| ²é¿´: 4986 | »Ø¸´: 25 | |||||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||||
[½»Á÷]
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿G09Ó«¹â¹âÆ×Àý×Ó ÔËÐгö´í
|
|||||
|
ÓÃgaussian09¼ÆËãÒÒÈ©·Ö×ÓÔÚÒÒ´¼ÈÜÒºÖеÄÓ«¹â¹âÆ×¡£¸ù¾ÝÊֲᣬһ¹²·Ö³É7¸ö²½Ö裬http://www.gaussian.com/g_tech/g_ur/k_scrf.htm µ«ÊǼÆËãµ½µÚÁù²½³öÁËÎÊÌâ¡£ ÊäÈëÎļþÈçÏ£º %chk=06-ac # B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) TD=(Read,NStates=6,Root=1) SCRF=(Solvent=Ethanol,StateSpecific,Read) Geom=Check Guess=Read Acetaldehyde emission state-specific solvation at first excited state optimized geometry 0 1 NonEq=write ³ö´íÐÅÏ¢£º PCMU: Requested matrix not present on file. Error termination via Lnk1e in /public/g09/l601.exe Çë½Ì´ó¼Ò£¬ÈçºÎ½â¾öÕâ¸öÎÊÌâÄØ£¿ лл£¡ |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
¸ß˹¼°Ïà¹ØÈí¼þµÄʹÓà | GaussianÄ£Äâ¹âÆ× |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
070300×Ü·Ö298Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
2026ºþ±±Ê¦·¶´óѧ»¯Ñ§»¯¹¤Ñ§ÔºÕÐÊÕÑо¿Éúµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÎïÀí»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ207È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÏÃÃÅ´óѧ»¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶307Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
26Äê²ÄÁÏ/»¯Ñ§Ïà¹Ø×¨Òµ²©Ê¿Ñо¿ÉúÕÐÉú ÎÂÖÝ´óѧ»¯Ñ§Óë²ÄÁϹ¤³ÌѧԺ(26ÄêÇï¼¾Èëѧ)
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
0703µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
2026Ä격ʿÑо¿ÉúÕÐÉú
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÀíÂÛÓë¼ÆË㻯ѧ·½Ïòµ÷¼Á¡ª¡ª³õÊÔ388·Ö£¨Êýѧ144£©
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹ØÉ̼ÒÍÆ¼ö: (ÎÒÒ²ÒªÔÚÕâÀïÍÆ¹ã)
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
Ô×ÓÓ«¹â¹âÆ×²âÖØ½ðÊô
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÆÕͨ·Ö¹â¹â¶È¼Æ¡¢Ó«¹â·Ö¹â¹â¶È¼ÆºÍÓ«¹â¹âÆ×ÒǵÄÇø±ð
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
gaussian ¼ÆËãµÃµ½µÄÓ«¹â¹âÆ×Ñ¡ÔñÆä×î´ó·¢Éä¹âÆ×ÊÇ¿´f×î´ó¶ÔÓ¦µÄÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
G09¼ÆËãÀÂü¹âÆ×³ö´í
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿°´ÕÕG09˵Ã÷Ê鼯ËãÓ«¹â³ö´í¡£³öÔÚµÚ¶þ²½ÉÏ¡£
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Ó«¹â¹âÆ×µÄÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿G09½øÐÐÓ«¹â¹âÆ×¼ÆËãµÄÀý×Ó ³ö´í
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿g03ÈçºÎ¼ÆËãÎüÊÕ¹âÆ×ºÍÓ«¹â¹âÆ×µÄÌØÕ÷·å£¬ÃüÁîÈçºÎ±àд
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿¼ÆËãÓ«¹â¹âÆ×µÄÒÉ»ó£¬Çó½Ì£¡
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿¹ØÓÚÓ«¹â¹âÆ×Éϵı¶Æµ·å
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
Ó«¹â¹âÆ×£¬Á×¹â¹âÆ×£¬¹âÖ·¢¹â¹âÆ×ÈýÕßµÄÒìͬ¡£ÓÐЧÆÚÖÁ2010Äê6ÔÂ20ÈÕ
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Ó«¹â¹âÆ×·åÊÇʲôÑùµÄ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
» ÇÀ½ð±ÒÀ²£¡»ØÌû¾Í¿ÉÒԵõ½:
ÖйúÉ¢ÁÑÖÐ×ÓÔ´³ÏƸ¡°AI²ÄÁϼÆË㡱·½Ïò²©Ê¿ºó/Ö°¹¤
+1/391
ÄÏ·½¿Æ¼¼´óѧÄÉÃ×-·ÉÃë-³¬¿ì¶¯Á¦Ñ§¿ÎÌâ×é---³ÏƸ²©Ê¿ºó/ÖúÀíÑо¿Ô±
+1/189
ÄÏ·½¿Æ¼¼´óѧÄÉÃ×-·ÉÃë-³¬¿ì¶¯Á¦Ñ§¿ÎÌâ×é---³ÏƸ²©Ê¿ºó/ÖúÀíÑо¿Ô±
+1/187
ÖйúË®²ú¿ÆÑ§Ñо¿Ôº»Æº£Ë®²úÑо¿ËùÕÅÐñÖ¾¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÆ¸ ÈáÐÔ´«¸ÐÆ÷Ñо¿ ¿ÆÑÐÖúÀí
+2/136
ÄÏ·½¿Æ¼¼´óѧÍõÅôÍÅ¶Ó³ÏÆ¸Ò©Îﻯѧ¡¢»¯Ñ§Ì½Õë¡¢Ò©ÎïµÝËͲ©Ê¿ºó
+1/79
¿¼Ñе÷¼Á!
