| 查看: 719 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
peng0701木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
急啊，编辑的话看不太懂，各位进来分析下啊！ 已有6人参与
|
||
|
我最近投了一篇文章，编辑回复如下： We can see that most modifications have been carried out on this manuscript. However, Figures 3-5 are still not in agreement with the scientific standards we would like to maintain in this journal. Some of the figures contain experimental points and lines. In the high-qulity chemical literature, this usually implies that the lines reflect fits to some sort of theoretical equation. However, this is clearly not the case here, the lines merely connect measured points. If this is true, do not use both lines and markers simultaneously, markers only are preferred in these cases. 主要是实验点和线，线是连接试验点的啊，这没错啊 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
2025年遐想
已经有4人回复
-
自荐读博
已经有9人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
-
自然科学基金委宣布启动申请书“瘦身提质”行动
已经有4人回复
-
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
6楼2010-08-03 10:20:40