| 查看: 860 | 回复: 6 | |||
peng0701木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
急啊，编辑的话看不太懂，各位进来分析下啊！ 已有6人参与
|
|
我最近投了一篇文章，编辑回复如下： We can see that most modifications have been carried out on this manuscript. However, Figures 3-5 are still not in agreement with the scientific standards we would like to maintain in this journal. Some of the figures contain experimental points and lines. In the high-qulity chemical literature, this usually implies that the lines reflect fits to some sort of theoretical equation. However, this is clearly not the case here, the lines merely connect measured points. If this is true, do not use both lines and markers simultaneously, markers only are preferred in these cases. 主要是实验点和线，线是连接试验点的啊，这没错啊 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
职称论文投稿
已经有12人回复
-
反应求助
已经有6人回复
-
基于自然哲学类比的风化壳型稀土矿
已经有16人回复
-
看《给阿ma的情书》有感
已经有10人回复
-
2026年WR青拔进展
已经有7人回复
-
中！中！中！
已经有10人回复
-
会评什么时候开始？
已经有4人回复
-
国自然申请五篇代表作大比拼，感觉这个是最重要的
已经有12人回复
-
无聊看看时间戳打发时间
已经有4人回复
-
咨询
已经有3人回复
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310.5
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
2楼2010-08-02 22:53:51
 |
3楼2010-08-03 00:41:41
4楼2010-08-03 01:18:20
|
|
5楼2010-08-03 09:30:57
6楼2010-08-03 10:20:40
7楼2010-08-03 10:40:53