| 查看: 894 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
peng0701木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
急啊,编辑的话看不太懂,各位进来分析下啊! 已有6人参与
|
||
|
我最近投了一篇文章,编辑回复如下: We can see that most modifications have been carried out on this manuscript. However, Figures 3-5 are still not in agreement with the scientific standards we would like to maintain in this journal. Some of the figures contain experimental points and lines. In the high-qulity chemical literature, this usually implies that the lines reflect fits to some sort of theoretical equation. However, this is clearly not the case here, the lines merely connect measured points. If this is true, do not use both lines and markers simultaneously, markers only are preferred in these cases. 主要是实验点和线,线是连接试验点的啊,这没错啊 |
» 猜你喜欢
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有4人回复
这样的filecode谁见过
已经有16人回复
关于代码变化问题,想知道的进来
已经有16人回复
fileCode有新解读?
已经有18人回复
关于filecode,很负责任的告诉大家
已经有7人回复
【2027博士申请】纳米药物递送方向
已经有5人回复
关于豆爷回答的JTJC与%2F数量
已经有7人回复
2026国自然放榜时间
已经有3人回复
国基金的申报应该改成非等额制,评价高的钱多评价低的钱少,但是增加资助率
已经有7人回复
好奇怪的filecode
已经有4人回复
7楼2010-08-03 10:40:53
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310.5
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
2楼2010-08-02 22:53:51

4楼2010-08-03 01:18:20
|
5楼2010-08-03 09:30:57










回复此楼
20