| ²é¿´: 1847 | »Ø¸´: 8 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
hejin04cÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
Сľ³æÀÖÀÖ³æ
|
[½»Á÷]
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Éó¸åÒâ¼û´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´£¬¼±Ñ½£¡ ÒÑÓÐ6È˲ÎÓë
|
||
| Section 3.4 is missing some good points: I'm a bit surprised to see thin-layer behaviour (Ip proportional to scan rate) at such high scan rates. The authors just reported Ip vs scan rate from 100 mV s-1 to 1V s-1. I would like to see some CVs at very low scan rate, I would say from 5 mV-1 to 100 mV s-1 to see the dependence of the Ip with the scan rate. By eye, based on the data reported in figure 4, the peak separation seems to me higher than 59mV, so the authors should explain this. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÄÏ´ó»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ÁòËáÄÆÈÜҺŨ¶ÈÓëÃܶÈÇúÏß
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
·ÖÎö»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ148È˻ظ´
0703µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
1
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
0703 µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÕÐÊÕ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Î÷ÄÏij211ÕÐ27½ì²©Ê¿
ÒѾÓÐ30È˻ظ´
´óÁ¬¹¤Òµ½ÜÇà/³¤½ÍŶÓ-ÉúÎïÖʲÄÁÏ-´¢ÄÜµç³Ø·½ÏòÕÐÊÕ2026¼¶²©Ê¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼ÁÒ»Ö¾Ô¸º£´ó£¬0703»¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶304·Ö£¬Óдó´´ÏîÄ¿£¬Ëļ¶Òѹý
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
¼±£¬Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´Õâ¸öÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬À§»ó.......
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼û»ØÀ´ÁË£¬´ó¼Ò°ïæ·ÖÎöһϣ¬ÓÐЩÒâ¼û¿´²»¶®£¿
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åÓдð¸´ÁË£¬Ð©Ðí¼¤¶¯Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´£¬Ð»Ð»´ó¼Ò£¡£¨ÔÚ13Â¥Ôö¼ÓµÚ¶þ·âÉó¸åÒâ¼û£©
ÒѾÓÐ32È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û£¬Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¡£×ż±¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÓÐÒ»ÌõÉó¸åÈËÒâ¼û¿´²»´ó¶®£¬Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ·ÖÎöÏ£¡¼±£¡
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Çë´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´Applied Catalysis B µÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û°É£¬Ð»Ð»À²
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼û»ØÀ´ÁË£¬´ó¼Ò°ï濴һϡ£¡£
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÎÄÕµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´£¡
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´ÕâÑùµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û»¹ÓбØÒª¸ÄÂ𣬻¹ÊǸÄͶ±ðµÄÆÚ¿¯Ñ½£¡
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
ÕâÑùµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬ÈÃÎÒºÎÈ¥ºÎ´ÓÄØ£¬Çë³æÓÑÃǰïæ£¬¼±Ñ½
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼û£¬´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼û»ØÀ´£¬Ò»¸öÉó¸åÈËÈþݣ¬±à¼Ëµ´óÐÞ£¬´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´Ï£Íû´ó²»
ÒѾÓÐ24È˻ظ´
°ïæ¿´¿´ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼û£¬¼±£¡£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´

sxpccw
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2622.4
- É¢½ð: 49
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 1578
- ÔÚÏß: 325.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 295128
- ×¢²á: 2006-11-11
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÓлúºÏ³É
|
Æäʵ¾ÍÊÇ¿´¿´ÄãµÄÌåϵµÄ¿ÉÄæÐÔÈçºÎ£¬È»ºó²ÅÄÜÅжÏIpºÍscan rateµÄ¹ØÏµ£¬¶ÔÓÚ¿ÉÄæ£¬°ë¿ÉÄæ£¬²»¿ÉÄæÌåϵ£¬Õâ¸ö¹ØÏµÊDz»Í¬µÄ Òò´ËËûÒª¿´ÄãÔÚ¸üСµÄµçÁ÷ϵĽá¹û£¬²ÉÓôóµÄɨÃèËÙ¶È£¬½á¹ûÊDz»¿É¿¿µÄ¡£ ÒòΪɨÃèËٶȹý´ó£¬ÍùÍùÔì³É·å¿í»¯£¬·´¶øµ¼ÖÂIpÖµ¼õС£¬ËùÒԾͲ»Ì«·ûºÏ¹æÂÉ¡£ ÄãÒª¸ø³öµÄ½á¹û£¬Ó¦¸Ã°´ÕÕÉó¸åÈ˵Ľ¨Ò鲹ʵÑé¡£ |
7Â¥2010-08-06 08:04:18
hejin04c
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
Сľ³æÀÖÀÖ³æ
- ECEPI: 12
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.551
- ½ð±Ò: 5312.1
- É¢½ð: 266
- ºì»¨: 9
- ɳ·¢: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 1441
- ÔÚÏß: 193.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 694727
- ×¢²á: 2009-01-22
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§·ÖÎö
- ¹ÜϽ: µç»¯Ñ§

