版块导航: 正在加载中...

登录注册

应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

smallfolk

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 92 (初中生)
金币: 639.7
帖子: 701
在线: 599.4小时
虫号: 442827

[交流] 投green chem的通讯悲剧了，被建议转至RSC Advances

有些郁闷啊。本来觉得创新性挺好的，也复合绿色化学的办刊宗旨，结果悲剧了。郁闷。
Thank you for your submission to Green Chemistry. All manuscripts submitted to Green Chemistry are initially evaluated by the Editors to ensure they meet the essential criteria for publication in the journal. I’m sorry to say that on this occasion your paper will not be considered further because it is not of sufficient impact to appeal to our readership.
Full details of the initial assessment can be found at the following URL: http://www.rsc.org/initialassessment/
However, I would encourage you to transfer your work to our sister-journal RSC Advances. RSC Advances publishes high-quality research from across the chemical sciences, and has sophisticated topic modelling technology to ensure the visibility of your research. RSC Advances was launched in 2011 and already has a partial impact factor of 2.5, with a rejection rate that is currently 50%. More information about RSC Advances can be found at www.rsc.org/advances
本来计划着，混到个green chem的审稿意见，即使被拒，也可以根据审稿意见改进一下尝试chemsuschem呢，结果。。。。。。。也只好接受转投了。

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

麻烦大神帮计算一下RSC旗下 Chemcomm 和Greenchem 影响因子达到多少了已经有6人回复
RSC Advances 转投后一直是transfer in Draft的情况已经有18人回复
Green chem 被拒，编辑推荐RSC advances 已经有8人回复
是不是投RSC的CC JMC 或者ES被拒的都会被转到advances 已经有12人回复
投CC，后被主编转到RSC ADV，一周就返回了审稿意见，现在大修返回，under review中已经有13人回复
投chem commun,回复建议我直接转入RSC Advances. 已经有7人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2014-03-27 09:19:29

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

kingki

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

应助: 465 (硕士)
金币: 23654.3
帖子: 7935
在线: 601.3小时
虫号: 514983

★
smallfolk(金币+1): 谢谢参与

chemsuschem比green chem高一级好不好！

赞一下