| 查看: 911 | 回复: 6 | |||
peng0701木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
急啊,编辑的话看不太懂,各位进来分析下啊! 已有6人参与
|
|
我最近投了一篇文章,编辑回复如下: We can see that most modifications have been carried out on this manuscript. However, Figures 3-5 are still not in agreement with the scientific standards we would like to maintain in this journal. Some of the figures contain experimental points and lines. In the high-qulity chemical literature, this usually implies that the lines reflect fits to some sort of theoretical equation. However, this is clearly not the case here, the lines merely connect measured points. If this is true, do not use both lines and markers simultaneously, markers only are preferred in these cases. 主要是实验点和线,线是连接试验点的啊,这没错啊 |
» 猜你喜欢
静等基金结果
已经有18人回复
澳大利亚 Murdoch University 全奖博士招生(3个名额)地质化工冶金领域
已经有14人回复
阿姨
已经有3人回复
有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验)
已经有6人回复
filecode
已经有16人回复
重要来源:本周末出结果
已经有10人回复
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有11人回复
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有6人回复
不应该看fileCode
已经有9人回复
Filecode 又变了,巨变
已经有4人回复
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310.5
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
2楼2010-08-02 22:53:51
|
3楼2010-08-03 00:41:41

4楼2010-08-03 01:18:20
|
5楼2010-08-03 09:30:57
6楼2010-08-03 10:20:40
7楼2010-08-03 10:40:53










回复此楼