应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 交流 » 请问这个审稿回复是什么意思？
161/2返回列表12下一页
查看: 2618  |  回复: 15
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

ansrang

木虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 请问这个审稿回复是什么意思？已有14人参与

提了几个问题，最后一个问题是：English language is correct in use and grammar.
这到底是什么意思？是说要我再修改一下语言吗？
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼2010-06-20 02:53:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ljhcumt

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

木虫精英
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
能不能把审稿回复的全文贴一下，这个看不明白
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
黑夜给了我黑色的眼睛,我却用它寻找光明。
2楼2010-06-20 07:05:40
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

statsky

木虫 (正式写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
是啊，这个看不出什么意思
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
3楼2010-06-20 07:07:43
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhiyongwang

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
应该是语法和英语的使用应该修正！
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2010-06-20 08:24:40
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gy012702

金虫 (小有名气)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
应该是语法和英语的使用应该修正！
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
5楼2010-06-20 08:37:15
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mlanqiang

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

蓝博士

呵呵

★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
需要全文，才能准确判断。因为从字面上看，是你的英文在使用和合语法上是没有问题的。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
蓝精灵
6楼2010-06-20 08:41:46
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yuan999

专家顾问 (知名作家)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
润色一下英语和语法
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
我~心~依~旧
7楼2010-06-20 08:50:50
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

2009210721

铜虫 (著名写手)
无法理解啊，帮顶
回复此楼
8楼2010-06-20 08:53:29
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ansrang

木虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
Originally posted by ljhcumt at 2010-06-20 07:05:40:
能不能把审稿回复的全文贴一下，这个看不明白

审稿回复如下：
We have received reviewer's reports on your above manuscript. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript within 30 days. If you are submitting a revised manuscript

reviewer1#省略。。。
reviewer2#
1) The activities reported in table 1 are by mg. It is not clear if it is mg of CLEA or mg of protease. In the last case, there is no explicit explanation in the experimental part about how the weight of protease in the p-CLEAs or in the CLEas was obtained. No report of procedure to know about remaining protease in the supernatant of the preparation or in the washing steps. The initial amount was 5 mg of papain in 10 mls.
I recommend the authors to be very careful with the methods of detection of enzyme amount as protein quantification. Further material
Bradley J.S.C. Olson and John Markwell
Current Protocols in Protein Science (2007) Supplement 48 ; 3.4.1 to 3.4.29 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

2) It is known today that several protein detection methods have several problems in its application to protease/other enzymes concentration-especially if stirring is involved and buffer is present.It is included the parameter Ew as enzyme amount in page 4,but it is not clear how this amount was obtained- if it is protease. IF the reported weight is of CLEA and no mass balance was done to know about how much protease is present in the CLEA, this should be clearly stablished. One way to do it is to measure activity in supernatants and washings,assuming similar activity of the free enzyme and of the remaining not-precipitated and not cross-linked enzyme.

3) Taking into account the above, the authors presented in Table 1 several results associated to their CLEAs. Without the knowledge on the total amount of protease, they do not know per mg of it the actual activity. However, the comparison is pertinent between CLEAs.Without knowledge on the protease amount present in both CLEAs what is not pertinent is the comparison with the free enzyme.

4) With these ideas in mind, how do they know if the lower activity in the case of the CLEA in table 1 is due to the presence of the starch and a "dilution" effect of the starch. Because it is not clear if the activity reports are presented by mg of enzyme or mg of CLEA, this is not known. BTW, if it is by mg of enzyme, how the protease amount in CLEAs was determined?

5) IF the porous structure is different, the authors could try to perform a BET Area determination for the CLEA and the p-CLEA to give further support to their assumptions. They also could perform the complete N2 isotherm to know about the pore distribution.

6)English language is correct in use and grammar.

最后一个问题就是我说的，让人摸不着头脑，请大家指点
赞一下 回复此楼
9楼2010-06-20 09:47:38
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lovewb

铜虫 (正式写手)
呵呵 应该是说你的英语表达正确

如果是不正确 那就是 incrooect
赞一下 回复此楼
10楼2010-06-20 12:11:56
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 ansrang 的主题更新
161/2返回列表12下一页
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