24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 799  |  回复: 2

yunliyx01

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] Journal of alloys and compounds审稿意见回来,大修。各位虫友帮忙看看一条意见。已有2人参与

In 3.2 authors write: "We suggest that stress does not directly act on domain wall movement, when external stress applied on the specimen, the dimension of the material will be micro-changed and this in turn produces a corresponding micro magnetic field, we call this as strictionmagnetization, the inverse magnetostriction effect. Under the micro magnetic field, the domain walls will move to obtain an alignment between the spontaneous magnetization direction and the field direction." -(我们写的)
This is strange statement.(审稿人说这个是一个奇怪的论述)
The application of either stress or magnetic field to a magnetic material results in a change to the anisotropy energy in the material. This will cause in turn the magnetization in the material as a whole to redistribute in order to reduce the new energy. In terms of the domain structure, this redistribution is accommodated by either inducing movement of the domain walls to reduce the volume of domains magnetized unfavorably with respect to the field or the stress or by appropriate rotation of the magnetization within the domains. Also this effect is well-known as Villari or inverse magnetostriction effect which has been reported in textbooks and various papers. (审稿人给的一些论述)
So, the authors can con assign these results to themselves!(就是这句话不太明白,特别是那个can con,词典查出来好像都不对,我是理解为“不能”,意思是作者不能将这些结果归于他们自己! 还是放大con“反面、反对“的意思,审稿人说作者的描述不应与这些已存于教科书和论文中的论文中的结果相悖,我趋向于前面的理解,因为我感觉我们的描述似乎和审稿人给的有点相似啊)

各位虫友帮忙看看,讨论下啊。
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

adamjn

木虫 (正式写手)

maybe its cannot
2楼2015-06-26 00:09:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

风之梦

木虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
we call this as strictionmagnetization, the inverse magnetostriction effect. 审稿人说这个是教科书上的,你不能说是你们的
3楼2015-07-10 08:09:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 yunliyx01 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见