+1/42
ÖйúʯÓÍ´óѧ£¨»ª¶«£©»¯Ñ§»¯¹¤Ñ§ÔºÑ§Ë¶¡¢×¨Ë¶½ÓÊÕȱ¶îµ÷¼Á
+1/42
Çò²îÏà¹ØÖªÊ¶
+1/37
±±¾©Àí¹¤´óѧ-»¯Ñ§Ó뻯¹¤Ñ§Ôº-ÕÐÊÕ2026¼¶²©Ê¿Éú [ÉêÇë-¿¼ºËÖÆ]
+1/25
¡¾ÇáËÉ×¼Èë¡¿¡¾ÉúÎïÒ½Ò©¡¿2026Çൺ´óѧÕв©Ê¿Éú
+1/24
¡¾¹þ¹¤³Ì¡¿ºËѧԺij¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕÈ«ÈÕÖÆµ÷¼ÁÑо¿Éú
+1/20
¹þ¹¤´ó»¯¹¤Ñ§ÔºÀîÃɸտÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ2026ÄêÇï¼¾Èëѧ²©Ê¿Éú
+1/14
˫һÁ÷´óÑ§ÏæÌ¶´óѧ¡°»¯¹¤¹ý³ÌÄ£ÄâÓëÇ¿»¯¡±¹ú¼ÒµØ·½ÁªºÏ¹¤³ÌÑо¿ÖÐÐÄÕÐÊÕ²©Ê¿Éú
+1/13
¡¾2026µ÷¼Á¡¿ÄÏ·½¿Æ¼¼´óѧ-ÉîÛÚÀí¹¤´óѧ-ÖпÆÔº ÁªÅà086000ÃâÒß·½Ïò(26.9Èëѧ)
+1/11
³ÏÖ¿ÕÐÉú£¨Ë¶Ê¿+²©Ê¿£©
+1/9
½Î÷Ë®ÀûµçÁ¦´óѧ½ÓÊÕµ÷¼Á08¹¤Ñ§½Ô¿É
+1/8
ÖйúµØÕð¾ÖµØÖÊÑо¿Ëù+µØÇòÎïÀíרҵ+½ÓÊÕµ÷¼Á
+1/7
¡¾²©Ê¿ÕÐÉú¡¿ÄϾ©ÁÖÒµ´óѧ³µÁ¾¹¤³Ì¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ26Äê9ÔÂÈëѧ¡°ÉêÇë-¿¼ºËÖÆ¡±²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú
+1/7
²©Ê¿ÕÐÉú | Çൺ¿Æ¼¼´óѧ£¨¸ß·Ö×Ó¡¢»¯Ñ§¡¢²ÄÁÏ¡¢Á¦Ñ§¡¢º½Ìì¡¢»úµç¹¤³Ì¡¢¼ÆËã»ú·ÂÕæ£©
+1/5
2026Äê±±¾©Ê¯ÓÍ»¯¹¤Ñ§Ôº»·¾³Ñ§¿Æ-Ë®ÎÛȾ¿ØÖƹ¤³Ì·½Ïò¿ÎÌâ×é»¶ÓÄú
+1/3
pwzhou
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- QCÇ¿Ìû: 2
- Ó¦Öú: 51 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 7551.4
- Ìû×Ó: 412
- ÔÚÏß: 316.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 56225
¡ï
tandz(½ð±Ò+1):лл²ÎÓë
tandz(½ð±Ò+1):лл²ÎÓë
|
ÏÂÃæÊÇGaussian¹«Ë¾¹ØÓÚ7²½¼ÆËãÖеÄÄÜÁ¿µÄÒ»¸ö¼ÆËãµÄ˵Ã÷£¬°üº¬ÁËÄãµÄÎÊÌâµÄ´ð°¸£¬¹©²Î¿¼£º Dear Dr. Zhou, As I was saying in my previous email, the "StateSpecific" option in G09 rev. A.02 is connected incorrectly and it is not producing the results that it is supposed to produce, so please do not use the "StateSpecific" option in G09 rev. A.02. For the absorption/emission example in solution, you need to use the "ExternalIteration" option instead, which does produce the correct results. If you follow the whole example given in the manual but correcting the inputs to have "ExternalIteration" instead of "StateSpecific", you should obtain the following results on each one of the 7 proposed jobs in the example: 1) Energy of ground state optimized geometry in solution: SCF Done: E(RB3LYP) = -153.851761719 A.U. after 1 cycles 2) Vertical excitation (absorption) to first excited state from Linear Response calculation in