| 查看: 3286 | 回复: 11 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
秋收木虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
journal of power source审稿意见，大家帮忙分析一下 已有6人参与
|
|
|
journal of power source审稿意见，大家帮忙分析一下，返回修改稿后，修改部分还忘记用红色标注出来，不知道会不会被拒啊 Ms. No.: POWER-D- Title: Study on a high current density redox flow battery with tin(Ⅱ)/tin as negative couple Corresponding Author: Mr Liu Dear Mr Liu, I have now received the referees' reviews on your paper referenced above. I am afraid that the referees conclude that the paper is not suitable for publication in its present form. If you are able to correct the paper taking into account all of the points raised in the referees' report (below), I would be willing to arrange for the paper to be reviewed again. According to the journal guidelines revisions should be submitted within 30 days. If you choose to revise your manuscript it will be due into the Editorial Office by the Dec 29, 2014. Please submit your revision online within by logging onto the Elsevier Editorial System for Journal of Power Sources: http://ees.elsevier.com/power/ Your username is: ****** The manuscript record can be found in the "Submissions Needing Revision" menu. (If you have forgotten your password, please click the "Forget your password" link located on the log-in screen.) When submitting your revised paper, please include a separate document uploaded as "Response to Reviews" that carefully addresses the issues raised in the below comments, point by point. You should also include a suitable rebuttal to any specific request for change that has not been made. To assist the review process, it is essential that all corrections made to the text (in response to both the Editor's and the reviewer's comments) are highlighted in red type. To facilitate the electronic publication of your manuscript (should it be accepted), we request that you upload electronic source files for the text and figures. These files should include the text, tables and figure legend in an editable electronic format (MS Word, WordPerfect, LaTeX, RTF) and all figures saved individually as TIF, JPEG, EPS, PDF or MS Office files. Information and instructions about the file types and formatting of figures can be found at: http://www.elsevier.com/artworkinstructions Please note that this journal offers a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown next to published articles on ScienceDirect (see also http://www.elsevier.com/audioslides). If your paper is accepted for publication, you will automatically receive an invitation to create an AudioSlides presentation. Thank you, and we look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. With kind regards, Z. Ogumi Editor Journal of Power Sources Journal of Power Sources, Editorial Office E-mail: power@elsevier.com Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1 The submission reports a study on using Sn/Sn2+ as a negative redox couple in a redox flow battery with VO2+/VO2+ positive redox couple. The results showed that the battery is able to operate at a high current density. While there are some merits, the present paper lacks reasonable scientific discussion. Below are some major issues of the paper that the authors need to address before acceptance for publication. * Improving English proficiency is generally needed. No grammar errors should be allowed. * In the second paragraph of Results and Discussion session, explain why the CV scan indicates irreversible kinetics? * Also explain the meanings of symbols used in the equation. * In the second paragraph of section 3.2 as well as Fig.3, how is the energy efficiency of 72% derived? Why in the Abstract it became a voltage efficiency? * Explain why the battery voltage in Fig.4 is not stable with time. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
接受任何调剂
已经有6人回复
-
22408 312求调剂
已经有26人回复
-
收到复试调剂但是去不了
已经有8人回复
-
260求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
急需调剂
已经有10人回复
-
申博/考博
已经有4人回复
-
化工学硕294分，求导师收留
已经有37人回复
-
求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
一志愿华中农业071010，320求调剂
已经有19人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 求助 Journal of Materials Chemistry C 的审稿状态，急！
已经有10人回复
- 请大家帮忙看下这个审稿意见怎么处理好
已经有22人回复
- 请大家帮我分析下审稿意见
已经有18人回复
- Energy的审稿意见，望各位大侠指导
已经有22人回复
- ECM审稿意见返回了，求各位帮忙解读一下，谢谢
已经有28人回复
- 请问Journal of power source 是哪个国家的？
已经有11人回复
- 第一次投稿，收到反馈意见，请大家帮忙参谋一下。
已经有8人回复
- 求助 Journal of Chromatographic Science审稿人意见回答
已经有4人回复
- Science China E, 审稿意见返回了，请大家给点意见
已经有18人回复
- 大家帮看一下这个审稿意见棘手不，谢谢了。
已经有22人回复
- materials letters 审稿意见大家帮忙看一下啊，谢谢
已经有17人回复
- sensors and actuators B 审稿意见回来了，请帮看看。
已经有21人回复
- International Journal of Thermal Sciences,4个审稿人，3个修改后接收，1个拒
已经有19人回复
- 这种审稿意见是什么意思啊？怎么回复好哦
已经有41人回复
- 专家审稿意见，请大家帮忙分析！
已经有5人回复
- 有关Angew的审稿问题，祈求大家的意见
已经有8人回复
- 谁见过这样的审稿意见？
已经有34人回复
- 审稿结束后 with editor 好多天了，请大家发表一下看法
已经有29人回复
- 论文一审回来了，有一些审稿意见，请大家帮我看看是什么意思。
已经有5人回复
- 投过journal of power source 的讲一下
已经有6人回复
- 关于Journal of Power Source
已经有13人回复
dzj0911
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 20 (小学生)
- 金币: 3533.1
- 散金: 1536
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 397
- 在线: 92.2小时
- 虫号: 1543840
- 注册: 2011-12-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 肿瘤生物治疗
9楼2014-12-27 07:07:51
guoliwang
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 140 (高中生)
- 金币: 13195.8
- 散金: 45
- 红花: 25
- 帖子: 4963
- 在线: 501.2小时
- 虫号: 3520910
- 注册: 2014-11-05
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 生物化学
秋收
2楼2014-12-26 11:18:40
秋收
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2665.4
- 散金: 16
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 989
- 在线: 258.1小时
- 虫号: 417265
- 注册: 2007-07-01
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 材料物理化学
3楼2014-12-26 11:22:25
guoliwang
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 140 (高中生)
- 金币: 13195.8
- 散金: 45
- 红花: 25
- 帖子: 4963
- 在线: 501.2小时
- 虫号: 3520910
- 注册: 2014-11-05
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 生物化学
4楼2014-12-26 11:51:31
20