| ²é¿´: 5768 | »Ø¸´: 44 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
[½»Á÷]
optics lettersÉó¸å½áÊø£¬µÈ´ý±à¼¸ø½á¹û£¬ìþìýÖÐ~
|
|||
|
ǰ¶Îʱ¼äͶµÄoptics letters. ÏÖÔÚÉó¸å½áÊø£¬Ó¦¸ÃÊǵȴý±à¼´¦ÀíÁ˰ɡ£¡£Ï£ÍûÄÜÓкÃÏûÏ¢¡£¡£ ¾ßÌå״̬ÈçÏ£º Peer Review Your manuscript is in peer review. Reviewer Request Status Review Status Reviewer 1 More Time Accepted (06 °ËÔ 2014) Complete (18 °ËÔ 2014) Reviewer 2 More Time Accepted (05 °ËÔ 2014) Complete (19 °ËÔ 2014) Reviewer 3 Too Busy (08 °ËÔ 2014) Reviewer 4 Agree (05 °ËÔ 2014) Complete (13 °ËÔ 2014) ÕâÊÇÉÏÒ»¸öÌû×ÓµÄÐøÎÄ~ http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=7748279 ´ó¼Ò¿ìÀ´×£¸£ÎÒ°É¡£½ð±Ò²»¶à£¬ÏÈ·Ö10¸ö¡£Èç¹ûµÃµ½ºÃÏûÏ¢ÁË£¬É¢100½ð¸ø´ó¼Ò¡£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
268Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÖØÇì´óѧ085700×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³×Ü·Ö308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
302Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
306Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏѧѧ˶080502 337Çóµ÷¼Á-Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖпƼ¼´óѧ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
313Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Äϲý´óѧ²ÄÁÏר˶311·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
316Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
346Çóµ÷¼Á[0856]
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
ÖÁ½ñûÓÐÏûÏ¢Ò²Ðí¾ÍÊÇ»µÏûÏ¢°É
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ûÓÐÏûÏ¢ÊÇ»µÏûÏ¢Âð
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
Optics LettersСÐÞºó»¹Òª·µ»ØÉó¸åÈËÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
¼±Ñ¯£ºCHINESE OPTICS LETTERS Éó¸å״̬£¡£¡£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
optics letters ¼¸¸öÉó¸åÈË
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Optics Express Ͷ¸å¹ý³Ì
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Optics Letters ¾ßÌåµÄpeer review status ÔÚÄÄ¿´µÄµ½£¿
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
×Ô¶¯»¯Ñ§±¨£¬½øÈë¡°µÈ´ý¸±Ö÷±à½¨Ò顱£¬ìþìý
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
Optics Letters·µ»ØÁ½¸öÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬Ò»¸ö²»ÓÃÐÞ¸ÄÖ±½Ó½ÓÊÕ£¬Ò»¸ö´ó¸Ä£¬±à¼ÈÃÖØÍ¶¡£¡£
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
Optics LettersͶ¸åÒ»ÖÜÊÕµ½±à¼»ØÐÅÔõôֻÓÐÒ»¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÓÐËÖªµÀOptics LettersµÄÉó¸åÕþ²ß£¨Éó¸åÈ˶à¾Ã²»»Ø¸´¾Í»»Éó¸åÈË£¿£©
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
µÈ´ý±à¼´¦Àí£¬Õâ¸öÒ»°ãÐèÒª¶à¾Ã°¡
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÍâÉó10¼¸Ìì¾Í»ØÀ´ÁË£¬µÈ´ýÖ÷±à²Ã¾ö£¬ìþìý
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
» ÇÀ½ð±ÒÀ²£¡»ØÌû¾Í¿ÉÒԵõ½:
ÉÜÐË´óѧ²©Ê¿½ÌʦÕÐÆ¸1루»¯Ñ§»¯¹¤Ïà¹Ø£©
+5/290
ÖйúµçÆø×°±¸¼¯ÍÅÑо¿ÔºÕÐÊÕAI+²ÄÁϵÈÏà¹Ø¸ÚλʵϰÉú
+1/88
²ÄÁÏ¡¢»¯Ñ§Àà˶ʿÑо¿Éúµ÷¼Á»ú»á£¬Ñ§Ë¶×¨Ë¶¾ù¿É£¬ÓÐÒâÇëÁªÏµ£¬·Ç³ÏÎðÈÅ£¡
+1/88
ÖÐɽ´óѧ»·¾³²ÄÁÏÍŶÓÕÐÆ¸
+1/88
Ìì½òÀí¹¤´óѧ¹ú¼Ò½ÜÇàÍõÌú¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ2026Ä격ʿÑо¿Éú
+1/82
ÖØÇìÒ½¿Æ´óѧÉñ¾¿ÆÑ§ÖÐÐÄ/²¡ÉúÓëÉúÀíϵ³ÏÑûº£ÄÚÍâÓÅÐ㲩ʿ¼ÓÃ˲©Ê¿ºó¶ÓÎ飨³¤ÆÚ£©
+1/81
ÖйúÒ©¿Æ´óѧ211-¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ2026²©Ê¿/˶ʿ-Óлú»¯Ñ§
+1/49
Çൺ¸ßУ Ñо¿ÉúÕÐÉú
+1/47
Ìì½ò³Ç½¨´óѧÕÐÊÕÎïÀí¡¢»¯Ñ§»òÕßÉúÎïµ÷¼ÁÉúÒ»Ãû£¬Ç°ÍùÌì½ò´óѧÁªºÏÅàÑø
+1/47
»¶Ó½»Á÷×Éѯ
+1/44
PBATÈܽâ×ö³ÉÈéÒº
+1/38
ÏæÌ¶´óѧ¡°¹ý³ÌÇ¿»¯ÓëÂÌÉ«»¯¹¤¡±´´ÐÂÍŶӲ¹ÕÐ2026ÄêÇïÈëѧ²©Ê¿Éú
+1/35
¸Õ¸Õ¹¤×÷²»¾ÃµÄ¹Â¶À¸Ð
+1/34
