²é¿´: 1302  |  »Ø¸´: 6

ԬССȻ

Òø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

[ÇóÖú] Çó×éÎÄÏ×¾ä×Ó·­Òë

¿´ÎÄÏ×ÓÐÒ»¾ä»°²»Ì«¶®¡£
The lowest increase was noted for EDC/NHS method (2.8 times higher),which could be explained by the fact that covalent linkage methods tend to specific orientation of the enzyme.
Õâ¾ä»°Ôõô·­ÒëºÃÒ»Ð©ÄØ£¿
¹²¼Û½áºÏ·¨ÇãÏòÓÚÃ¸ÌØ¶¨µÄ·½Ïò£¿£¿¸Ð¾õ²»Ì«¶Ô°¡£¡£¡
ÎÞ
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

genhunter

ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû

¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
ԬССȻ: ½ð±Ò+3 2015-11-19 23:05:24
°®ÓëÓêÏÂ: ½ð±Ò+1 2015-11-20 07:09:39
The lowest increase was noted for EDC/NHS method (2.8 times higher),which could be explained by the fact that covalent linkage methods tend to specific orientation of the enzyme.

ÓÃEDC/NHS·½·¨ºÜµ½µÄÔö·ù×îÉÙ(Ôö¼Ó2.8±¶), Õâ¿ÉÒÔÓù²¼Û½»ÁªÇ÷ÓÚ½«Ã¸ÒÔÌØ¶¨µÄ×ßÏòÅŲ¼À´½âÊÍ¡£
Àë³É¹¦»¹²îÒ»µã
2Â¥2015-11-19 14:01:30
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

genhunter

ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

ÒýÓûØÌû:
2Â¥: Originally posted by genhunter at 2015-11-19 14:01:30
The lowest increase was noted for EDC/NHS method (2.8 times higher),which could be explained by the fact that covalent linkage methods tend to specific orientation of the enzyme.

ÓÃEDC/NHS·½·¨ºÜµ½ ...

ÕâÀïÔö¼ÓµÄÓ¦¸ÃÊÇøµÄKd
Àë³É¹¦»¹²îÒ»µã
3Â¥2015-11-19 14:34:23
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

lz3333

ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû

¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
ԬССȻ: ½ð±Ò+5 2015-11-19 23:05:37
°®ÓëÓêÏÂ: ½ð±Ò+1 2015-11-20 07:09:55
The lowest increase was noted for EDC/NHS method (2.8 times higher),which could be explained by the fact that covalent linkage methods tend to specific orientation of the enzyme.
Êǹ̶¨»¯Ã¸µÄÎÄÏ×ô£¿ÎÒ±ÏÒµÂÛÎÄ×öµÄ¹Ì¶¨»¯Ã¸¡£
·­ÒëÐèÒª¿´ÉÏÏÂÎĵÄÒâ˼£¬²Å¿ÉÒÔ¸üºÃµÄ·­Òë³öÀ´£¬²»¹ý¾Í×ÖÃæµÄÒâ˼Ӧ¸Ã·­ÒëΪ£º
EDC/NHS·¨Ôö¼ÓµÄ×îÉÙ£¬½ö2.8±¶£¬¹²¼ÛÁ¬½Ó·¨¿ÉÒÔ½«Ã¸¶¨Ïò£¨¹Ì¶¨»¯£©ÕâÒ»ÊÂʵ¿É½âÊÍÕâÒ»ÏÖÏó¡£

» ±¾ÌûÒÑ»ñµÃµÄºì»¨£¨×îÐÂ10¶ä£©

4Â¥2015-11-19 15:15:20
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

ԬССȻ

Òø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

ÒýÓûØÌû:
4Â¥: Originally posted by lz3333 at 2015-11-19 15:15:20
The lowest increase was noted for EDC/NHS method (2.8 times higher),which could be explained by the fact that covalent linkage methods tend to specific orientation of the enzyme.
Êǹ̶¨»¯Ã¸µÄÎÄÏ×ô£¿ ...

