24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 5869  |  回复: 30

F_Shaw

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)

[交流] 两个审稿人给出了大改,但Associate Editor给了拒稿 已有3人参与

Dear Dr. XXXX,

Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received.  You will see that they are advising that we consider accepting your paper after major revision.  However the needed revisions are too substantion to allow the paper to proceed without a second round of review.  Please consider my rejection this version a "soft" decision. Both reviewers have indicated that they would like to see the revision and they will be invited to review the new submission.  Both reviewers have agreed to be identified.  XXXX is Reviewer #1, and XXXXX is Reivewer #2.  Both reviewers have downloaded files in addition to the comments listed below.  Let me know if you have any problems downloading this files.

The one issue that must be addressed in a revision is a clear distinguition from previous publihsed papers.  It is fine to document how new data supports conclusions made in prior work, but these must be significant advances and you must be clear as to why the new information either proves or disproves previous studies.

Considering the extent of revision needed, I have not provided any editorial input to this version.  I would be willing to help you with the revision prior to your formal resubmission.  The easiest way to do this is for you to email me your revised manuscript (XXXXXXX) and we can work outside of the Elsevier system.
————————————————
Reviewer #1: The purpose of this paper, as poorly stated in lines 90-95,XXXXXX. I completely re-wrote this paper because without doing so, it would have been impossible to understand the aim of the work. Although the paper is very poorly written, it may be worthy of publication with major revisions. I have two major objections (items 1-2 below) and several recommendations for the authors.
XXXXXXX
————————————————
Reviewer #2: The manuscript presented a valuable case study on XXXXX. XXXXXXXXXX. The data analysis is logical, the conclusions are convincing in general. The figures and tables are largely adequate to support the points made in the current manusript. The length of the manuscript is about right, although it could be slightly longer if the authors are going to make revisions according to the reviewer's suggestions.
Major issues with the current manuscript include the following:
XXXXXXXXX
______________________
两个审稿人提了很多意见,Associate Editor的意思是在我重投之前,可以协助我修改,工作量有点大啊!
各位虫友有没有这样的经历,像这样机会大不大?

[ Last edited by F_Shaw on 2014-4-11 at 13:58 ]
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

Cover_Letter

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

Paper,paper,paper!
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

xubin_szu

金虫 (著名写手)

★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
F_Shaw: 金币+1 2014-04-07 17:42:49
这个估计是修改后重投,楼主针对意见好好修改,还是有很大的机会。
2楼2014-04-07 17:10:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jinjt11

银虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我也刚收到这么重投的结果,本来想改投其他杂志,但是导师要求修改重投。
27楼2014-04-11 09:13:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

hqg


F_Shaw: 金币+1 2014-04-08 10:39:45
3楼2014-04-07 17:18:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

04010126

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)


F_Shaw: 金币+1 2014-04-07 18:08:34
这没什么呀   总比拒收好吧
不以物喜,不以己悲!
4楼2014-04-07 17:44:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

F_Shaw: 金币+1 2014-04-08 10:39:49
2
5楼2014-04-07 17:47:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

syjxsl

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)


F_Shaw: 金币+1 2014-04-07 18:08:39
祝福楼主~~~
6楼2014-04-07 17:52:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

F_Shaw: 金币+1 2014-04-08 10:39:59
7楼2014-04-07 17:55:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

F_Shaw

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by 04010126 at 2014-04-07 17:44:38
这没什么呀   总比拒收好吧

之前投过一个杂志也被拒收吧    拒收不一定是文章本身水平差   有可能是不对该杂志的口味   也可能是英语写作水平不过关
这次两个审稿人  一个老外  一个华裔(中国人)   那个老外说我英语写作很烂   那个华裔(中国人)没说啥语言问题  从审稿意见看  完全看懂了我的文章  看来我的英文写作还是太中国式啊
Paper,paper,paper!
8楼2014-04-07 18:08:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

pepperp

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)


F_Shaw: 金币+1 2014-04-07 18:44:06
祝福~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
9楼2014-04-07 18:16:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

F_Shaw: 金币+1 2014-04-08 10:40:05
祝福
10楼2014-04-07 18:55:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 F_Shaw 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 今年的国基金是打分制吗? 50+3 zhanghaozhu 2026-03-14 3/150 2026-03-16 17:07 by 北京莱茵润色
[考研] 一志愿苏州大学材料工程(085601)专硕有科研经历三项国奖两个实用型专利一项省级立项 +3 大火山小火山 2026-03-16 5/250 2026-03-16 16:54 by barlinike
[考研] 321求调剂 +5 大米饭! 2026-03-15 5/250 2026-03-16 16:33 by houyaoxu
[考研] 311求调剂 +5 26研0 2026-03-15 5/250 2026-03-16 16:21 by a不易
[考研] 0703化学调剂,求各位老师收留 +8 秋有木北 2026-03-14 8/400 2026-03-16 15:21 by 哦哦123
[考研] 312求调剂 +3 陌宸希 2026-03-16 4/200 2026-03-16 15:06 by peike
[考研] 材料与化工一志愿南昌大学327求调剂推荐 +7 Ncdx123456 2026-03-13 8/400 2026-03-16 12:15 by karry wen
[硕博家园] 深圳大学硕士招生(2026秋,传感器方向,仅录取第一志愿) +4 xujiaoszu 2026-03-11 8/400 2026-03-16 09:45 by xujiaoszu
[考研] 0856专硕279求调剂 +5 加油加油!? 2026-03-15 5/250 2026-03-15 11:58 by 2020015
[考研] 材料与化工 323 英一+数二+物化,一志愿:哈工大 本人本科双一流 +4 自由的_飞翔 2026-03-13 5/250 2026-03-14 19:39 by hmn_wj
[考研] 328求调剂 +3 5201314Lsy! 2026-03-13 6/300 2026-03-14 15:31 by hyswxzs
[考研] 一志愿哈工大材料324分求调剂 +5 闫旭东 2026-03-14 5/250 2026-03-14 14:53 by 木瓜膏
[考研] 材料工程专硕,一志愿中国矿业大学,总分314,求调剂 +5 无懈可击的巨人 2026-03-10 5/250 2026-03-14 00:37 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 材料工程,326分,求调剂 +6 KRSLSR 2026-03-10 6/300 2026-03-13 23:47 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 26调剂/材料/英一数二/总分289/已过A区线 +6 步川酷紫123 2026-03-13 6/300 2026-03-13 21:59 by 星空星月
[考研] 302求调剂 +6 负心者当诛 2026-03-11 6/300 2026-03-13 16:11 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 工科材料085601 279求调剂 +8 困于星晨 2026-03-12 10/500 2026-03-13 15:42 by ms629
[考研] 一志愿211化学学硕310分求调剂 +8 努力奋斗112 2026-03-12 9/450 2026-03-13 15:41 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 研究生招生 +3 徐海涛11 2026-03-10 7/350 2026-03-12 14:26 by 徐海涛11
[考研] 085602化工求调剂 +7 董boxing 2026-03-10 7/350 2026-03-10 17:07 by BruceLiu320
信息提示
请填处理意见