| 查看: 5648 | 回复: 30 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
F_Shaw捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
两个审稿人给出了大改，但Associate Editor给了拒稿 已有3人参与
|
|||
|
Dear Dr. XXXX, Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising that we consider accepting your paper after major revision. However the needed revisions are too substantion to allow the paper to proceed without a second round of review. Please consider my rejection this version a "soft" decision. Both reviewers have indicated that they would like to see the revision and they will be invited to review the new submission. Both reviewers have agreed to be identified. XXXX is Reviewer #1, and XXXXX is Reivewer #2. Both reviewers have downloaded files in addition to the comments listed below. Let me know if you have any problems downloading this files. The one issue that must be addressed in a revision is a clear distinguition from previous publihsed papers. It is fine to document how new data supports conclusions made in prior work, but these must be significant advances and you must be clear as to why the new information either proves or disproves previous studies. Considering the extent of revision needed, I have not provided any editorial input to this version. I would be willing to help you with the revision prior to your formal resubmission. The easiest way to do this is for you to email me your revised manuscript (XXXXXXX) and we can work outside of the Elsevier system. ———————————————— Reviewer #1: The purpose of this paper, as poorly stated in lines 90-95,XXXXXX. I completely re-wrote this paper because without doing so, it would have been impossible to understand the aim of the work. Although the paper is very poorly written, it may be worthy of publication with major revisions. I have two major objections (items 1-2 below) and several recommendations for the authors. XXXXXXX ———————————————— Reviewer #2: The manuscript presented a valuable case study on XXXXX. XXXXXXXXXX. The data analysis is logical, the conclusions are convincing in general. The figures and tables are largely adequate to support the points made in the current manusript. The length of the manuscript is about right, although it could be slightly longer if the authors are going to make revisions according to the reviewer's suggestions. Major issues with the current manuscript include the following: XXXXXXXXX ______________________ 两个审稿人提了很多意见，Associate Editor的意思是在我重投之前，可以协助我修改，工作量有点大啊！ 各位虫友有没有这样的经历，像这样机会大不大？ [ Last edited by F_Shaw on 2014-4-11 at 13:58 ] |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 Cover_Letter |
» 猜你喜欢
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有21人回复
-
不自信的我
已经有5人回复
-
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！
已经有4人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 审稿人给出的意见是extensive English revision，这是让我大范围修改语言吗？
已经有17人回复
- 论文大修，三个审稿人，花了将近一个月时间修改现在提交了，一直with editor...
已经有27人回复
- APL 已经给审稿人发了邀请信5天了都没动静
已经有15人回复
- Accept后附带审稿意见，一般还修改不？
已经有32人回复
- 解密IEEE TRANS. 的两次under review的原因
已经有9人回复
- APL二审这个状态是不是换审稿人了?
已经有34人回复
- l两个大修，编辑拒稿，是否可重投该杂志？
已经有11人回复
- with editor 是什么意思
已经有11人回复
- 文章被拒了，两个审稿人意见完全相反，值得申诉么？
已经有45人回复
- 编辑让修改成short communication后再投，我还修改吗
已经有14人回复
- 文章第二次修改，有点迷茫
已经有17人回复
- 文章With Associate Editor - Under Review 半个多月了，要不要催一下呢？
已经有9人回复
- 论文几次被AE拒，需要申述吗
已经有7人回复
- Elsevier投稿，审稿人说的有附件传给我了，但我没收到，怎么回事？
已经有12人回复
- 审稿人要求修改搞一定到返回再次审稿！可是修改稿状态2周一直With Editor 为何
已经有4人回复
- Editor assigned
已经有14人回复
- minor revision，除了问题的回答外，一些套话要怎么写的，比如感谢审稿人什么.
已经有13人回复
- Materials and Design 审稿人没意见 编辑让加括号 至今With Editor
已经有7人回复
- 求助大家：副主编没安排外审，而是自己审了就让主编决定，是否预示要拒稿？
已经有4人回复
- 请问这个Associate Editor assigned是什么意思呀？这个状态维持了一个多月了。。。
已经有15人回复
- 如何增加Appeal的成功率！--文章被拒申诉成功的见解
已经有59人回复
F_Shaw
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
- 应助: 95 (初中生)
- 金币: 2224.8
- 散金: 925
- 红花: 53
- 帖子: 1201
- 在线: 348.8小时
- 虫号: 1257528
- 注册: 2011-04-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 矿床地球化学和有机地球化
8楼2014-04-07 18:08:31
F_Shaw
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
- 应助: 95 (初中生)
- 金币: 2224.8
- 散金: 925
- 红花: 53
- 帖子: 1201
- 在线: 348.8小时
- 虫号: 1257528
- 注册: 2011-04-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 矿床地球化学和有机地球化
17楼2014-04-07 19:17:36
F_Shaw
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
- 应助: 95 (初中生)
- 金币: 2224.8
- 散金: 925
- 红花: 53
- 帖子: 1201
- 在线: 348.8小时
- 虫号: 1257528
- 注册: 2011-04-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 矿床地球化学和有机地球化
19楼2014-04-07 19:20:47
F_Shaw
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
- 应助: 95 (初中生)
- 金币: 2224.8
- 散金: 925
- 红花: 53
- 帖子: 1201
- 在线: 348.8小时
- 虫号: 1257528
- 注册: 2011-04-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 矿床地球化学和有机地球化
26楼2014-04-10 22:12:23
F_Shaw
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
- 应助: 95 (初中生)
- 金币: 2224.8
- 散金: 925
- 红花: 53
- 帖子: 1201
- 在线: 348.8小时
- 虫号: 1257528
- 注册: 2011-04-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 矿床地球化学和有机地球化
30楼2014-04-11 13:49:09
F_Shaw
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
- 应助: 95 (初中生)
- 金币: 2224.8
- 散金: 925
- 红花: 53
- 帖子: 1201
- 在线: 348.8小时
- 虫号: 1257528
- 注册: 2011-04-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 矿床地球化学和有机地球化
31楼2014-04-11 13:49:57