| 查看: 5117 | 回复: 25 | |||||
[交流]
【求助】G09荧光光谱例子 运行出错
|
|||||
|
用gaussian09计算乙醛分子在乙醇溶液中的荧光光谱。根据手册,一共分成7个步骤,http://www.gaussian.com/g_tech/g_ur/k_scrf.htm 但是计算到第六步出了问题。 输入文件如下: %chk=06-ac # B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) TD=(Read,NStates=6,Root=1) SCRF=(Solvent=Ethanol,StateSpecific,Read) Geom=Check Guess=Read Acetaldehyde emission state-specific solvation at first excited state optimized geometry 0 1 NonEq=write 出错信息: PCMU: Requested matrix not present on file. Error termination via Lnk1e in /public/g09/l601.exe 请教大家,如何解决这个问题呢? 谢谢! |
» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
高斯及相关软件的使用 | Gaussian模拟光谱 |
» 猜你喜欢
招材料相关专业调剂生
已经有12人回复
同系列相似结构的单层二维COF真空层厚度该如何设置?
已经有0人回复
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有191人回复
APS回稿时找不到投递链接是什么情况?
已经有10人回复
南方科技大学物理系周院院教授2026年博士后招聘
已经有0人回复
上海交通大学陈向洋计算化学课题组诚聘2027级博士研究生
已经有7人回复
26年博士申请自荐-电催化
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
原子荧光光谱测重金属
已经有10人回复
普通分光光度计、荧光分光光度计和荧光光谱仪的区别
已经有4人回复
gaussian 计算得到的荧光光谱选择其最大发射光谱是看f最大对应的吗?
已经有14人回复
G09计算拉曼光谱出错
已经有7人回复
【求助】按照G09说明书计算荧光出错。出在第二步上。
已经有13人回复
【求助】荧光光谱的问题
已经有6人回复
【求助】G09进行荧光光谱计算的例子 出错
已经有5人回复
【求助】g03如何计算吸收光谱和荧光光谱的特征峰,命令如何编写
已经有20人回复
【求助】计算荧光光谱的疑惑,求教!
已经有18人回复
【求助】关于荧光光谱上的倍频峰
已经有17人回复
荧光光谱,磷光光谱,光致发光光谱三者的异同。有效期至2010年6月20日
已经有8人回复
【求助】荧光光谱峰是什么样的?
已经有21人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
东南大学废弃碳资源利用-杰青团队-27级博士生(提前入学)-及博后、科研助理招募
+1/176
东南大学废弃碳资源利用团队(杰青/海优团队)博士后、科研助理及27级博士生招募
+1/128
2026年江西师范大学药学院陈芬儿院士课题组招收智能药学博士生
+2/114
温州医科大学吴平课题组招聘博士后,年薪≥50W/年
+1/79
在广东佛山,等一个她
+1/77
2026年江西师范大学流动化学与工程研究院陈芬儿院士团队化学博士招生
+3/74
生命学部的面地青本子开始分发了么?
+1/61
北京邮电大学电子科学与技术招收博士
+1/40
水处理技术员
+1/30
急招-华南理工大学-26秋季博士生-生物质材料及电池方向
+1/30
西北工业大学物理科学与技术学院-诚聘【AI与光学交叉方向】博士后
+1/30
诚征女友,坐标西安
+1/27
香港大学化学系刘俊治课题组招聘博士后
+1/17
大连理工大学张硕课题组2026年秋季博士生额外招生(补招1人,有机合成/糖化学方向)
+1/14
类器官/器官芯片 有编制研究员
+1/13
港科大广州 - 量子计算全奖PhD招生
+1/11
深圳理工大学-湖南大学项目招收钙钛矿方向博士生
+1/9
吉林大学任雷课题组招机器人和触觉传感方向2026年入学博士生
+1/9
双一流高校南林化学工程学院-国家级青年人才团队招2026级博士(最后一波)
+1/2
南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院院士团队招聘博士后、科研助理
+1/2
2楼2011-01-24 14:30:26
3楼2011-01-24 16:18:28
4楼2011-01-25 09:24:00
★
tandz(金币+1):谢谢参与
zhou2009: 2011-01-26 16:06:12
tandz(金币+1):谢谢参与
zhou2009: 2011-01-26 16:06:12
|
请将StateSpecific关键词改为ExternalIteration,这个是Gaussian 09的一个BUG,我专门写信问过Gaussian公司,这个BUG在B01中已经修正,但是在A01和A02中都存在,所以你需要把这个例子中所有的StateSpecific改为ExternalIteration,这两个关键词作用是一样的,在B01中使用这两个关键词的结果是一致的,但是在A01中和A02中使用StateSpecific,即便能得到结果,比如这个例子中计算吸收光谱那一步,其结果也是错的,它仅仅算了真正的StateSpecific中的第一步而已。 Gaussian公司的回复邮件: Thank you for your inquiry. The problem with the example shown in the manual is related to the "StateSpecific" option. Unfortunately, the "StateSpecific" option was connected incorrectly in the current version of G09, but this will be fixed in the next minor revision. As a workaround, you can use the "ExternalIteration" option instead of the "StateSpecific" option (for both the state specific vertical excitation and the emission state specific solvation). The "ExternalIteration" option is a generalization of the "StateSpecific" option. So, please, try the example in the manual again with the only change of removing "StateSpecific" and adding "ExternalIteration" instead. For example, %nproc=16 %mem=2000mb %chk=06-ac # B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) TD=(Read,NStates=6,Root=1) SCRF=(Solvent=Ethanol,ExternalIteration,Read) Geom=Check Guess=Read Acetaldehyde emission state-specific solvation at first excited state optimized geometry 0 1 NonEq=write |
5楼2011-01-25 10:53:35
7楼2011-01-25 15:01:39
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
-