¹þ¹¤´óÖ£ÖݸߵÈÑо¿ÔºÁõÉÜÇÙÓë²éÕý±¦½ÌÊÚ¿ÎÌâ×é³ÏÕкϳÉÉúÎïѧ±³¾°Ïà¹ØµÄÓÅÐãÈ˲żÓÃË
+1/32
ÄϾ©Àí¹¤´óѧÓÅÇàÍŶÓÕÐÆ¸¸±½ÌÊÚ¡¢²©Ê¿ºó¡¢²©Ê¿¡¢Ë¶Ê¿Éú£¨»¯Ñ§¡¢´ß»¯·½Ïò£©
+1/30
Äþ²¨¶«·½Àí¹¤´óѧÓàÅô¿ÎÌâ×é2026ÄêÉϺ£½»´óÁªÅ಩ʿÉú¡¢²©Ê¿ºó¡¢¿ÆÑÐÖúÀíÕÐÆ¸
+1/14
Çൺ¿Æ¼¼´óѧ¿É³ÖÐø¸ß·Ö×ÓÍÅ¶Ó ¿¼ÑÐÕÐÉú
+1/6
»ªÖпƼ¼´óѧ¹ÜÀíѧԺÕÐÆ¸Éç»áÓù¤£¨¿ÆÑÐÖúÀí£©1Ãû
+1/5
±±¾©¸ßУ¸±Ð£³¤ÍŶÓÕÐÊÕ»úеÀ࣬»·¾³Ààѧ˶ºÍר˶
+1/5
Õã½´óѧ¸ß´¿·ÖÀëÍÅ¶Ó³ÏÆ¸²©Ê¿ºó
+1/1
|
Éó¸åÒâ¼û³öÀ´ÁË¡£¡£ÈÃÐ޸ġ£ Your manuscript can be considered for publication in Optics Letters provided that you make mandatory revisions to your manuscript that address the reviewer concerns. The reviews are appended below. Note the one revision policy. I was tempted to reject but decided to give a chance to revise. Please use strike-out and different colour to indicate changes made to the original manuscript, plus a detailed letter to describe the changes made. It is the policy of Optics Letters to allow only one revision. Thus it is important to respond to all of the reviewer points and to make it evident that you have done so. For this reason, please note any changes that have been made to the manuscript, and their location by redlining, in your response. You will copy and paste your response into a designated comment text box provided online, or if you prefer you may upload your response file in the space provided. Failure to provide a list of revisions and indicate the changes in the revised manuscript will result in delay in the publication or rejection of the manuscript. Of course, you may not agree with the reviewers on every point; in this case, your responses and reasoning should be clearly presented. Éó¸åÈË1£ºits modeling is timely and of significant interest. Moreover, the manuscript contains interesting aspects on this topic. Nevertheless, I have some major concerns with the manuscript as detailed in the following¡£¡£ÌáÁ˺ܶàÎÊÌâ¡£ Éó¸åÈË2:the manuscript appears to reveal some important discrepancy and, apparently, deficiency of the model based on new statistical findings. The manuscript gives a very good survey in the introduction that puts the work into an appropriate context. Some simulation data are then provided side-by-side with the experimental data. With a good agreement in ....However, some data were not presented too clearly and quantitatively.ÌáÁËһЩÎÊÌâ¡£ Éó¸åÈË3:The paper is a very well written report of a very interesting study of the....The authors might consider making a stronger statement in this regard, by way of justified speculation. It was a pleasure to read this paper. There are a few minor corrections: ¼¸´¦±ÊÎó¡£ ¶ÒÏÖ֮ǰµÄ³Ðŵ£¬ÏÈÉ¢½ð20£¬µÈÎÄÕÂÖÐÁËÔÙ¸ø´ó¼Ò80½ð°É¡£¡£¡£²»ºÃÒâ˼£¬ÎÒ¾ÍÒ»µãµã½ð±Ò¡£¡£¡£¡£ ´ó¼Ò¿´¿´Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÈçºÎ¡£Ï£ÍûͶ¹ýOLµÄ¸øÐ©Ö¸µ¼Òâ¼û¡£ ±à¼µÄÒ»¾ä»°£ºNote the one revision policy. I was tempted to reject but decided to give a chance to revise. ¸Ð¾õͦÏÅÈ˵ģ¬ÊÇÌ×»°Âð? лл´ó¼Ò²ÎÓë¡£ |
13Â¥2014-08-21 10:34:59
3Â¥2014-08-20 18:17:03
yuanyeguhong
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- Ó¦Öú: 7 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 9811.2
- Ìû×Ó: 10513
- ÔÚÏß: 678.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1784766
6Â¥2014-08-20 18:21:17
9Â¥2014-08-20 18:26:53
¼òµ¥»Ø¸´
wenw20004Â¥
2014-08-20 18:20
»Ø¸´
lnqswjtu(½ð±Ò+1): лл²ÎÓë
×£¸£ [ ·¢×ÔСľ³æ¿Í»§¶Ë ]
zimoruyan12Â¥
2014-08-20 18:41
»Ø¸´















»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
Â¥Ö÷ºÃÔË£¡ 