24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1067  |  回复: 4

lavender_12

新虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 求助:审稿人的问题该如何回答?已有3人参与

审稿人是这么问的: Q1: In the final paragraph of the introduction, it is stated that "the influence of hydrogen ions" as one of the main parameters will be discussed, but, such an issue was not addressed in the text.

我是这么回答的
A1:
We agree with the reviewer's comments. We listed hydrogen ions as one of the main parameters; however, it is not acceptable for inclusion in the manuscript. Therefore, we deleted the part of the influence of hydrogen ions. Deleting "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction was missed. The revision is highlighted on page 3.

我的回答是否合适?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yiranyiqiong

银虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
lavender_12: 金币+3 2015-01-17 16:49:27
你可以简要说明这是可能因素,在后期实验或者插入参考文献指出,点到即可,而不是简要删除这个问题,能提出一个小问题也是很好的,毕竟大家都会认同这个观点

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
2楼2015-01-16 23:12:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

antericol

新虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
lavender_12: 金币+3, ★★★很有帮助 2015-01-17 16:49:21
我觉得你答得可以

可以再加上The hydrogen ion may merely bear a minor impact, aas the current data did not indicate the magnitude of this effect.

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
3楼2015-01-17 08:17:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

自私的猫1988

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
lavender_12: 金币+4, ★★★很有帮助, We had listed hydrogen ions as one of the main parameters in the original manuscript; and this part of the influence of hydrogen ions was deleted when we revised the paper, since it is not necessary to include the effect of hydrogen ions in the manuscript. However, we missed to delete "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction because of our carelessness. The revision is highlighted on page 3. 2015-01-17 16:48:58
We agree with the reviewer's comments. We listed hydrogen ions as one of the main parameters; however, it is not acceptable for inclusion in the manuscript. Therefore, we deleted the part of the influence of hydrogen ions. Deleting "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction was missed. The revision is highlighted on page 3.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
We agreed with the reviewer's comments. The hydrogen ions was listed as one of the main parameters surely. However, with respect to the manuscript, it was a dispensable part. Therefore, we deleted the part of the influence of hydrogen ions. Deleting "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction was missed(这句话没看懂,可以去掉吧). The revision was highlighted on page 3.

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

4楼2015-01-17 14:20:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lavender_12

新虫 (正式写手)

送红花一朵
引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by 自私的猫1988 at 2015-01-17 14:20:10
We agree with the reviewer's comments. We listed hydrogen ions as one of the main parameters; however, it is not acceptable for inclusion in the manuscript. Therefore, we deleted the part of the infl ...

We had listed hydrogen ions as one of the main parameters in the original manuscript; and this part of the influence of hydrogen ions was deleted when we revised the paper, since it is not necessary to include the effect of hydrogen ions in the manuscript. However, we missed to delete "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction because of our carelessness. The revision is highlighted on page 3.

请您帮我看下,我的回答还有没有不合适的地方。dispensable和not necessary用哪个更合适?另外你没看懂的那句意思是由于我的疏忽,我忘记了删除"hydrogen ions"。
5楼2015-01-17 16:54:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 lavender_12 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见