24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4460  |  回复: 24
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

yf625oscar

木虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 审稿意见回来,一个审稿人让据,编辑说大修,大家帮我看看希望大不已有21人参与

Dear Mr ***
The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form.

However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' and editor's comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript within 3 months. Please note that this paper requires major revision.  Reviewer 1 has major criticisms and recommended rejection, although I believe the paper can be brought to an acceptable standard by careful revision.

我看了下第一个审稿人的修改意见,其中有一个地方很难改,当时我看到一个现象(其实这个现象对我实验结果不是太重要),我就对这个现象做了个简单的解释,但是我用了“往往”这个词,结果审稿人要求我找出文献支持我的这种解释,我现在找不到,咋办啊?
另外还有一个审稿人给了句审稿意见:There is no indication of replicate experiments and a consideration of experimental error in this work.
说我没考虑实验的重复性,这个要怎么回复啊?

[ Last edited by yf625oscar on 2010-6-3 at 23:10 ]
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

SCI等论文

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
编辑让大修的意思就是准备接收,不过需要楼主好好修改,加油!
咱也是有组织的人了...
11楼2010-06-03 21:33:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 yf625oscar 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见