[交流] 投green chem的通讯悲剧了，被建议转至RSC Advances

有些郁闷啊。本来觉得创新性挺好的，也复合绿色化学的办刊宗旨，结果悲剧了。郁闷。
Thank you for your submission to Green Chemistry. All manuscripts submitted to Green Chemistry are initially evaluated by the Editors to ensure they meet the essential criteria for publication in the journal. I’m sorry to say that on this occasion your paper will not be considered further because it is not of sufficient impact to appeal to our readership.
Full details of the initial assessment can be found at the following URL: http://www.rsc.org/initialassessment/
However, I would encourage you to transfer your work to our sister-journal RSC Advances. RSC Advances publishes high-quality research from across the chemical sciences, and has sophisticated topic modelling technology to ensure the visibility of your research. RSC Advances was launched in 2011 and already has a partial impact factor of 2.5, with a rejection rate that is currently 50%. More information about RSC Advances can be found at www.rsc.org/advances
本来计划着，混到个green chem的审稿意见，即使被拒，也可以根据审稿意见改进一下尝试chemsuschem呢，结果。。。。。。。也只好接受转投了。

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

295求调剂已经有4人回复
290求调剂已经有5人回复
0856调剂已经有3人回复
寻找调剂已经有3人回复
312求调剂已经有4人回复
304求调剂已经有6人回复
0856材料求调剂已经有8人回复
博士自荐已经有9人回复
272求调剂已经有3人回复
311求调剂已经有3人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

麻烦大神帮计算一下RSC旗下 Chemcomm 和Greenchem 影响因子达到多少了已经有6人回复
RSC Advances 转投后一直是transfer in Draft的情况已经有18人回复
Green chem 被拒，编辑推荐RSC advances 已经有8人回复
是不是投RSC的CC JMC 或者ES被拒的都会被转到advances 已经有12人回复
投CC，后被主编转到RSC ADV，一周就返回了审稿意见，现在大修返回，under review中已经有13人回复
投chem commun,回复建议我直接转入RSC Advances. 已经有7人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2014-03-27 09:19:29

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

wkf1234

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 5082.7
帖子: 827
在线: 1087.4小时
虫号: 716709

★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖

引用回帖:

32楼: Originally posted by smallfolk at 2014-06-18 09:44:20
汗，我也不是很清楚，反正当初我投绿色化学时，是觉得能配得上绿色化学的，现在我依然是这么认为，只是因为我们没有名气而已。我也觉得投RSC advances有些亏，当初我们主任说，其实很适合大cc，只不过我写了5页，实 ...

你说的你们没有名气，是什么意思？