| 查看: 905 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
peng0701木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
急啊,编辑的话看不太懂,各位进来分析下啊! 已有6人参与
|
||
|
我最近投了一篇文章,编辑回复如下: We can see that most modifications have been carried out on this manuscript. However, Figures 3-5 are still not in agreement with the scientific standards we would like to maintain in this journal. Some of the figures contain experimental points and lines. In the high-qulity chemical literature, this usually implies that the lines reflect fits to some sort of theoretical equation. However, this is clearly not the case here, the lines merely connect measured points. If this is true, do not use both lines and markers simultaneously, markers only are preferred in these cases. 主要是实验点和线,线是连接试验点的啊,这没错啊 |
» 猜你喜欢
关于Filecode分析方法
已经有5人回复
2019年青年基金涵评意见,大家看看几个A,几个B?
已经有8人回复
不应该看fileCode
已经有6人回复
好奇怪的filecode
已经有6人回复
FileCode能看出啥?
已经有21人回复
长年满屏的广告,版主太不责任了。基金也等的急
已经有4人回复
filecode
已经有15人回复
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有35人回复
职称评审,求友友推荐见刊最快的期刊
已经有4人回复
奇怪,两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有10人回复
6楼2010-08-03 10:20:40
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310.5
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
2楼2010-08-02 22:53:51

4楼2010-08-03 01:18:20
|
5楼2010-08-03 09:30:57










回复此楼