solution (using ground state optimized geometry from job 1): Excited State 1: Singlet-A" 4.3767 eV 283.28 nm f=0.0000 ... Total Energy, E(TD-HF/TD-KS) = -153.690919717 3) Vertical excitation (absorption) to first excited state from a non-equilibrium state-specific calculation (using "ExternalIteration" in solution (using ground state optimized geometry from job 1):SC-PCM: The total energy including the PCM contribution is -153.687679830 a.u. Taking the difference of this energy minus the ground state energy (job 1), the excitation energy is 277.69 nm. 4) Geometry optimization of first excited state in solution (Final energy): Excited State 1: Singlet-A 3.2076 eV 386.53 nm f=0.0014 ... Total Energy, E(TD-HF/TD-KS) = -153.705918841 5) Frequency calculation to confirm that the geometry optimized in job 4 is a stationary point, and a minimum in the potential energy surface of the excited state. 6) Energy of first excited state from a equilibrium state-specific calculation (using "ExternalIteration" in solution (using optimized geometry from job 4):SC-PCM: The total energy including the PCM contribution is -153.707151097 a.u. 7) Energy of ground state from a non-equilibrium calculation in solution (using first excited state optimized geometry from job 4 and its reaction field from job 6): SCF Done: E(RB3LYP) = -153.822029934 A.U. after 10 cycles The difference between these last two energies gives the vertical emission energy, which, in this case, is 396.62 nm. Please, let me know if you have any further questions, |
16Â¥2011-01-26 22:24:34
¡ï
tandz(½ð±Ò+1):лл²ÎÓë
tandz(½ð±Ò+1):лл²ÎÓë
|
È¥µôStateSpecificÕâ¸ö¹Ø¼ü×Ö,ºÃÏñÄÜͨ¹ý,²»ÖªÔÒò.¿ÉÒԲο¼Ç°ÃæµÄ¼¸²½. Õâ¸öÀý×ÓºÃÏñÓÐÎÊÌâ [ Last edited by tephoon78 on 2011-1-26 at 14:46 ] |
2Â¥2011-01-24 14:30:26
3Â¥2011-01-24 16:18:28
¡ï
tandz(½ð±Ò+1):лл²ÎÓë
tandz(½ð±Ò+1):лл²ÎÓë
| ÎÒҲûÔõôÓÃg09ËãÓ«¹â,ÎÒËã¹ýµÄ¼¸¸ö,ÓеĺܺÃ,Óеĺܲî,һֱûÄܽâ¾ö,²»ÖªÊ²Ã´ÔÒò,ÏÖÔÚ·ÅÆúÁË.Äã×Ô¼º¿ÉÒÔ³¢ÊÔÒ»ÏÂ! |
4Â¥2011-01-25 09:24:00
¼òµ¥»Ø¸´
°ëÊìµÄСƻ¹û9Â¥
2011-01-25 15:19
tandz(½ð±Ò+1):лл²ÎÓë















»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

in solution (using ground state optimized geometry from job 1):