| 查看: 918 | 回复: 6 | |||
peng0701木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
急啊,编辑的话看不太懂,各位进来分析下啊! 已有6人参与
|
|
我最近投了一篇文章,编辑回复如下: We can see that most modifications have been carried out on this manuscript. However, Figures 3-5 are still not in agreement with the scientific standards we would like to maintain in this journal. Some of the figures contain experimental points and lines. In the high-qulity chemical literature, this usually implies that the lines reflect fits to some sort of theoretical equation. However, this is clearly not the case here, the lines merely connect measured points. If this is true, do not use both lines and markers simultaneously, markers only are preferred in these cases. 主要是实验点和线,线是连接试验点的啊,这没错啊 |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧?
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的?
已经有18人回复
国自然评审意见
已经有15人回复
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有13人回复
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有14人回复
系统查不到
已经有11人回复
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310.5
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
2楼2010-08-02 22:53:51
|
3楼2010-08-03 00:41:41

4楼2010-08-03 01:18:20
|
5楼2010-08-03 09:30:57
6楼2010-08-03 10:20:40
7楼2010-08-03 10:40:53









回复此楼
30