| 查看: 1034 | 回复: 5 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
我的论文审稿意见回来了，还有没有戏啊？ 已有3人参与
|
||
|
Review comments: The paper uses XXXX to study XXXXX. Some experiments (mainly simulations) are provided. I think the paper deals with a nice application of XXXXXXXX and, thus it could be of interest to the readers of this journal. However, I am not confident that it fits the (high) quality standards of this journal. A very hard work is required to revise it and I'm not sure that it can be accepted for publication. My biggest concern is about writing style and presentation. The paper is poorly written and in many parts it is hard to follow. While the idea of adopting XXXX model to study XXXXX is fascinating, it is hard to see how it has been concretely applied by the authors. The background discussion about the possible causes of railway faults is confused and it does not explain why XXXXX is a good tool in modelling XXXXX. Some details on the real case study coudl be useful. I would suggest to greatly expand this part by clearly pointing out how real-life criteria developed in the XXXX domain have been translated into features of adopted XXXXX model. The paper completely lacks a related work section so it is hard to see if other studies have been done in this research area and, then, to judge whether this paper actually extends/advances the state of the art or not. The equations presented in the paper are poorly commented and it is hard to check to what extent the differ from traditional equations developed within the XXX theory. Simulations are also poor and some of the presented results appear obvious. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有10人回复
-
2025年遐想
已经有4人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
-
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 审稿啥意思，有没有希望
已经有4人回复
- 论文三审中，可审稿意见回来了，主编迟迟没给我，是枪毙的节奏吗？
已经有4人回复
- 怎样写审稿意见
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见打回来了，小弟第一次投稿，如何面对，求助专家
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见回来让重投
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见该如何回答，reconsider my decision是啥意思？
已经有10人回复
- 关于《电网技术》论文一审意见回来修改后还需要再给专家审稿吗？
已经有8人回复
- 大修，三个审稿人只给我两个人的意见
已经有7人回复
- 悲催的审稿意见，我该怎么办
已经有12人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，论文该如何修改？
已经有31人回复
- 审稿意见回来，一小修，两拒
已经有7人回复
- 第一篇SCI审稿意见回来了，真的很头大。。。
已经有89人回复
- 投nanotechnology后意见返回，编辑说让我登录页面去查审稿意见，但是却查不到
已经有6人回复
- 目前一篇SCI论文正在审稿中，但现在发现了文章中的一些问题，怎么办
已经有41人回复
- JPCC一个审稿意见就给回来了
已经有16人回复
- 一审意见回来了，一个审稿人竭力推荐发表，另一个认为无新意...
已经有34人回复
- SCI审稿意见回来了，编辑给的moderate revision，麻烦大家帮分析一下，有BB
已经有28人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，要补做实验，但实验条件不够
已经有12人回复
- 投了一篇文章，审稿结果是“major revision”，帮忙看看评审意见，有戏没？
已经有32人回复
- 审稿意见返回，有个审稿人要求参考他的一篇文章
已经有10人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，大家帮忙看一下。。
已经有9人回复
- 审稿人之间能看到对方的审稿意见吗？
已经有64人回复
- 审稿意见，第一次投稿不知道还有没有戏？大家帮助看看，导师不管，没有人问
已经有4人回复
- 第一篇英文审稿意见，大修，请大家看看有没有希望？
已经有13人回复
- 文章的审稿意见回来了 在编辑那里半个月了还没消息
已经有16人回复
3楼2014-09-06 13:57:15