专家经验: +14 - 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345467
- 帖子: 127554
- 在线: 8880.4小时
- 虫号: 971012
8楼2011-01-25 15:18:40
11楼2011-01-25 15:35:05
12楼2011-01-25 15:56:57
|
您能解释一下那个例子的第6步和第7步吗? 第6步保存non-equilibrium溶剂效应,第7步的B3lyp只是计算能量的,不能像td计算那样给出发射波长,那应该怎样得到发射波长呢? Step 7: Emission to final ground state (part 2). Finally, we compute the ground state energy with non-equibrium solvation, at the excited state geometry and with the static solvation from the excited state. %chk=07-ac # B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) SCRF=(Solvent=Ethanol,Read) Geom=Check Guess=Read Acetaldehyde: ground state non-equilibrium at excited state geometry. 0 1 NonEq=read |
14楼2011-01-26 14:56:41
★
tandz(金币+1):谢谢参与
tandz(金币+1):谢谢参与
|
下面是Gaussian公司关于7步计算中的能量的一个计算的说明,包含了你的问题的答案,供参考: Dear Dr. Zhou, As I was saying in my previous email, the "StateSpecific" option in G09 rev. A.02 is connected incorrectly and it is not producing the results that it is supposed to produce, so please do not use the "StateSpecific" option in G09 rev. A.02. For the absorption/emission example in solution, you need to use the "ExternalIteration" option instead, which does produce the correct results. If you follow the whole example given in the manual but correcting the inputs to have "ExternalIteration" instead of "StateSpecific", you should obtain the following results on each one of the 7 proposed jobs in the example: 1) Energy of ground state optimized geometry in solution: SCF Done: E(RB3LYP) = -153.851761719 A.U. after 1 cycles 2) Vertical excitation (absorption) to first excited state from Linear Response calculation in solution (using ground state optimized geometry from job 1): Excited State 1: Singlet-A" 4.3767 eV 283.28 nm f=0.0000 ... Total Energy, E(TD-HF/TD-KS) = -153.690919717 3) Vertical excitation (absorption) to first excited state from a non-equilibrium state-specific calculation (using "ExternalIteration" in solution (using ground state optimized geometry from job 1):SC-PCM: The total energy including the PCM contribution is -153.687679830 a.u. Taking the difference of this energy minus the ground state energy (job 1), the excitation energy is 277.69 nm. 4) Geometry optimization of first excited state in solution (Final energy): Excited State 1: Singlet-A 3.2076 eV 386.53 nm f=0.0014 ... Total Energy, E(TD-HF/TD-KS) = -153.705918841 5) Frequency calculation to confirm that the geometry optimized in job 4 is a stationary point, and a minimum in the potential energy surface of the excited state. 6) Energy of first excited state from a equilibrium state-specific calculation (using "ExternalIteration" in solution (using optimized geometry from job 4):SC-PCM: The total energy including the PCM contribution is -153.707151097 a.u. 7) Energy of ground state from a non-equilibrium calculation in solution (using first excited state optimized geometry from job 4 and its reaction field from job 6): SCF Done: E(RB3LYP) = -153.822029934 A.U. after 10 cycles The difference between these last two energies gives the vertical emission energy, which, in this case, is 396.62 nm. Please, let me know if you have any further questions, |
16楼2011-01-26 22:24:34
17楼2011-01-26 22:28:24
18楼2011-01-26 22:33:55
19楼2011-01-27 14:17:07
20楼2011-03-24 17:58:20
21楼2011-03-24 19:14:36
22楼2011-03-24 19:30:21
23楼2011-03-24 19:31:07
24楼2011-03-25 11:21:29
25楼2011-03-25 11:57:40
26楼2011-04-26 09:55:16
简单回复
zyxme6楼
2011-01-25 11:45
tandz(金币+1):谢谢参与

半熟的小苹果9楼
2011-01-25 15:19
tandz(金币+1):谢谢参与

半熟的小苹果10楼
2011-01-25 15:19
tandz(金币+1):谢谢参与

zyxme13楼
2011-01-25 16:13
tandz(金币+1):谢谢参与

sduqianqia15楼
2011-01-26 15:22
tandz(金币+1):谢谢参与












回复此楼

in solution (using ground state optimized geometry from job 1):