24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 447  |  回复: 1

c843597029

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] SCI论文审稿意见返回,有几条看不懂,求大神指点,该怎么修改 已有1人参与

Reviewer #2: This paper describes an interesting combination of algorithms to track pedestrians. The algorithm allows tracking of single and multiple persons and handles occlusions.

It would be interesting to hear something about computation time.

Page 2/47: on a series of gait images

Page 2/59: systems by walking

Page 16 / Fig 9: it is unclear what is a, b, …

Reviewer #4: we can't see any measurement of improving tracking performance in time
metaheuristic used is not clear, and how you compare it with a tensor model.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

geyaolove8

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
c843597029: 金币+1, 有帮助 2015-01-07 10:20:39
说你的观点很有趣,但是有些地方没说清楚。
比如第四个审稿人说你没有测量怎么就知道,你如何拿它与模型比较
一时的勇气和力量证明不了什么,长期的奋斗坚持才是王道!
2楼2015-01-05 17:05:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 c843597029 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见