2Â¥2010-08-04 21:27:45
liulimin_ly
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 856.5
- É¢½ð: 58
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 433
- ÔÚÏß: 94.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 952163
- ×¢²á: 2010-02-04
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
hejin04c(½ð±Ò+1):ллÁË 2010-08-06 07:21:12
|
Section 3.4 is missing some good points: I'm a bit surprised to see thin-layer behaviour (Ip proportional to scan rate) at such high scan rates. The authors just reported Ip vs scan rate from 100 mV s-1 to 1V s-1. I would like to see some CVs at very low scan rate, I would say from 5 mV-1 to 100 mV s-1 to see the dependence of the Ip with the scan rate. By eye, based on the data reported in figure 4, the peak separation seems to me higher than 59mV, so the authors should explain this ±¾ÎÄÀ´×Ô: Сľ³æÂÛ̳ http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2275929&fpage=2 ºÃÏñÊÇËûÈÃÄãÔÚµÍɨÃèËÙ¶ÈÔÙ°ÑʵÑéÖØÐÂ×öһϣ¬ËûÏë¿´¿´ÔÚ5 mV-1 to 100 mV s-1 µÄÇé¿ö£¬ÁíÍâËû˵ͼËÄ·å¾à³¬¹ý59mv£¬Ï£ÍûÄã½âÊÍһϣ¬²»ÊÇÄãµÄÁìÓò£¬²»ÖªËµµÄ¶Ô²» |
3Â¥2010-08-05 17:07:26
crazytrees
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1309.6
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 243
- ÔÚÏß: 70.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 76122
- ×¢²á: 2005-06-22
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
hejin04c(½ð±Ò+1):лл°ïÖú 2010-08-06 07:21:29
|
Æäʵ¾ÍÊÇ¿´¿´ÄãµÄÌåϵµÄ¿ÉÄæÐÔÈçºÎ£¬È»ºó²ÅÄÜÅжÏIpºÍscan rateµÄ¹ØÏµ£¬¶ÔÓÚ¿ÉÄæ£¬°ë¿ÉÄæ£¬²»¿ÉÄæÌåϵ£¬Õâ¸ö¹ØÏµÊDz»Í¬µÄ Òò´ËËûÒª¿´ÄãÔÚ¸üСµÄµçÁ÷ϵĽá¹û£¬²ÉÓôóµÄɨÃèËÙ¶È£¬½á¹ûÊDz»¿É¿¿µÄ¡£ ÒòΪɨÃèËٶȹý´ó£¬ÍùÍùÔì³É·å¿í»¯£¬·´¶øµ¼ÖÂIpÖµ¼õС£¬ËùÒԾͲ»Ì«·ûºÏ¹æÂÉ¡£ ÄãÒª¸ø³öµÄ½á¹û£¬Ó¦¸Ã°´ÕÕÉó¸åÈ˵Ľ¨Ò鲹ʵÑé¡£ Ö»ÊǸöÈ˸ù¾ÝÎÄÒâµÄ²Â²â£¬¾ßÌåÇé¿ö¾ßÌå·ÖÎö£¬²»ÖªµÀÄãÒªÌÖÂÛµÄÊÇʲôÌåϵ¡£ |
4Â¥2010-08-05 21:38:34













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