Each sample was a square piece of Whatman no 1 paper with a1 ¡Á 1 cm sample area defined with wax (XEROX Phaser printer) [10].Samples for each immobilization method were coded and mea-sured in random order. A 10 L of solution was needed to wet thepaper completely, if not stated otherwise this volume was used forall modifications. All solutions, if not stated differently were pre-pared in PBS pH 5.5. In case of layer-by-layer methods paper wascovered with 3 bilayers starting with anionic polymer. In the secondand third bilayer cationic polymer was mixed with Glucose oxidaseto obtain final concentration of 2.5 mg/mL (92.5 U/mL) of enzyme.In the case of subsequent methods: EDC, EDC/NHS, entrapment inammonium alginate and all encapsulation methods several batcheswith different concentration of reagents and reaction times wereprepared. Table 1 lists only the optimized conditions of aforemen-tioned methods. In case of encapsulation methods, smaller capsuleswere dispersed on sample papers with a pipette, larger capsuleswere transported manually on paper and left to dry.
ÎÞ
5Â¥2015-11-19 23:03:45
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

ԬССȻ

Òø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

Ëͺ컨һ¶ä
ÒýÓûØÌû:
4Â¥: Originally posted by lz3333 at 2015-11-19 15:15:20
The lowest increase was noted for EDC/NHS method (2.8 times higher),which could be explained by the fact that covalent linkage methods tend to specific orientation of the enzyme.
Êǹ̶¨»¯Ã¸µÄÎÄÏ×ô£¿ ...

»¹ÓÐÒ»´ó¶Î°ïÎÒ¿´¿´ÊÇʲôÒâ˼°É£¡£¡ÊµÔÚÊDz»ÖªµÀ˵µÄÊÇʲô£¡£¡
ÎÞ
6Â¥2015-11-19 23:05:07
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

