|
|
[ÇóÖú]
°ïæ¿´ÏÂÉó¸åÈ˸øµÄÆÀÓïÊÇʲôÒâ˼£¿ ÒÑÓÐ2È˲ÎÓë
Éó¸åÒâ¼û£ºThe paper is a bit difficult to follow but well organized. The issues are basically the innovation included and the results achieved. While a very focused paper is evaluated for a journal publication the quality of the results w.r.t. the state of the art is very important. In this case the authors just compared their results on a very small set of images and with quite old approaches even if they mentioned also pretty new ones. I strongly suggest to improve the experimentations and underline the advantage w.r.t. the state of the art. Currently the paper is not very convincing.
ÕâÀï¡°underline the advantage w.r.t. the state of the art¡±ÊÇɶÒâ˼°¡£¿ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÌåÖÆÄÚ³¤±²ËµÌåÖÆÄÚ¾ø´ó²¿·ÖÒ»±²×ÓÔڵײ㣬ÈçͬÄãÃÇÒ»Ñù´ó²¿·ÖÆÕͨ½ÌʦæÇÒÊÕÈëµÍ
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ΪʲôÖйú´óѧ¹¤¿Æ½ÌÊÚÃÇË®ÁËÄÇô¶àËùνµÄ¶¥»á¶¥¿¯£¬µ«»¹ÊÇ×ö²»³öÓîÊ÷»úÆ÷ÈË£¿
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
|