| 查看: 5633 | 回复: 44 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
optics letters审稿结束,等待编辑给结果,忐忑中~
|
|||
|
前段时间投的optics letters. 现在审稿结束,应该是等待编辑处理了吧。。希望能有好消息。。 具体状态如下: Peer Review Your manuscript is in peer review. Reviewer Request Status Review Status Reviewer 1 More Time Accepted (06 八月 2014) Complete (18 八月 2014) Reviewer 2 More Time Accepted (05 八月 2014) Complete (19 八月 2014) Reviewer 3 Too Busy (08 八月 2014) Reviewer 4 Agree (05 八月 2014) Complete (13 八月 2014) 这是上一个帖子的续文~ http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=7748279 大家快来祝福我吧。金币不多,先分10个。如果得到好消息了,散100金给大家。 |
» 猜你喜欢
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写
已经有11人回复
救命帖
已经有5人回复
限项规定
已经有5人回复
为什么nbs上溴 没有产物点出现呢
已经有9人回复
招博士
已经有3人回复
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有35人回复
最失望的一年
已经有18人回复
求推荐博导
已经有4人回复
求推荐英文EI期刊
已经有5人回复
疑惑?
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
至今没有消息也许就是坏消息吧
已经有7人回复
没有消息是坏消息吗
已经有18人回复
Optics Letters小修后还要返回审稿人吗?
已经有16人回复
急询:CHINESE OPTICS LETTERS 审稿状态!!!!
已经有6人回复
optics letters 几个审稿人
已经有3人回复
Optics Express 投稿过程
已经有12人回复
Optics Letters 具体的peer review status 在哪看的到?
已经有9人回复
自动化学报,进入“等待副主编建议”,忐忑
已经有10人回复
Optics Letters返回两个审稿意见,一个不用修改直接接收,一个大改,编辑让重投。。
已经有23人回复
Optics Letters投稿一周收到编辑回信怎么只有一个审稿人的意见
已经有7人回复
有谁知道Optics Letters的审稿政策(审稿人多久不回复就换审稿人?)
已经有16人回复
等待编辑处理,这个一般需要多久啊
已经有6人回复
外审10几天就回来了,等待主编裁决,忐忑
已经有20人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
南佛罗里达大学化学系刘文奇课题组 2026 Fall 招收有机/超分子方向博士生
+2/922
南佛罗里达大学化学系刘文奇课题组 2026 Fall 招收有机/超分子方向博士生
+2/920
浙江师范大学招收大气遥感、光学或人工智能方向的2026年物理学博士生1名
+2/274
专任教师招聘
+1/172
东北大学-招收2026年硕士研究生2-3名(金属材料3D打印方向)
+5/170
招聘启事 江南大学乳品加工与营养健康团队博士后招聘
+2/128
海南大学专任教师招聘:海洋工程与海洋智能装备相关方向【长期有效】
+2/116
征婚
+1/95
保障电池制造超纯环境:威格科技电池生产全线解决方案
+1/86
几个高校工作如何选择?
+1/76
信息工程大学教授团队网络空间安全专业博士招生【2026年1月31日报名截止】
+1/72
自驾淄博回四川遂宁过年,寻找小伙伴一起
+1/66
中山大学农业与生物技术学院周潇峰课题组诚聘微生物/植物病理学方向科研助理
+1/43
深圳大学信息功能聚合物电介质方向“申请-考核制”博士生招生
+2/36
【教授本人】南佛罗里达大学化学系刘文奇课题组 2026 Fall 招收有机/超分子方向博士生
+1/27
南开大学齐迹课题组诚聘分子生物学、免疫学、有机分子合成相关方向的博士后、博士硕士
+1/3
山东大学(青岛校区)招博士后(COF\MOF\催化\电池)
+1/2
山东师范大学海外优青(校长团队)招聘硕士/博士/博后
+1/2
换工作
+1/2
多伦多城市大学计算机视觉方向博士后
+1/1
6楼2014-08-20 18:21:17
3楼2014-08-20 18:17:03
9楼2014-08-20 18:26:53
|
审稿意见出来了。。让修改。 Your manuscript can be considered for publication in Optics Letters provided that you make mandatory revisions to your manuscript that address the reviewer concerns. The reviews are appended below. Note the one revision policy. I was tempted to reject but decided to give a chance to revise. Please use strike-out and different colour to indicate changes made to the original manuscript, plus a detailed letter to describe the changes made. It is the policy of Optics Letters to allow only one revision. Thus it is important to respond to all of the reviewer points and to make it evident that you have done so. For this reason, please note any changes that have been made to the manuscript, and their location by redlining, in your response. You will copy and paste your response into a designated comment text box provided online, or if you prefer you may upload your response file in the space provided. Failure to provide a list of revisions and indicate the changes in the revised manuscript will result in delay in the publication or rejection of the manuscript. Of course, you may not agree with the reviewers on every point; in this case, your responses and reasoning should be clearly presented. 审稿人1:its modeling is timely and of significant interest. Moreover, the manuscript contains interesting aspects on this topic. Nevertheless, I have some major concerns with the manuscript as detailed in the following。。提了很多问题。 审稿人2:the manuscript appears to reveal some important discrepancy and, apparently, deficiency of the model based on new statistical findings. The manuscript gives a very good survey in the introduction that puts the work into an appropriate context. Some simulation data are then provided side-by-side with the experimental data. With a good agreement in ....However, some data were not presented too clearly and quantitatively.提了一些问题。 审稿人3:The paper is a very well written report of a very interesting study of the....The authors might consider making a stronger statement in this regard, by way of justified speculation. It was a pleasure to read this paper. There are a few minor corrections: 几处笔误。 兑现之前的承诺,先散金20,等文章中了再给大家80金吧。。。不好意思,我就一点点金币。。。。 大家看看审稿意见如何。希望投过OL的给些指导意见。 编辑的一句话:Note the one revision policy. I was tempted to reject but decided to give a chance to revise. 感觉挺吓人的,是套话吗? 谢谢大家参与。 |
13楼2014-08-21 10:34:59
简单回复
wenw20004楼
2014-08-20 18:20
回复
lnqswjtu(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 [ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
zimoruyan12楼
2014-08-20 18:41
回复















回复此楼
楼主好运!
