24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1608  |  回复: 11
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

萧语桐

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 有关审稿人的问题已有2人参与

最近投了篇talanta, 关于审稿人的意见有些弄不明白,请各位虫友帮忙分析一下:
1. The aims of the work are not well described in the abstract and I would like to suggest to the authors that they modify the text in order to present in a clear way the objectives of the research.
2. In the experimental section, details about the characterization of the Ag NCs particles using TEM technique are absent. I recommend the authors insert these details.
3. In my opinion, the quality of the figures is good. I suggest the authors that they improve the presentation of the figures, mainly the plots.
谢谢!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

greeneese

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1

mvpyqz

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
萧语桐: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2014-07-21 12:08:48

萧语桐

新虫 (初入文坛)

萧语桐

新虫 (初入文坛)

信息提示
请填处理意见