
-
化学0703 调剂 306分 一志愿211
已经有3人回复
-
317分 一志愿南理工材料工程 本科湖工大 求调剂
已经有6人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所博士后招聘
+1/282
-
山东建筑大学材料类研究生招生调剂
+3/194
-
中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所张旭志课题组招聘 柔性传感器研究 科研助理
+2/140
-
西南交通大学医学院招收生物医学工程和材料与化工专业硕士研究生
+1/85
-
中原食品实验室 & 郑州轻工业大学2026年硕士研究生联合培养调剂公告
+1/39
-
华南理工大学周奕彤老师课题组招收2026级博士生-外骨骼机器人
+1/39
-
中国石油大学（北京）国家级大人才团队博士招生1名：化学、材料、石油工程：油田化学
+1/38
-
南京林业大学化工院有机合成方向硕士招调剂
+1/14
-
课题组招收专业代码08开头的学硕！
+1/9
-
三峡大学 计算力学课题组招收调剂
+1/7
-
【博士招生】广东工业大学国家优青课题组招收2026年环境方向博士生
+1/7
-
澳门理工大学2026人工智能药物发现博士（奖学金+申请考核）
+1/5
-
墨尔本大学伯明翰大学联合全奖国际博士生
+1/5
-
中国科学院大学纳米科学与技术学院-罗聃课题组诚招硕士研究生
+1/5
-
大湾区大学张效勇课题组诚招理论和计算化学方向2026级博士研究生和博士后
+1/5
-
26博士申请
+1/5
-
三峡大学材化学院磷硅精细化工课题组招收化学类、材料类、材料与化工类硕士
+1/5
-
寻找26博士生导师
+1/4
-
中科院科研助理招聘
+1/3
-
环境微生物与污染控制研究所招收2026硕士研究生
+1/3
2楼2011-03-31 17:13:45
3楼2011-04-01 09:24:11
4楼2011-04-01 09:44:28
雪夕(金币+20, 翻译EPI+1): 2011-04-05 10:43:15
|
面对各种气体，氧化铟传感器的传感响应表现均不一样。这些气体的不同的扩散率和反应活性本文的影响都有着重要影响[28]。Knudsen扩散描述了，气体运输不需要外力就可以进行。根据相应的模型、气体运输的发生是通过大孔隙（ 直径>25nm）的分子扩散,而表面扩散主要通过微孔的方式扩散(直径< 1纳米)。事实上,我们的氧化铟传感器包含两种气孔:孔隙直径如氧化铟纳米级(2-4纳米),和更大的气孔(空白)相邻氧化铟纳米级 (直径> >25纳米 从观测的扫描电镜照片得出(图4)）。此举被认为在我们的氧化铟传感器的气体运输主要是分子扩散的形式。这表明这一过程可以扩散到类似的深度氧化铟感应层。因此,不同的样本扩散率传感器会稍微有助于传感响应。 另一方面,这些样本的反应性将负责在获得传感响应序列。从ionosorption模型(29)的氧化物半导体气敏传感器得知,减少气体中表面范围上提取的氧气,能固定化传导电子,从而释放固定电子进入入晶体和导致电导率传感器的改变。这些样品有不同的能力提取表面范围上的氧气,所以表达不同传感响应。此外,不同的反应动力学的这些样品可能成为另一个因素导致不同的传感响应。我们相信,样品各方面的综合的影响最终导致传感反应的最终结果。 我们准备好的有气孔的纳米级氧化铟的气体传感优势比较通俗易懂。从理论模拟和实验结果表明,该传感器响应可显著的增加。 |
5楼2011-04-03 18:13:46
