| 查看: 719 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 ifoolishman 的 10 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
ifoolishman新虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
关于审稿意见的意思
|
||
|
这是审稿意见， <DELTA>Ep+ <DELTA>Ek + <DELTA>Edis = W, where <DELTA>Ep is the potential energy variation (gravitational and elastic), <DELTA>Ek is the kinetic energy variation, <DELTA>Edis the energy dissipation et W the work of external forces (mainly gravitational load here). In your study, you consider that the second state is in static equilibrium too, which means <DELTA>Ek = 0 and you calculate <DELTA>Ep (with the reasonable assumption of neglecting the potential gravitational energy). You then didn't consider the others terms : W and <DELTA>Edis. It is clearly a strong assumption to define the energy release equal to <DELTA>Ep. My opinion is that the energy release must be more carefully defined and discussed. Another possibility is to calculate <DELTA>Edis in which you will find that a part of it can correspond to a yielding dissipation (and cracks propagation). When this yielding energy is not enough to respect the first law of thermodynamics with the constraint that <DELTA>Ek = 0, this means that there is an excessive energy that will take the form of a seismic energy. This could also be called released energy. In your case, it is probable that you can't find any seismic energy because you consider a Mohr-Coulomb criterion with no softening. However, most of rock material display a softening behavior for small confining stresses (this is the case for the gap which displays a free surface) - this should be taken into account or discuss in the application. 这个审稿意见，是让我按照他的意见重新计算呢？还是不用重新计算，但是在文章里面做充分的讨论就行？ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
读博
已经有5人回复
-
博士申请都是内定的吗？
已经有6人回复
-
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利，现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈？
已经有5人回复
-
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有29人回复
-
投稿精细化工
已经有4人回复
-
高职单位投计算机相关的北核或SCI四区期刊推荐，求支招！
已经有4人回复
-
导师想让我从独立一作变成了共一第一
已经有9人回复
-
心脉受损
已经有5人回复
-
Springer期刊投稿求助
已经有4人回复
-
小论文投稿
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
审稿意见中关于physical argumentation的意思， 谢谢
已经有3人回复- 关于审稿人的意见
已经有27人回复
- 关于晶体荧光的审稿意见
已经有3人回复
- 关于审稿意见的回复，求助大家！！！
已经有2人回复
- 关于这条审稿意见的意思。
已经有1人回复
- 关于审稿意见的理解
已经有2人回复
- 关于审稿意见的求助
已经有1人回复
- 关于审稿人的意见？
已经有4人回复
- 关于审稿意见
已经有5人回复
- 关于晶体的审稿人意见什么意思，急求，谢了
已经有6人回复
- 帮忙看看这两条审稿意见什么意思啊
已经有5人回复
- 关于审稿意见
已经有1人回复
- 关于审稿人的意见
已经有5人回复
- 关于审稿意见的修改
已经有4人回复
- 关于审稿意见的两点疑惑
已经有22人回复
- 继续求助关于审稿意见
已经有1人回复
- 关于审稿意见的回复
已经有3人回复
ifoolishman
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 243.6
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 80
- 在线: 23.7小时
- 虫号: 3028410
- 注册: 2014-03-08
- 专业: 矿山岩体力学与岩层控制
2楼2017-01-01 08:01:54
ifoolishman
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 243.6
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 80
- 在线: 23.7小时
- 虫号: 3028410
- 注册: 2014-03-08
- 专业: 矿山岩体力学与岩层控制
3楼2017-01-01 18:37:01