| 查看: 1366 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
lavender_12新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
求助：审稿人的问题该如何回答？ 已有3人参与
|
||
|
审稿人是这么问的： Q1: In the final paragraph of the introduction, it is stated that "the influence of hydrogen ions" as one of the main parameters will be discussed, but, such an issue was not addressed in the text. 我是这么回答的 A1: We agree with the reviewer's comments. We listed hydrogen ions as one of the main parameters; however, it is not acceptable for inclusion in the manuscript. Therefore, we deleted the part of the influence of hydrogen ions. Deleting "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction was missed. The revision is highlighted on page 3. 我的回答是否合适？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有17人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有5人回复
-
看板上这么多中的，有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉……
已经有3人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有5人回复
-
我不理解！
已经有23人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有10人回复
-
系统查不到
已经有10人回复
-
怎么查啊
已经有5人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 急求投稿时这样的问题应该怎样回答？
已经有4人回复
- 文章大修，审稿人问题比较尖锐
已经有31人回复
- 文章的审稿意见回来了，觉得审稿人意见有问题，想写argue，请教怎么写argue
已经有9人回复
- 审稿意见不好回答的问题该如何解释？求经验！
已经有8人回复
- 审稿人意见如何答复！
已经有5人回复
- 如何回复审稿人意见
已经有17人回复
- 主编回复小修接收，但是没有发审稿人的意见，该如何办？
已经有6人回复
- 如果确实没有条件补实验，该怎么回答审稿人合适？
已经有13人回复
- 怎样回答审稿人的问题
已经有8人回复
- 审稿人的问题需要都回答吗
已经有42人回复
- 语言方面的问题，如何回复审稿人？
已经有19人回复
- 审稿人提的问题太大，解决不了，如何回复审稿人？
已经有11人回复
- 如何回复审稿人的意见
已经有7人回复
- 如何回答审稿人问题
已经有4人回复
- 不知道怎么回答审稿人的问题，求助大家,(关于分子筛MCM-41的）
已经有10人回复
- 高分求助：如何给编辑写email驳斥审稿人的审稿意见
已经有8人回复
- 如何回答审稿人的这个问题
已经有9人回复
- 审稿人没有大问题，就是对我的一个方法产生怀疑，怎么解释？
已经有9人回复
- 关于推荐审稿人的一个问题
已经有18人回复
- 急急急！！！求助各位虫友，如何回答审稿人补充实验的问题
已经有28人回复
- 重金求助如何回答审稿人提出的改投它刊的建议
已经有14人回复
- 怎么回复审稿人？
已经有16人回复
- 审稿人意见求助，怎么回答呢
已经有11人回复
- 请教如何回答这个审稿人的意见
已经有11人回复
lavender_12
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 11 (小学生)
- 金币: 6.6
- 散金: 72
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 407
- 在线: 267.6小时
- 虫号: 1054230
- 注册: 2010-07-08
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 环境污染化学
送红花一朵 |
We had listed hydrogen ions as one of the main parameters in the original manuscript; and this part of the influence of hydrogen ions was deleted when we revised the paper, since it is not necessary to include the effect of hydrogen ions in the manuscript. However, we missed to delete "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction because of our carelessness. The revision is highlighted on page 3. 请您帮我看下，我的回答还有没有不合适的地方。dispensable和not necessary用哪个更合适？另外你没看懂的那句意思是由于我的疏忽，我忘记了删除"hydrogen ions"。 |
5楼2015-01-17 16:54:35
yiranyiqiong
银虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 231 (大学生)
- 金币: 500.7
- 散金: 400
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 826
- 在线: 66小时
- 虫号: 3569905
- 注册: 2014-12-01
- 专业: 环境工程
2楼2015-01-16 23:12:02
3楼2015-01-17 08:17:29
自私的猫1988
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 4800 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 6.746
- 金币: 50040.4
- 散金: 11517
- 红花: 256
- 沙发: 134
- 帖子: 11684
- 在线: 1473.7小时
- 虫号: 2004083
- 注册: 2012-09-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机分子功能材料化学
- 管辖: 论文投稿
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
lavender_12: 金币+4, ★★★很有帮助, We had listed hydrogen ions as one of the main parameters in the original manuscript; and this part of the influence of hydrogen ions was deleted when we revised the paper, since it is not necessary to include the effect of hydrogen ions in the manuscript. However, we missed to delete "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction because of our carelessness. The revision is highlighted on page 3. 2015-01-17 16:48:58
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
lavender_12: 金币+4, ★★★很有帮助, We had listed hydrogen ions as one of the main parameters in the original manuscript; and this part of the influence of hydrogen ions was deleted when we revised the paper, since it is not necessary to include the effect of hydrogen ions in the manuscript. However, we missed to delete "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction because of our carelessness. The revision is highlighted on page 3. 2015-01-17 16:48:58
|
We agree with the reviewer's comments. We listed hydrogen ions as one of the main parameters; however, it is not acceptable for inclusion in the manuscript. Therefore, we deleted the part of the influence of hydrogen ions. Deleting "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction was missed. The revision is highlighted on page 3. ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— We agreed with the reviewer's comments. The hydrogen ions was listed as one of the main parameters surely. However, with respect to the manuscript, it was a dispensable part. Therefore, we deleted the part of the influence of hydrogen ions. Deleting "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction was missed(这句话没看懂，可以去掉吧). The revision was highlighted on page 3. |
» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
4楼2015-01-17 14:20:10
