| 查看: 1689 | 回复: 12 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
投PRE的文章，这样的状态是怎么样的？希望大不？
|
|||
|
投PRE的文章，这样的状态是怎么样的？希望大不？ 两个审稿人人貌似意见不是特别一直，一个说很好，另一个说做的东西不新，写作一般，但是大修后可以发表。编辑给的是个修改，没说小修还是大修。大家给个意见哈 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Report of the First Referee ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The authors of the present manuscript present the results of simulations of ***. The used is that of (2004) and (2001). The results are not surprising, as this model is not new and dendrite arrays have been very thoroughly studied in the past, the authors should compare their results with existing literature. While the authors cite this work, they do not compare their results with it, although their approach is very similar. As a part of the rewriting, the authors should cite appropriately previous works and compare their results with those previously reported. In summary, while the results do not seem to be too surprising or new, this work might be worthy of publication in PRE, but not at this point, as major rewriting should be undertaken. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Report of the Second Referee ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The paper presents a careful analysis of *** based on a *** model. The calculations are based on the *** model and are done carefully. The investigation of the important physical effects for this problem is comprehensive. The authors discuss both the trends and physical mechanisms that control the amount of ***. Their computational results are compared to two existing theoretical models to show the range of validity of these theories. This is a very good paper that makes a strong contribution to the field by (i) ; and (ii). The writing is very clear and the figures are excellent. I recommend for publication in Physical Review E. Below is a list of minor issues that the authors may wish to address: |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
今天务委会开完了，明天出结果吗
已经有8人回复
-
在坚冰还盖着北海的时候，我看到了怒放的梅花。
已经有7人回复
-
今日不放榜？网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果
已经有22人回复
-
某些机构，以效率低为荣，以效率低作为存在感
已经有9人回复
-
放榜前的不淡定
已经有18人回复
-
什么时候开奖？
已经有13人回复
-
如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑，不妨来听听这首《基金之外》
已经有8人回复
-
没有任何消息-是不是就凉了
已经有10人回复
-
人气不行了
已经有11人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有22人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 希望在投的文章都能接收，且赶上青年基金申请，散金求好运！
已经有246人回复
- 文章小修希望有好的结果
已经有36人回复
- 求助：这个情况有希望吗？
已经有7人回复
- 被拒的文章该反驳就得反驳，这意味着希望
已经有13人回复
- 【33所名单已出！】状态没变的还有希望
已经有4人回复
- ICASSP问题求助！！！有投的朋友请看一眼！！谢谢！！
已经有14人回复
- IEEE 期刊论文修改说明，请高手指点
已经有11人回复
- 一审意见 有希望被录用吗？
已经有11人回复
- 请教各位虫子，有关材料方面的英文文章投何国内EI期刊？希望审稿能快的。
已经有12人回复
- 文章被拒，各位前辈帮忙看看修改下是否可以重投有希望吗？J chromatography B
已经有9人回复
- 结构工程，两篇一作JCR三区的SCI论文，7篇一作JCR四区SCI文章，中博后基金希望有多大
已经有77人回复
- IEEE 投稿后只返回一个专家的审稿意见，其它6个审稿人都拒审，文章还有希望吗？
已经有16人回复
- 论文被录用后还能大改吗？
已经有4人回复
- 我的文章投了半年了，都没有杂志录用，很是纠结，希望大家帮忙啊
已经有24人回复
- 请问 Final Preproduction Review 被录用的希望大吗？
已经有19人回复
- SCI论文从入门到精通（第一版）
已经有93人回复
- optics express 审稿状态咨询
已经有9人回复
- 被拒了，准备改投，请教一下~~
已经有33人回复
3楼2014-02-16 10:07:51
5楼2014-02-16 10:46:13
10楼2014-02-16 11:03:01
简单回复
2014-02-16 10:06
回复
ratnest(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 [ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
20