| 查看: 2594 | 回复: 69 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
文章大修，估计希望渺茫，先散尽，兑现以前承诺。（附审稿意见）
|
|||
|
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The proposed manuscript proposed a study how the energy is transferred between rotors via the oscillating body allowing the implementation of synchronization of rotors. The paper proposed new relevant results. I didn’t see any algebraic errors. I would like to suggest minor revisions: 1. Inclusion of some papers in order to complete the state of the art: Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 2793–2806, 200,J. of the Braz. Soc. of Mech. Sci. & Eng. 2003, Vol. XXV, No. 4 / 391 and Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 13 (7), 1246-1255 2. Future works need to be addressed. 3. Maybe some minor comments on Chaos will be welcome 4. About experimental works? The paper deserves publication. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author The paper is interesting, however all presented results were already published in: - M. Kapitaniak, K. Czolczynski, P. Perlikowski, A. Stefanski, T. Kapitaniak, Synchronous states of slowly rotating pendula, Physics Reports 541 (2014) - M. Kapitaniak, M. Lazarek, M. Nielaczny, K. Czolczynski, P. Perlikowski, T. Kapitaniak, Synchronization extends the life time of the desired behavior of globally coupled systems, Scientific Reports 4 (2014). Therefore I recommend to reject paper. Reviewer: 3 Comments to the Author This is a bit of a re-do of the work of in this context, see also the papers [9-13]. In a similar vein parametric roll for ships has been stuied from an energy angle. The work is interesting but should be better placed in the context of similar approaches. I advise the authors also to look carefully at more recent papers by the authors of [19]. The phrasing follwing (59) is obscure. 悲剧了，对审稿人2。。。。。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有13人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有13人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有15人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
8楼2014-11-18 10:06:13
14楼2014-11-18 10:20:14
简单回复
无为之人2楼
2014-11-18 09:56
回复
ckfangpan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
1 [ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
假大空6楼
2014-11-18 10:02
回复
ckfangpan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
男人回家10楼
2014-11-18 10:06
回复
ckfangpan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
， [ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
30