应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 交流 » 投PRE的文章，这样的状态是怎么样的？希望大不？
51/1返回列表
查看: 1323  |  回复: 12
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ratnest

铜虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 投PRE的文章，这样的状态是怎么样的？希望大不？

投PRE的文章，这样的状态是怎么样的？希望大不？
两个审稿人人貌似意见不是特别一直，一个说很好，另一个说做的东西不新，写作一般，但是大修后可以发表。编辑给的是个修改，没说小修还是大修。大家给个意见哈

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Report of the First Referee
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The authors of the present manuscript present the results of simulations of ***. The used is that of  (2004) and  (2001).

The results are not surprising, as this model is not new and dendrite  arrays have been very thoroughly studied in the past, the authors  should compare their results with existing literature.

While the authors cite this work, they do not compare  their results with it, although their approach is very similar. As a  part of the rewriting, the authors should cite appropriately previous works and compare their results with those previously reported.

In summary, while the results do not seem to be too surprising or new,  this work might be worthy of publication in PRE, but not at this point, as major rewriting should be undertaken.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Report of the Second Referee
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The paper presents a careful analysis of *** based on a *** model.

The calculations are based on the *** model and are done  carefully. The investigation of the important physical effects for this problem is comprehensive. The authors discuss both the trends and physical mechanisms that control the amount of ***. Their computational results are compared to two existing theoretical models to show the range of validity of these theories. This is a very good paper that makes a strong contribution to the field by (i) ; and (ii). The writing is very clear and the figures are excellent. I recommend for publication in Physical Review E.

Below is a list of minor issues that the authors may wish to address:
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼 2014-02-16 09:58:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ghost820521

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
★
ratnest(金币+1): 谢谢参与
大修小修都是修改，按照要求改就是了。
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2014-02-16 10:46:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 13 个回答

wdxmu

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
★
ratnest(金币+1): 谢谢参与
✌✌✌

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2014-02-16 10:07:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

listensea8318

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
★
ratnest(金币+1): 谢谢参与
希望很大，好好改吧
赞一下 回复此楼
10楼2014-02-16 11:03:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
kiss200855372楼
2014-02-16 10:06   回复  
ratnest(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 [ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
查看全部 13 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