| 查看: 737 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 ifoolishman 的 10 个金币 | |||
ifoolishman新虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
关于审稿意见的意思
|
||
|
这是审稿意见， <DELTA>Ep+ <DELTA>Ek + <DELTA>Edis = W, where <DELTA>Ep is the potential energy variation (gravitational and elastic), <DELTA>Ek is the kinetic energy variation, <DELTA>Edis the energy dissipation et W the work of external forces (mainly gravitational load here). In your study, you consider that the second state is in static equilibrium too, which means <DELTA>Ek = 0 and you calculate <DELTA>Ep (with the reasonable assumption of neglecting the potential gravitational energy). You then didn't consider the others terms : W and <DELTA>Edis. It is clearly a strong assumption to define the energy release equal to <DELTA>Ep. My opinion is that the energy release must be more carefully defined and discussed. Another possibility is to calculate <DELTA>Edis in which you will find that a part of it can correspond to a yielding dissipation (and cracks propagation). When this yielding energy is not enough to respect the first law of thermodynamics with the constraint that <DELTA>Ek = 0, this means that there is an excessive energy that will take the form of a seismic energy. This could also be called released energy. In your case, it is probable that you can't find any seismic energy because you consider a Mohr-Coulomb criterion with no softening. However, most of rock material display a softening behavior for small confining stresses (this is the case for the gap which displays a free surface) - this should be taken into account or discuss in the application. 这个审稿意见，是让我按照他的意见重新计算呢？还是不用重新计算，但是在文章里面做充分的讨论就行？ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
版面费该交吗
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
基金正文30页指的是报告正文还是整个申请书
已经有6人回复
-
面上可以超过30页吧？
已经有4人回复
-
过年走亲戚时感受到了所开私家车的鄙视链
已经有12人回复
-
为什么中国大学教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 审稿意见中关于physical argumentation的意思， 谢谢
已经有3人回复
- 关于审稿人的意见
已经有27人回复
- 关于晶体荧光的审稿意见
已经有3人回复
- 关于审稿意见的回复，求助大家！！！
已经有2人回复
- 关于这条审稿意见的意思。
已经有1人回复
- 关于审稿意见的理解
已经有2人回复
- 关于审稿意见的求助
已经有1人回复
- 关于审稿人的意见？
已经有4人回复
- 关于审稿意见
已经有5人回复
- 关于晶体的审稿人意见什么意思，急求，谢了
已经有6人回复
- 帮忙看看这两条审稿意见什么意思啊
已经有5人回复
- 关于审稿意见
已经有1人回复
- 关于审稿人的意见
已经有5人回复
- 关于审稿意见的修改
已经有4人回复
- 关于审稿意见的两点疑惑
已经有22人回复
- 继续求助关于审稿意见
已经有1人回复
- 关于审稿意见的回复
已经有3人回复
ifoolishman
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 243.6
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 80
- 在线: 23.7小时
- 虫号: 3028410
- 注册: 2014-03-08
- 专业: 矿山岩体力学与岩层控制
2楼2017-01-01 08:01:54
ifoolishman
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 243.6
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 80
- 在线: 23.7小时
- 虫号: 3028410
- 注册: 2014-03-08
- 专业: 矿山岩体力学与岩层控制
3楼2017-01-01 18:37:01
4楼2017-01-01 18:45:36
| 祝福 |
5楼2017-01-01 19:10:33