| 查看: 6615 | 回复: 44 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
optics letters审稿结束，等待编辑给结果，忐忑中~
|
|||
|
前段时间投的optics letters. 现在审稿结束，应该是等待编辑处理了吧。。希望能有好消息。。 具体状态如下： Peer Review Your manuscript is in peer review. Reviewer Request Status Review Status Reviewer 1 More Time Accepted (06 八月 2014) Complete (18 八月 2014) Reviewer 2 More Time Accepted (05 八月 2014) Complete (19 八月 2014) Reviewer 3 Too Busy (08 八月 2014) Reviewer 4 Agree (05 八月 2014) Complete (13 八月 2014) 这是上一个帖子的续文~ http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=7748279 大家快来祝福我吧。金币不多，先分10个。如果得到好消息了，散100金给大家。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有17人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有4人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有5人回复
-
我不理解！
已经有23人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有10人回复
-
系统查不到
已经有10人回复
-
怎么查啊
已经有5人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有10人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有25人回复
-
2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件，有关系吗？
已经有28人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 至今没有消息也许就是坏消息吧
已经有7人回复
- 没有消息是坏消息吗
已经有18人回复
- Optics Letters小修后还要返回审稿人吗？
已经有16人回复
- 急询：CHINESE OPTICS LETTERS 审稿状态！！！！
已经有6人回复
- optics letters 几个审稿人
已经有3人回复
- Optics Express 投稿过程
已经有12人回复
- Optics Letters 具体的peer review status 在哪看的到？
已经有9人回复
- 自动化学报，进入“等待副主编建议”，忐忑
已经有10人回复
- Optics Letters返回两个审稿意见，一个不用修改直接接收，一个大改，编辑让重投。。
已经有23人回复
- Optics Letters投稿一周收到编辑回信怎么只有一个审稿人的意见
已经有7人回复
- 有谁知道Optics Letters的审稿政策（审稿人多久不回复就换审稿人？）
已经有16人回复
- 等待编辑处理，这个一般需要多久啊
已经有6人回复
- 外审10几天就回来了，等待主编裁决，忐忑
已经有20人回复
楼主好运！ 6楼2014-08-20 18:21:17
3楼2014-08-20 18:17:03
9楼2014-08-20 18:26:53
|
审稿意见出来了。。让修改。 Your manuscript can be considered for publication in Optics Letters provided that you make mandatory revisions to your manuscript that address the reviewer concerns. The reviews are appended below. Note the one revision policy. I was tempted to reject but decided to give a chance to revise. Please use strike-out and different colour to indicate changes made to the original manuscript, plus a detailed letter to describe the changes made. It is the policy of Optics Letters to allow only one revision. Thus it is important to respond to all of the reviewer points and to make it evident that you have done so. For this reason, please note any changes that have been made to the manuscript, and their location by redlining, in your response. You will copy and paste your response into a designated comment text box provided online, or if you prefer you may upload your response file in the space provided. Failure to provide a list of revisions and indicate the changes in the revised manuscript will result in delay in the publication or rejection of the manuscript. Of course, you may not agree with the reviewers on every point; in this case, your responses and reasoning should be clearly presented. 审稿人1：its modeling is timely and of significant interest. Moreover, the manuscript contains interesting aspects on this topic. Nevertheless, I have some major concerns with the manuscript as detailed in the following。。提了很多问题。 审稿人2:the manuscript appears to reveal some important discrepancy and, apparently, deficiency of the model based on new statistical findings. The manuscript gives a very good survey in the introduction that puts the work into an appropriate context. Some simulation data are then provided side-by-side with the experimental data. With a good agreement in ....However, some data were not presented too clearly and quantitatively.提了一些问题。 审稿人3:The paper is a very well written report of a very interesting study of the....The authors might consider making a stronger statement in this regard, by way of justified speculation. It was a pleasure to read this paper. There are a few minor corrections: 几处笔误。 兑现之前的承诺，先散金20，等文章中了再给大家80金吧。。。不好意思，我就一点点金币。。。。 大家看看审稿意见如何。希望投过OL的给些指导意见。 编辑的一句话：Note the one revision policy. I was tempted to reject but decided to give a chance to revise. 感觉挺吓人的，是套话吗? 谢谢大家参与。 |
13楼2014-08-21 10:34:59
简单回复
wenw20004楼
2014-08-20 18:20
回复
lnqswjtu(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 [ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
zimoruyan12楼
2014-08-20 18:41
回复
