24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1030  |  回复: 5
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

qq7880809

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 我的论文审稿意见回来了,还有没有戏啊? 已有3人参与

Review comments:

The paper uses XXXX to study XXXXX. Some experiments (mainly simulations) are provided.

I think the paper deals with a nice application of XXXXXXXX and, thus it could be of interest to the readers of this journal. However, I am not confident that it fits the (high) quality standards of this journal. A very hard work is required to revise it and I'm not sure that it can be accepted for publication.

My biggest concern is about writing style and presentation. The paper is poorly written and in many parts it is hard to follow. While the idea of adopting XXXX model to study XXXXX is fascinating, it is hard to see how it has been concretely applied by the authors. The background discussion about the possible causes of railway faults is confused and it does not explain why XXXXX is a good tool in modelling XXXXX. Some details on the real case study coudl be useful. I would suggest to greatly expand this part by clearly pointing out how real-life criteria developed in the XXXX domain have been translated into features of adopted XXXXX model.

The paper completely lacks a related work section so it is hard to see if other studies have been done in this research area and, then, to judge whether this paper actually extends/advances the state of the art or not.
The equations presented in the paper are poorly commented and it is hard to check to what extent the differ from traditional equations developed within the XXX theory.
Simulations are also poor and some of the presented results appear obvious.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wyliu_as

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

不看好,不过大修一下还是有希望的,楼主一定要把试验的精华彻底挖掘出来。
请大家去我的版面看看,正在收集开源期刊,http://emuch.net/bbs/myf.php?ffid=282
6楼2014-09-09 19:02:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 6 个回答

自私的猫1988

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
qq7880809: 金币+5, 有帮助 2014-09-17 15:20:24
这个算大修吧,而且修改不好的话,拒的可能性非常大
LZ需要对文章进行大范围的修改,包括语言、背景知识介绍(研究进展)等等
2楼2014-09-05 15:53:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

qq7880809

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 自私的猫1988 at 2014-09-05 15:53:26
这个算大修吧,而且修改不好的话,拒的可能性非常大
LZ需要对文章进行大范围的修改,包括语言、背景知识介绍(研究进展)等等

谢谢
3楼2014-09-06 13:57:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangy6

木虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖

比较负面。 如果楼主需要尽快发表论文的话  最好改投别的杂志。
4楼2014-09-09 17:09:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见