24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3215  |  回复: 15
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ansrang

木虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 请问这个审稿回复是什么意思? 已有14人参与

提了几个问题,最后一个问题是:English language is correct in use and grammar.
这到底是什么意思?是说要我再修改一下语言吗?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ansrang

木虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by ljhcumt at 2010-06-20 07:05:40:
能不能把审稿回复的全文贴一下,这个看不明白

审稿回复如下:
We have received reviewer's reports on your above manuscript. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript within 30 days. If you are submitting a revised manuscript

reviewer1#省略。。。
reviewer2#
1) The activities reported in table 1 are by mg. It is not clear if it is mg of CLEA or mg of protease. In the last case, there is no explicit explanation in the experimental part about how the weight of protease in the p-CLEAs or in the CLEas was obtained. No report of procedure to know about remaining protease in the supernatant of the preparation or in the washing steps. The initial amount was 5 mg of papain in 10 mls.
I recommend the authors to be very careful with the methods of detection of enzyme amount as protein quantification. Further material
Bradley J.S.C. Olson and John Markwell
Current Protocols in Protein Science (2007) Supplement 48 ; 3.4.1 to 3.4.29 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

2) It is known today that several protein detection methods have several problems in its application to protease/other enzymes concentration-especially if stirring is involved and buffer is present.It is included the parameter Ew as enzyme amount in page 4,but it is not clear how this amount was obtained- if it is protease. IF the reported weight is of CLEA and no mass balance was done to know about how much protease is present in the CLEA, this should be clearly stablished. One way to do it is to measure activity in supernatants and washings,assuming similar activity of the free enzyme and of the remaining not-precipitated and not cross-linked enzyme.

3) Taking into account the above, the authors presented in Table 1 several results associated to their CLEAs. Without the knowledge on the total amount of protease, they do not know per mg of it the actual activity. However, the comparison is pertinent between CLEAs.Without knowledge on the protease amount present in both CLEAs what is not pertinent is the comparison with the free enzyme.

4) With these ideas in mind, how do they know if the lower activity in the case of the CLEA in table 1 is due to the presence of the starch and a "dilution" effect of the starch. Because it is not clear if the activity reports are presented by mg of enzyme or mg of CLEA, this is not known. BTW, if it is by mg of enzyme, how the protease amount in CLEAs was determined?

5) IF the porous structure is different, the authors could try to perform a BET Area determination for the CLEA and the p-CLEA to give further support to their assumptions. They also could perform the complete N2 isotherm to know about the pore distribution.

6)English language is correct in use and grammar.

最后一个问题就是我说的,让人摸不着头脑,请大家指点
9楼2010-06-20 09:47:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 16 个回答

ljhcumt

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

木虫精英


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
能不能把审稿回复的全文贴一下,这个看不明白
黑夜给了我黑色的眼睛,我却用它寻找光明。
2楼2010-06-20 07:05:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

statsky

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
是啊,这个看不出什么意思
3楼2010-06-20 07:07:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhiyongwang

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

应该是语法和英语的使用应该修正!
4楼2010-06-20 08:24:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点 +11 kulium 2026-08-21 14/700 2026-08-24 02:12 by 流流伤
[基金申请] 范进中举一文的中心思想 +4 炎黄贵胄 2026-08-22 5/250 2026-08-24 02:09 by 流流伤
[基金申请] 2026国自然函评费到账 +16 羊腰板 2026-08-21 17/850 2026-08-23 23:02 by tianxiaochun
[基金申请] 让我中一个面上吧! +12 大萍1987 2026-08-20 15/750 2026-08-23 20:44 by 大萍1987
[教师之家] 跳槽后在研项目怎么办? +5 简单化xn 2026-08-22 10/500 2026-08-23 12:38 by 简单化xn
[基金申请] 什么时候开奖? +9 CrisMessi 2026-08-18 10/500 2026-08-23 12:03 by 丶昵称占用
[基金申请] 今天放榜吗? +15 布布和一二 2026-08-19 16/800 2026-08-23 09:55 by 张春生
[基金申请] 93BebMhtakh前后11位开头都是大写 +7 且听虎啸 2026-08-17 8/400 2026-08-22 21:55 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] filecode,4个jtjc了 +13 ziyangfang 2026-08-19 16/800 2026-08-22 17:08 by WH3796
[基金申请] 时间戳今天,20号变了 +5 archvillain 2026-08-20 5/250 2026-08-22 06:12 by hui_daxiao
[基金申请] 放榜前的不淡定 40+4 snowwithsea 2026-08-19 14/700 2026-08-21 23:51 by cratir
[基金申请] 今日不放榜?网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果 +16 医学老男孩 2026-08-20 20/1000 2026-08-21 21:13 by Ldrop2023
[基金申请] 看来今天不会放榜了? +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了 +13 wuchongjun 2026-08-20 19/950 2026-08-21 17:21 by 紫杉醇
[基金申请] 感觉是下周放榜了 +7 angus9576 2026-08-17 12/600 2026-08-21 13:38 by weiyin
[基金申请] 应该是下周三26日公布了吧? +4 哈哈蛤? 2026-08-21 4/200 2026-08-21 10:58 by Vivilian
[论文投稿] 投稿咨询 +5 wwm09 2026-08-17 7/350 2026-08-21 10:11 by 期刊论文帮手
[基金申请] 时间戳变了,能看出什么问题? +18 基诺咪客 2026-08-17 23/1150 2026-08-20 17:19 by Godzela
[基金申请] 朋友圈看到的 +6 wangzilk 2026-08-18 8/400 2026-08-19 10:55 by Haru815
[基金申请] 明天放榜? +5 Shxjjxjkx 2026-08-18 5/250 2026-08-18 18:14 by -大大大大大-
信息提示
请填处理意见