lz3333

ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû

Each sample was a square piece of Whatman no 1 paper with a 1 ¡Á 1 cm sample area defined with wax (XEROX Phaser printer) [10].
ÿ¸öÑùÆ·¶¼ÊÇÔÚwhatman 1ºÅ·½ÐÎÖ½ÉÏÃæµÄÒ»¸ö1 ¡Á 1 cmµÄÑùÆ·ÇøÓò£¬Ê¹ÓÃÀ¯½øÐй̶¨¡£
Samples for each immobilization method were coded and measured in random order.
ÿÖ̶ֹ¨·½·¨µÄÑùÆ·¶¼ÊÇËæ»ú±àºÅºÍ²âÁ¿¡£
A 10 L of solution was needed to wet the paper completely, if not stated otherwise this volume was used for all modifications.
Èçδ±ê¼Ç£¬ËùÓÐÐÞÊη½·¨¾ùʹÓÃ10LÈÜÒºÀ´ÍêÈ«ÈóʪÑùƷֽƬ¡£
All solutions, if not stated differently were prepared in PBS pH 5.5.
ËùÓÐÈÜÒº£¬ÈçÎ´ÌØÊâ±ê¼Ç£¬¾ùÔÚPBS£¬pH5.5Ìõ¼þÏÂÖÆ±¸¡£
In case of layer-by-layer methods paper was covered with 3 bilayers starting with anionic polymer.
²ãµþ·¨ÖÐֽƬÐèÓÃ3²ãĤ¸²¸Ç£¬µÚÒ»²ãÊÇÒõÀë×Ó¾ÛºÏÎ
In the second and third bilayer cationic polymer was mixed with Glucose oxidase to obtain final concentration of 2.5 mg/mL (92.5 U/mL) of enzyme.
µÚ¶þ²ãºÍµÚÈý²ãµÄÑôÀë×Ó¾ÛºÏÎïÐèÒªÓëÆÏÌÇÑõ»¯Ã¸»ìºÏ£¬ÒÔ´ïµ½×îÖÕøŨ¶ÈΪ2.5 mg/mL (92.5 U/mL)
Äãð¤Ìù¹ýÀ´µÄÎÄÏ×£¬¶Ï¾äÓÐÎÊÌ⣬Äã¿´¿´Ô­Îİɣ¬ÏÂÃæÊÇÎÒ×Ô¼º¸ù¾ÝÒâ˼·­ÒëµÄ¡£
In the case of subsequent methods: EDC, EDC/NHS, entrapment in ammonium alginate and all encapsulation methods£¬several batches with different concentration of reagents and reaction times were prepared.
½ÓÏÂÀ´µÄ·½·¨£¬EDC¡¢ EDC/NHS·¨ÖУ¬Ê¹Óú£ÔåËáï§½øÐнØÁô£»ËùÓзâ°ü·¨ÖÐʹÓò»Í¬µÄÊÔ¼ÁŨ¶ÈºÍ·´Ó¦Ê±¼ä·Ö±ð½øÐÐÁËÖÆ±¸¡£
Table 1 lists only the optimized conditions of a fore-mentioned methods. In case of encapsulation methods, smaller capsules were dispersed on sample papers with a pipette, larger capsules were transported manually on paper and left to dry.
±í1½öÁоÙÁËÇ°ÃæÌáµ½·½·¨µÄ×î¼ÑÌõ¼þ¡£ÔÚ·â°ü·¨ÖУ¬Ð¡ÄÒʹÓÃÒÆÒº¹Ü·ÖÉ¢ÔÚÑùÆ·Ö½ÉÏ£¬´óÄÒÊÖ¶¯×ªÒƵ½Ö½Éϲ¢ÁÀ¸É¡£
7Â¥2015-11-20 09:51:03
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ ԬССȻ µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ¹úÉç¿ÆÍ¨Ñ¶ÆÀÉó +3 DZˮ¹Ú¾ü123 2026-07-18 4/200 2026-07-18 16:29 by ×î°®±à×ë´Çµä
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ÃæÉϵÄË®ºÜÉî +8 ²¼²¼ºÍÒ»¶þ 2026-07-18 13/650 2026-07-18 16:13 by ²¼²¼ºÍÒ»¶þ
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ÉúÃü¿ÚC13ÃæÉÏ»áÆÀʱ¼ä +7 luckinging 2026-07-14 11/550 2026-07-17 20:43 by ³æ²·1988
[½Ìʦ֮¼Ò] ÄÚÐÄØÑ·¦ +16 Ë®±ùÔÂÔÂÒ°Íà 2026-07-12 16/800 2026-07-17 19:25 by otani
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ÉúÃü¿ÚÃæÉÏ»áÆÀ½áÊøÁËÂð´ó¼ÒÓÐÖªµÀ½á¹ûÂð£¿ÏÖÔÚ»¹Ã»Óнá¹ûÕý³£²»£¿ +6 ±ÌË®00 2026-07-16 9/450 2026-07-17 15:21 by jaasxulu
[ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å] ͶӢÎÄÆÚ¿¯ÈçºÎ²éÖØ 10+5 ²»ÖªµÀȡʲôÃû× 2026-07-15 6/300 2026-07-17 09:07 by bobvan
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ²»ÒªÔÙÊý¹ú×ÔÈ»ÉêÇëÊéµÄ filecode µÄ·Ö¸ô·û¸öÊýÁË +14 sadpencil 2026-07-12 21/1050 2026-07-17 00:15 by wangze12014
[Óлú½»Á÷] ²®°·Éϼ׻ùÇóÖú 100+4 002tmumu 2026-07-14 7/350 2026-07-16 19:47 by 002tmumu
[ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å] ¿ç³ö°æÉçÉÌͶ¸å 20+5 ÄߺÃ520 2026-07-13 5/250 2026-07-16 17:24 by ÎÞÊÓ¾üÍÅ
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] 5¸ö%2F£¬·Ç¹Ì¶¨¶Î22¸ö×Öĸ +6 jaasxulu 2026-07-15 7/350 2026-07-16 13:02 by monkeynana
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ÉúÉúÃüѧ²¿»áÆÀ +4 wuke100666 2026-07-15 4/200 2026-07-16 00:12 by À²À²Ð¡ÄÝ×Ó
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] H¿Ú£¬ÃæÉÏ£¬Ê±¼ä´Á7ÔÂ7ÈÕ¡£ +3 plumage5 2026-07-15 3/150 2026-07-15 21:06 by 6543yes
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] Сľ³æÃ»ÂäÁË£¬³ýÁËÆíµ»Ìû×Ó£¬¼¸ºõ¿´²»µ½ÓмÛÖµµÄÌû×Ó +13 botar 2026-07-14 14/700 2026-07-15 19:28 by º®Á÷32
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] »áÆÀ +5 ÎÞÃûÕßµÇɽ 2026-07-15 5/250 2026-07-15 18:15 by ¸Ü¾ÍÊÇÄã¶Ô
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] E¿Ú»áÆÀ +11 ²¼²¼ºÍÒ»¶þ 2026-07-13 13/650 2026-07-15 16:34 by Kittylucky
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] E¿ÚÇàC»áÆÀ½áÊøÁËÂ𣿠40+3 ССÊ鳿c 2026-07-14 9/450 2026-07-15 16:04 by °²¾²µÄÖªÁË
[ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å] ũҵ»úеѧ±¨Í¶¸åÖÜÆÚ +3 G0DLIN 2026-07-14 7/350 2026-07-15 09:26 by xs74101122
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ¹ú×ÔÈ»ÃæÉÏD¿ÚÆíµ» +4 monkeynana 2026-07-14 4/200 2026-07-15 09:14 by °×Ë®Öó
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ûÊÕµ½ÏûÏ¢£¬ÔÙ´ÎÅãÅÜ +3 Ìì¿ÕÐdz½fly 2026-07-14 3/150 2026-07-14 19:14 by 6543yes
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] Ã÷ÌìE¿ÚÃæÉÏ»áÆÀ +8 ²¼²¼ºÍÒ»¶þ 2026-07-12 9/450 2026-07-13 22:59 by QTSorange
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û